Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Mon Nov 20, 2017 2:56 pm

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:28 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Physically in Montréal, but my mind is in the Pyrénées
Lugan wrote:
Wireless brakes to go with wireless shifting: I have 5 bikes and all are mechanical shifting not because I am a luddite but because electronic and half-wireless groupsets don't offer enough difference for me to make a switch. Once the whole thing is wireless, I will be an early adopter. Since wireless braking would likely come in the form of hydro discs, it will also be my first road disc bike.

I was kidding about wireless brakes, it will never happen, too much risks. If a user forget to charge or any electrical glitch... finishing a ride without shifting is relatively okay, without brakes though...

_________________
Dan Gerous


Top
   
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:25 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 4749
When is finishing a ride, any ride, without the ability to shift... ok? Just sayin. Now if they can release wireless, or even wired electronic brakes to the masses... then I guess that will be proof enough that failure is not even a remote possibility. Till then... I'm ok with mechanical, especially since it still works better for me in all respects. Speed, feel, ability to throw it around 1, 2, 3 or more cogs at the back simultaneously shifting with the front. Boom! Yeah... I'm holding out for the day when people start coming to their senses (not really, cuz that's unlikely to happen anytime soon). Now... gimme some o' dem whale finned ZIPPS. Ha! No i'm not serious, at least about the new ZIPPS.

_________________
Colnago C60 - PR99
C59 Five Years Later
My Special Colnago EPQ
Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Posts: 783
TheDarkInstall wrote:
youngs_modulus wrote:
antonioiglesius wrote:
I like the fact that there are new players in the market, like Wahoo and Lezyne. But, to me, it feels like they're primarily playing catch-up to Garmin. Sure, the Elemnt might have a nice screen, and marketing might be excited about that, but I'm not. I know what I'm about to say is unfair to the engineers etc. from these new players, but I keep having this general feeling that they're just mucking around and not doing anything truly innovative.

Oh, this is interesting. I'm not sure what you mean by mucking around, but in my opinion as an engineer, Garmin is sloppy and more than a little lazy. They're leaving room for their competitors in a couple of areas:

- Their code is buggy as hell. New firmware releases routinely break previously-functional features.

- Garmin often waits months to release fixes for the above-mentioned buggy code, even when the fixes are trivial. I'm not sure why that is. It can't be due to the time required for regression testing...if that were the reason, they wouldn't be releasing such buggy code in the first place.

- For a long time, Garmin didn't really understand cycling. They implemented lots of features that didn't matter much to cyclists but failed to address cyclists' actual needs. (For example, smart recording was basically useless with power...or for courses that were not dead-straight, at least the last time I checked). Additionally, before they switched to a binary file format (.fit files) their data files referred to our activity as "biking," which speaks volumes about how many cyclists (bikers?) they had working on their stuff for the cycling market.

- They used to charge outrageous sums for street maps. Maybe they still do, but OpenStreetMaps has come along and taken that business away from them. My heart bleeds for Garmin's lost revenue.

- My Edge 500's screen has a resolution of 128x160 pixels. This is lower-res than the Texas Instruments TI-92 graphing calculator, which was introduced in 1995. There are office buildings with way more windows than my Garmin has pixels. Readability and information density are both limited by this resolution. The Wahoo Elemnt's resolution is 240x400. It's a bigger device, but Garmin's low-res displays are still generally low-hanging fruit for its competitors.


antonioiglesius wrote:
So what do I find really innovative?

First of all, good for you for asking that rhetorical question. Many people just stamp their feet and demand "more innovation," which is silly. You're willing to try to describe what you'd like to see. Cheers!

Secondly: I mean this in the best possible way, but I can't help thinking that by "innovation" you mean "features which I personally find exciting." Seriously, this is not a criticism. But "innovation" is such an ill-defined term that it ends up meaning whatever the speaker wants it to mean. As a result, it doesn't mean much to the people who are actually doing what most people think of as "innovating."

Your comparison with the iPhone is apt. GPS-based bike computers and smart phones were introduced around the same time and have since become mature products. It's not that people have run out of ideas for these things; it's that all the interesting/hard stuff has already been done for these products.

You suggest that maybe "tech has plateaued," but I'm not sure what this means. We're no longer finding new planets in our solar system, but I can't imagine anyone arguing that "astronomy has plateaued."

For a long time, Garmin was the only game in town for GPS-based bike computers. They became fat and happy, and now competitors are starting to nibble at them with products that cost less and show (a lot) more attention to detail. Either Garmin will ignore the competitors until Garmin becomes a non-entity in that market, or they'll respond with cheaper, better computers to compete with Lezyne, Polar et al. Either way, consumers win.


Excellent! Completely agree.

In addition, Garmin is schizophrenic as hell; they shift around ideas and fundamentally change designs in the same product tree, then revert back to form once it proves to be idiotic (getting rid of the touch screen and hiding zoom deep in the menus on the 520, then binning that blatantly insane idea and going back to touch for the 820, for example)

Their customer service is a joke too.

I would like to see an open source standard bike computer OS along the lines of Linux come out.



I was user of Garmin Edge 500 for few years, and did not have any problems using it. I come to Garmin from Polar CX800 which i payed 450 eur, and it was total s*it (for example the most important button does not work properly, and it was like that on every single device i saw). So Edge 500 was twice cheaper then Polar in that time, and offeer many inovative things. I used Edge 500 for following routes which i download from the net (and upload to the edge), or the routes that i create and upload for riding. I use this for many times without any problems, since i was riding many times alone and in foreign countrys, so this was important to me.

In using Edge 500 for 3 years, only ONCE i lost part of the course (i pause the ride, and the device was going off, and that happened. I just turned off auto off option, and never any problem since that). The things i did not like to Edge 500 was slow time finding satelittes sometimes, and that i had to connect to a Pc after the ride.. But again.. For that time when it was introduced it was much better then the competition.

Edge 510, had awfull touch screen (i really think if u dont need GPS for instant navigation when u ride, u dont need Touch Screen), buggy software and bad resolution.


Now im using Edge 520 for few months. I can say i really like this device. As first much better screen and resolution compared to Edge 500, so now i have almost all screens i need on the main screen, so dont need to shift screens during the ride. I think this is allready an upgrade. Then, bluetooth Phone connection work very nice.. I really like that i can upload ride imediatly after i finish (often after the ride we are going for espresso, so i can analuze the ride there with the friends..). Better GPS (Glonass), means it's finding the satelittes very quick.. For routing and course creating, i just put OpenStreetMaps, and there was enough storage space to put few different country's (where i usually ride), and it's much better then Edge 500 bread crunch routing. It's that nice that i almost dont see a point of having device like Edge 820. About zoom option i dont have also problems to change it during the ride (and im using often). Also i like recovery check option. Strava Live Segment made me riding fun, and also make me to ride with more effort on almost every ride ,and also using a lot.. Other thing which is very nice is that i can see SMS or Phone call on the screen, so to decide should i pick up, or just ignore it.. So i really cant find better device then EDGE 520 in this moment on the market. Connect IQ also make this device future proof and we can expect more interesting software.

About Edge 820 and touch screen.. It's different device then Edge 520 in the main point of the device.. It's a navigation device, and on that kind u need touch screen, since it's faster to type that way.. Also this touch screen actually work much better then total s*it touch screen of Edge 510. If u dont need Instant Navigation then u dont need this.Edge 520 is just good enough, and i definetly recommend it.

And usefull link not just for Edge 520:

https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/05/dow ... 00810.html


And finnally enough for Garmin :) What am i holding out on? After so much marketing hype make me want things like MORE AERO, Ligher, Stiffer... I was lucky enough to actually try different bikes and eqipment.. And i realize that there is so much marketing and i realized that my self i like simple and things that actually work.. So i realized that i dont need AERO , not need Electric shifting (i realy like mechanical feeling of Campy...), no need Disk Brakes.. So im holding out on some simple, high qualiy steel or titanium frame.. Probably my next one would be Colnago Master or Arabesque...

What is now happening in the Bike Industry, remind me on HiFi and Surround Hype few years ago (which is total marketing compared to HighQuality Stereo )


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:36 pm
Posts: 727
I am holding out until Campagnolo rim brake replacement pads are no longer available and I am forced to upgrade to hydraulic disc brakes. Not sure what the outcome of the UCI disc brake trial will be or when Campagnolo intends to release their version of disc brakes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
It's all downhill from here, except for the uphills.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 6:34 am
Posts: 73
Shimano S-Phyre RC9 in black. Shimano said these will be a limited edition release and expected in January.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:35 am
Posts: 140
Location: Melbourne, Australia
TheDarkInstall wrote:
Started a concept design of the frame I want.

https://youtu.be/5ItuJP4n8hA

Canyon have already been in touch about making a one-off for me, but I told them to do one, as they wanted to include an inverted -90mm stem with the design.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
It's ALL about the bike.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 5:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:02 pm
Posts: 89
Dan Gerous wrote:
Lugan wrote:
Wireless brakes to go with wireless shifting: I have 5 bikes and all are mechanical shifting not because I am a luddite but because electronic and half-wireless groupsets don't offer enough difference for me to make a switch. Once the whole thing is wireless, I will be an early adopter. Since wireless braking would likely come in the form of hydro discs, it will also be my first road disc bike.

I was kidding about wireless brakes, it will never happen, too much risks. If a user forget to charge or any electrical glitch... finishing a ride without shifting is relatively okay, without brakes though...


That's a good point. I hadn't thought of that. So maybe I am ready for eTap!


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 1:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:49 pm
Posts: 68
topflightpro wrote:
11-speed.


It'll never happen, not enough demand.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 1:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:36 am
Posts: 205
The next US election.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:08 am
Posts: 833
Dan Gerous wrote:
I was kidding about wireless brakes, it will never happen, too much risks. If a user forget to charge or any electrical glitch... finishing a ride without shifting is relatively okay, without brakes though...


Just have the default be on, like air brakes on big trucks. :lol:


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:49 am
Posts: 502
- Cervelo Sca (project california)
- Schmolke stem


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:46 pm
Posts: 122
A new bike computer that feels like it's worth changing to.
My Edge 510 is still going quite good after three years. It's starting to show some problems but I'm waiting for something that feels like an actual upgrade instead of just the same in a nicer package.
Maybe the new Stages computer will do that.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:08 am
Posts: 154
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Been waiting for some new and (kinda) cheap electronic groupsets and some new cranks before upgrading.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:50 pm
Posts: 254
A disc road bike with normal race geometry with clearance and mounting points for fixed guards and 25mm tyres, running campag and some disc specific (Lighter wheels due to lower stresses on rims, rather than standard wheels with disc attached). Probably wont see it this year. Specialized Tarmac Disc S-Works would have almost hit the spot (-Campag) if it could actually take discs properly. BMC Roadmachine 02 may be close but not seen one in the flesh yet (again - Campag but need to be realistic!)

_________________
Bianchi Oltre XR2 + Campagnolo Super Record 11 + Campagnolo Bora 50C
Litespeed T1 + Campagnolo Chorus 11 + Campagnolo Shamal Ultra


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:06 pm
Posts: 80
eTap 2nd gen with less bulky batteries


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
   
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 7:05 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandrumarian, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], crn, darnellrm, glepore, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Greatestalltime, Johnnysmooth, madik, mbdurham17, oldnslow2, racingcondor and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited