by carlcurry on Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:35 pm
It seems this thread derailed into a Shimano/Campagnolo pissing contest and ignored some of the things worth noting about this group set.
* A redesign of PowerTorque to ease maintenance. That was a valid complaint of the current generation of PowerTorque. It is a complaint of mine about OverTorque - I quite like my 30mm axle OverTorque cranks, but having to buy the proprietary tool to work on them doesn't help market adoption.
* A new brake pad compound to improve performance on aluminum brake tracks. Interesting. The segment of the market that will buy the group will likely be on aluminum wheels ($). Makes sense. If it proves a winner it will probably trickle up. Or, heck, maybe my next brake pad replacements are Potenza.
* 11-32 cassette option. I'm getting older. Getting past the tough it out mentality on my 27. A lot of people will appreciate it.
* Subtly redesigned ergo hoods. The Campagnolo 11 hoods are already the most comfortable out there. A couple reviewers say this is a further improvement.
* Slightly easier movement of the shift levers (I think that's what the reviewer was referring to). Assuming you want to reach a wider market, probably the right move. I quite like the sure footed, beefy feel of my current UltraShifts, but they do require a certain kind of purposeful usage (for lack of a better way to say it)
It may not happen, but I wish Campagnolo would just set pricing to equal Ultegra in each market - at least at the OEM unit cost. Remove the cost object entirely. Let people have a true choice on their bike coming off the shop floor. People should decide for themselves what they prefer.
Right now in American bike shops it looks like the same bike over and over with a different frame manufacturers name on it. I barely bother looking in a shop any more. I just online research who will sell me the frame only for those I'm interested in so I don't end up with a cookie cutter bike.
Bianchi Infinito CV, Cervelo R3, Giant TCR, Trek Domane SLR, Specialized Allez