Sacke wrote:I would call it utter bollocks if the system clearly wasn't an alternative to regular cranksets.
Compared to other cranksets: It doesn't have any of the benefits it claims. It's heavy. It doesn't have any of the benefits it claims. It's expensive. It doesn't have any of the benefits it claims. It's inefficient. It doesn't have any of the benefits it claims. It's a maintenance nightmare. And finally, it doesn't have any of the benefits it claims. It's an alternative to regular cranksets for people who have been conned by the company or are crazy. It doesn't even do what Q-rings do, because the ratio stays constant throughout the pedal stroke - so what's the point?
How good a friend of yours is the guy that makes these things?