Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:38 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062

All times are UTC+01:00

Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
 Post subject: compare apples to apples
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 am 

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 11:42 pm
Posts: 3915
Location: lat 38.9677 lon 77.3366
Arrggghhh! mega assumption !
Apples to apples if you please. A fit rider that is 200lbs will greatly exceed a fit rider at 140. Every study I have read supports the fact that bigger riders put out more watts. Magnus Baksted comes to mind. Ask how many frames the guy broke last year. A big rider may or may not go faster on those hills but he will be putin out the watts regardless. Weight limits are needed and I would like to see the same thing done with frames and forks. The needs of a very big or small rider are not met when all the info you get from the bike company it that X frame is now 10% lighter and 13% stiffer and other useless stuff without any real comparison. With a weight limit I can assume that the bike was designed for a guy my size (big, small or average). Also how many bike owners have a way to measure power? Not the best way to market safety if 85% of your target buyers do not know what they produce as a peak power. We should also consider the fit heavy weight rider sprinting at 1200 watts plus will loose more power to the flex in a ti spindle as compared to a cromo that offsets the gain made by the slightly lighter wieght of the ti spindle. Again the same with frames and forks. So my point is that if you are over the wieght limit you are in most cases better served by the cromo spindles unless your a real dog in the power dept. But then why do you want a ti spindle?

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Concept Full Carbon Seatpost weight?

in Road




Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:06 pm

chris14 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Weight of Cannondale carbon Save seatpost?

in Road




Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:07 pm

evan326 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help: 2015 S-works Carbon Seatpost weight

in Road




Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:26 am

nemeseri View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Breaking the UCI minimum weight limit without any carbon fiber

in Road




Wed Jun 01, 2016 1:55 pm

2lo8 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What's a good stem and handlebar weight? Decent Average weight ?

in Road




Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:49 am

Wingnut View the latest post

All times are UTC+01:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AJS914, Baidu [Spider], beanbiken, Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media and 29 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited