I'm thinking again about picking up a Cannondale Synapse Carbon as an everyday driver and recall having seen offhand remarks in this forum in the past where people have said that Tour Mag blasted the bike for having poor BB stiffness. In other words, the implication was that the Power Pyramid split seat tube design did not perform as claimed and the bike was noodly.
I have tried to find the original Tour article but have not had any luck, so can anyone provide a link, or at least provide the original data, preferably with some comparisons (other leading bikes, or Cannondale's own Caad 12)?
Quantifiable Cannondale Synapse BB Stiffness
Moderator: robbosmans
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Here is a link for roadbike.de test.
http://www.roadbike.de/rennraeder/test-cannondale-synapse-hi-mod-ultegra.1344996.9.htm
BB stiffness is according to this test very good.
http://www.roadbike.de/rennraeder/test-cannondale-synapse-hi-mod-ultegra.1344996.9.htm
BB stiffness is according to this test very good.
HiMod & disc.
I saw somewhere comparison of BB stiffness and Synapse (non HiMod) was at the end. From the second hand, in mentioned "test" BMC GF has way better bb stifness, and I know from own experience that's not exactly truth ( even BMC team don't use this frame for classics- instead they rode on special modified version called RBX, and even on '13 season team bikes were heavily modified for the team ( avg framset was 200g heavier in comparison to regular GF01) ) , so I would be very carefull - to not say skeptic- in trusting magazine tests, specially if it's Tour.
I saw somewhere comparison of BB stiffness and Synapse (non HiMod) was at the end. From the second hand, in mentioned "test" BMC GF has way better bb stifness, and I know from own experience that's not exactly truth ( even BMC team don't use this frame for classics- instead they rode on special modified version called RBX, and even on '13 season team bikes were heavily modified for the team ( avg framset was 200g heavier in comparison to regular GF01) ) , so I would be very carefull - to not say skeptic- in trusting magazine tests, specially if it's Tour.
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain
I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that
Mark Twain
I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that
Giant test I consider as more reliable than "tour" ; they use "advert by comparison" and this has to show real numbers , however testing procedure is still mystery - but : it has be be something in it- Cannondale "improved BB stiffness in 2016 SsixHM in comparison to previous model" .
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain
I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that
Mark Twain
I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com