Ultegra Disc vs Mech how much weight

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

jeffy
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:51 pm

by jeffy

Will someone gain more time

* going up hill (from lighter bike)
* going downhill (more confidence/better braking)

1kg = 30 seconds for a 30 minute climb AFAIK (IIRC a Wiggins quote)

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



maxxevv
Posts: 2012
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:51 am

by maxxevv

Thanks for the detailed information!

Side point is that skewers can be used for both, though thru-axles are the correct and better setup.

If that's taken out, its less than 1 pound (410g) in total weight difference.

User avatar
mpulsiv
Posts: 1385
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:17 pm

by mpulsiv

Again, all of you comparing weight to older caliper BR-RS785, which is ~160 grams heavier in contrast to BR-RS805 flat mount caliper.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Racing is a three-dimensional high-speed chess game, involving hundreds of pieces on the board.

:arrow: CBA = Chronic Bike Addiction
:arrow: OCD = Obsessive Cycling Disorder

jeffy
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:51 pm

by jeffy

so a pair of flat mount are 80g? BR-RS785 are 240g with pads

User avatar
mpulsiv
Posts: 1385
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:17 pm

by mpulsiv

BR-RS805 (flat mount) ~ 127 grams https://www.bike24.com/1.php?content=8; ... ,4,320,322

BR-RS785 ~ 284 grams https://www.bike24.com/1.php?content=8; ... ,4,320,322


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Racing is a three-dimensional high-speed chess game, involving hundreds of pieces on the board.

:arrow: CBA = Chronic Bike Addiction
:arrow: OCD = Obsessive Cycling Disorder

maxxevv
Posts: 2012
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:51 am

by maxxevv

Its a "piece" versus a " pair" .... look at the description provided by Bike24 again.

ourmanflint
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:12 pm

by ourmanflint

Would love to see someone show me weights for frames for both disc and non-disc versions. Lots of people saying it's negligible but I very much doubt that.

User avatar
mpulsiv
Posts: 1385
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:17 pm

by mpulsiv

maxxevv wrote:Its a "piece" versus a " pair" .... look at the description provided by Bike24 again.


Right, it's ~ 127 grams weight savings per piece x 2 = 254 grams per pair by choosing BR-RS805 over BR-RS785. Am I missing something? Why would anyone invest in older BR-RS785 with ~ 254 grams penalty?
Racing is a three-dimensional high-speed chess game, involving hundreds of pieces on the board.

:arrow: CBA = Chronic Bike Addiction
:arrow: OCD = Obsessive Cycling Disorder

User avatar
LeDuke
Posts: 2029
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:39 am
Location: Front Range, CO

by LeDuke

One thing that hasn't been addressed yet:

Disc-only rims can be significantly lighter than their rim brake counterparts. See ENVE, etc.

http://enve.com/product-category/ses-disc/

justaute
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:17 pm
Location: UT/TX/PA, USA

by justaute

I'm pretty sure he's trying to say it's "one" vs "pair. Thus, the delta is much smaller.

RS805=127g (127x2=254); does not state if it's "filled"; does not state it's a "pair"
RS785=~284g per pair & "filled"



mpulsiv wrote:
maxxevv wrote:Its a "piece" versus a " pair" .... look at the description provided by Bike24 again.


Right, it's ~ 127 grams weight savings per piece x 2 = 254 grams per pair by choosing BR-RS805 over BR-RS785. Am I missing something? Why would anyone invest in older BR-RS785 with ~ 254 grams penalty?

User avatar
CBJ
Posts: 1058
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:22 pm
Location: Brooklyn

by CBJ

LeDuke wrote:One thing that hasn't been addressed yet:

Disc-only rims can be significantly lighter than their rim brake counterparts. See ENVE, etc.

http://enve.com/product-category/ses-disc/


Not correct Madcow has that in his calculation.

maxxevv
Posts: 2012
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:51 am

by maxxevv

Yes indeed he has. Its about 30-35g per rim as he listed.

User avatar
LeDuke
Posts: 2029
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:39 am
Location: Front Range, CO

by LeDuke

My apologies. Read the first page before Madcow responded, typed up my response, hit reply today. Sorry!

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

User avatar
mpulsiv
Posts: 1385
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:17 pm

by mpulsiv

justaute wrote:I'm pretty sure he's trying to say it's "one" vs "pair. Thus, the delta is much smaller.

RS805=127g (127x2=254); does not state if it's "filled"; does not state it's a "pair"
RS785=~284g per pair & "filled"



mpulsiv wrote:
maxxevv wrote:Its a "piece" versus a " pair" .... look at the description provided by Bike24 again.


Right, it's ~ 127 grams weight savings per piece x 2 = 254 grams per pair by choosing BR-RS805 over BR-RS785. Am I missing something? Why would anyone invest in older BR-RS785 with ~ 254 grams penalty?


Did you click on "fact sheet"? It says "1 caliper incl. L02A brake pads and front wheel adaptor". No matter how you looking at this, BR-RS805 is new technology, lighter, slimmer and more aero!

http://bike.shimano.com/content/seh-bik ... rior-.html
The new Flat Mount front fork and rear stay fitting also brings aerodynamic advantages by introducing a closer fit between the caliper and the frame, reducing the need for visible mounting bolts.
Racing is a three-dimensional high-speed chess game, involving hundreds of pieces on the board.

:arrow: CBA = Chronic Bike Addiction
:arrow: OCD = Obsessive Cycling Disorder

justaute
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:17 pm
Location: UT/TX/PA, USA

by justaute

I sure did. Opinion is just that, opinion. The wordings on bike24 lack precision. Big deal.

No one is arguing that RS805 is not "better". I wished my bike had flat mount and 805, but 785 is fine.


mpulsiv wrote:
justaute wrote:I'm pretty sure he's trying to say it's "one" vs "pair. Thus, the delta is much smaller.

RS805=127g (127x2=254); does not state if it's "filled"; does not state it's a "pair"
RS785=~284g per pair & "filled"



mpulsiv wrote:
maxxevv wrote:Its a "piece" versus a " pair" .... look at the description provided by Bike24 again.


Right, it's ~ 127 grams weight savings per piece x 2 = 254 grams per pair by choosing BR-RS805 over BR-RS785. Am I missing something? Why would anyone invest in older BR-RS785 with ~ 254 grams penalty?


Did you click on "fact sheet"? It says "1 caliper incl. L02A brake pads and front wheel adaptor". No matter how you looking at this, BR-RS805 is new technology, lighter, slimmer and more aero!

http://bike.shimano.com/content/seh-bik ... rior-.html
The new Flat Mount front fork and rear stay fitting also brings aerodynamic advantages by introducing a closer fit between the caliper and the frame, reducing the need for visible mounting bolts.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply