Where would you cut weight off this build?
Moderator: robbosmans
I just recently switched to Conti Supersonic tubes at 49g. each. I have used them before but with mixed results. However I think my previous problems were due to running too high of a pressure (120psi). Now I run 90psi with wide tires and rims. So far no issues. Besides weight savings you'd get reduced rolling resistance. I buy them in bulk so they weren't too expensive from a normal tube.
I have the Extralite Aliens 4 QR and they are fantastic. Every bit as functional as a heavy QR but without the weight. Well worth it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have the Extralite Aliens 4 QR and they are fantastic. Every bit as functional as a heavy QR but without the weight. Well worth it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
I think there are areas in which we wouldn't want to cut weight or things we don't want to change and without knowing what they are it's rather hard for the forum to make suggestions. Maybe you guys let us know what you are looking to change? For eg. It wouldn't be useful for us to make suggestions for cockpit or saddle if you are sure you want to stick to what you have.
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:44 am
pdlpsher1 wrote:I just recently switched to Conti Supersonic tubes at 49g. each. I have used them before but with mixed results. However I think my previous problems were due to running too high of a pressure (120psi). Now I run 90psi with wide tires and rims. So far no issues. Besides weight savings you'd get reduced rolling resistance. I buy them in bulk so they weren't too expensive from a normal tube.
I have the Extralite Aliens 4 QR and they are fantastic. Every bit as functional as a heavy QR but without the weight. Well worth it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hey
Yeah I think I will go with Aliens4. I looked at Streeters which are 10g lighter but I sort of don't trust how delicate they look. 39g Aliens4 seem like the perfect balance of very light while still being functional.
Aliens4 are 135mm on the rear so how much thread sticks out the end on your bike (assuming you are not running discs)
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:44 am
Thanks. That is not a problem, and is even more weight saving.
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:04 pm
Don't forget the pedals - can't find a verified weight for the 7900's but assume they are going to be around 250g. Sub 200g should be fairly easy to achieve without spending too much cash (from memory by Look Carbon Blades with Ti spindles are about 180g).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just take a look at some of the WW bikes on this thread and you can drop a whole bunch of weight depending how much you want to compromise and your budget. Good luck
Xena a demi god among the digital demimonde that is WW community
http://i.imgur.com/hL5v3ai.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131970499@N02/
http://i.imgur.com/hL5v3ai.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131970499@N02/
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:04 pm
Oh, and don't forget bottle cages - all carbon is not the same! I have mandibles which are great but heavy (ca 27g each) - I also have some Chinese cheapies (ca 13g each from memory).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have smud 3grms and a tune 4grms so there , Mine are lighter than yours
Xena a demi god among the digital demimonde that is WW community
http://i.imgur.com/hL5v3ai.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131970499@N02/
http://i.imgur.com/hL5v3ai.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131970499@N02/
addictR1 wrote:Hi Karl yea.. I followed your thread. The frame weight between TMR02 and 01 is very different.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Really ?? I thought that the TMR01 and TMR02 where the same except for the fork ?
C64 My Sixty 4 SR EPS 12