Race Clincher Tyre
Moderator: robbosmans
Turbo Cotton with latex is obviously the fastest, if more expensive and fragile
If going Conti (and it's a good choice) then as a faster alternative to the GP4000S2, consider the Supersonic (much thinner) or the GP Force (24mm and a fraction thinner)
If going Conti (and it's a good choice) then as a faster alternative to the GP4000S2, consider the Supersonic (much thinner) or the GP Force (24mm and a fraction thinner)
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
The only downside to the GP4000s is perhaps a very slightly less supple ride than other tyres. But this is more than made up for with puncture resistance, wear, grip and low weight. If using alloy wheels then coupled with latex tubes would improve the ride feel. With a C17 rim then a 23mm is the optimum for racing. A 25mm ends up with a lightbulb effect so although it may be more comfortable isn't faster. I don't think you can call it a racing rim if the inner is wider than that.
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:50 pm
Got a set of Specialized Turbo Cottons 24mm's on at the moment and have done over 2000 miles so far. They come up at 25mm on my 17C Bora's. They feel lovely. Very smooth and much better on all surfaces than my go to GP4000’s and also feel more comfortable at the same time.
Also tried Michelin Power Competitions but didn't like them for various reasons and also Specialized S-Works.
I only use 23 (24) mm tyres which always seem to come up between 24 and 26 mm on the 17C Bora's.
Also tried Michelin Power Competitions but didn't like them for various reasons and also Specialized S-Works.
I only use 23 (24) mm tyres which always seem to come up between 24 and 26 mm on the 17C Bora's.
Bianchi Oltre XR2 + Campagnolo Super Record 11 + Campagnolo Bora 50C
Litespeed T1 + Campagnolo Chorus 11 + Campagnolo Shamal Ultra
Litespeed T1 + Campagnolo Chorus 11 + Campagnolo Shamal Ultra
c60rider wrote:The only downside to the GP4000s is perhaps a very slightly less supple ride than other tyres. But this is more than made up for with puncture resistance, wear, grip and low weight. If using alloy wheels then coupled with latex tubes would improve the ride feel. With a C17 rim then a 23mm is the optimum for racing. A 25mm ends up with a lightbulb effect so although it may be more comfortable isn't faster. I don't think you can call it a racing rim if the inner is wider than that.
There are plenty of racing rims with substantially wider internal widths, the newer Roval wheels, ENVEs, Bontrager Aeolus. I don't think I regularly ride any wheels under 19.5mm internal width any more.
morganb wrote:c60rider wrote:The only downside to the GP4000s is perhaps a very slightly less supple ride than other tyres. But this is more than made up for with puncture resistance, wear, grip and low weight. If using alloy wheels then coupled with latex tubes would improve the ride feel. With a C17 rim then a 23mm is the optimum for racing. A 25mm ends up with a lightbulb effect so although it may be more comfortable isn't faster. I don't think you can call it a racing rim if the inner is wider than that.
There are plenty of racing rims with substantially wider internal widths, the newer Roval wheels, ENVEs, Bontrager Aeolus. I don't think I regularly ride any wheels under 19.5mm internal width any more.
The fashion in recent years is to go wider and that is the perception for a lot of the consumers that wider is faster. Only if coupled with the right tyre. A C15 with a 23mm tyre is no different than a C17 and a 25mm if comparing the profile of the tyre and rim. Too wide a tyre on a rim causes it to lightbulb so losing the aerodynamic effect. Which is why a 23mm Conti or Vittoria (measures at 25mm+) fits so well with a C17. A Conti/Vittoria 25mm (which measure over 27mm) starts to lightbulb. But then you can start to mistake larger tyres having a greater volume of air in them, thereby being able to run them at lower pressure and that being more comfortable and feeling faster. So for training comfort is possibly the priority over speed so a bigger tyre is always better but if it's outright speed you're after, and if you're racing that's what you want, then comfort is sacrificed a little for the aerodynamic benefits. Otherwise you would see the pros running 40mm tyres and mountain bike rims at Paris-Roubaix. They only really go up to 26/28mm tubs but then you can't compare clinchers and tubs at all when it comes to rim width and the effect on tyres. Rim width has no effect on how wide a tub is but has a huge effect on the profile of a clincher. Bigger internal width of rims need bigger tyres to maximise those aero benefits.
This article that's been used here before explains it far better than I ever can https://intheknowcycling.com/2016/04/03/best-wider-road-bike-tires-wheel-sizes/
I think the differences we're getting with a certain rim width, tyre width, pressure and so on are far less significant than the manufacturers would have us believe. Anything to get us to buy the latest as if what we're currently using is now no good.
Last edited by c60rider on Wed Jul 26, 2017 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sd5500 wrote:Turbo Cottons with latex tubes! they come in 24 and 26. I raced the 24s on my 4.5s all year. No flats, cuts, and high miles.
Yep ... my setup exactly
2024 BMC TeamMachine R
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault
+1 for veloflex
I've had my master 25s for a few months now and they've been great. I don't know if they are but they certainly feel faster than the tyres I had before (hutchinson equinox 2)
I've had my master 25s for a few months now and they've been great. I don't know if they are but they certainly feel faster than the tyres I had before (hutchinson equinox 2)
c60rider wrote:morganb wrote:c60rider wrote:The only downside to the GP4000s is perhaps a very slightly less supple ride than other tyres. But this is more than made up for with puncture resistance, wear, grip and low weight. If using alloy wheels then coupled with latex tubes would improve the ride feel. With a C17 rim then a 23mm is the optimum for racing. A 25mm ends up with a lightbulb effect so although it may be more comfortable isn't faster. I don't think you can call it a racing rim if the inner is wider than that.
There are plenty of racing rims with substantially wider internal widths, the newer Roval wheels, ENVEs, Bontrager Aeolus. I don't think I regularly ride any wheels under 19.5mm internal width any more.
The fashion in recent years is to go wider and that is the perception for a lot of the consumers that wider is faster. Only if coupled with the right tyre. A C15 with a 23mm tyre is no different than a C17 and a 25mm if comparing the profile of the tyre and rim. Too wide a tyre on a rim causes it to lightbulb so losing the aerodynamic effect. Which is why a 23mm Conti or Vittoria (measures at 25mm+) fits so well with a C17. A Conti/Vittoria 25mm (which measure over 27mm) starts to lightbulb. But then you can start to mistake larger tyres having a greater volume of air in them, thereby being able to run them at lower pressure and that being more comfortable and feeling faster. So for training comfort is possibly the priority over speed so a bigger tyre is always better but if it's outright speed you're after, and if you're racing that's what you want, then comfort is sacrificed a little for the aerodynamic benefits. Otherwise you would see the pros running 40mm tyres and mountain bike rims at Paris-Roubaix. They only really go up to 26/28mm tubs but then you can't compare clinchers and tubs at all when it comes to rim width and the effect on tyres. Rim width has no effect on how wide a tub is but has a huge effect on the profile of a clincher. Bigger internal width of rims need bigger tyres to maximise those aero benefits.
This article that's been used here before explains it far better than I ever can https://intheknowcycling.com/2016/04/03/best-wider-road-bike-tires-wheel-sizes/
I think the differences we're getting with a certain rim width, tyre width, pressure and so on are far less significant than the manufacturers would have us believe. Anything to get us to buy the latest as if what we're currently using is now no good.
What aerodynamic effect? Per data from wind tunnel, wider tire (e.g. light bulb effect) is sure-footed with less rolling resistance, lower tire pressure is ~1 watt slower. Unless you are a Cat 1/pro chasing podium, ~1 watt is utterly meaningless. Every time you pull a water bottle out and take a sip, you penalize yourself with ~ 15 watts.
Keep in mind that, 95 % of road cyclists don't even race! I find it humerous as to why riders mimic pros and train on pure race machines with deep carbon wheels and narrow tires.
Racing is a three-dimensional high-speed chess game, involving hundreds of pieces on the board.
CBA = Chronic Bike Addiction
OCD = Obsessive Cycling Disorder
CBA = Chronic Bike Addiction
OCD = Obsessive Cycling Disorder
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com