Kayrehn wrote:wheelsONfire wrote:It's a bit of a pity Bura SL is so expensive in EU. I checked Bura SL when i built a light weight bike. But even though many of the brands are built in Asia these days, they still cost to close to a Vial EVO D frameset.
I'll actually still choose Neilpryde over Ax Lightness in that case, friends says it rides great and in terms of company reputation I'll trust the former, but that's just me. Wonder what others think?
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I think many here have misinterpreted the state of Ax Lightness current status. I have spoken to Nils and a few dealers so i am set in this a bit.
Ax make a hell of a frame with Vial EVO D. There are deep pocket guys in Germany who owns both Vial EVO D and RCA.
More than a few prefer Vial EVO D but it is not something in the open.
Talking warranty of different brands and also Ax, i must say that warranty is probably ok for most brands.
But fact is that warranty matters are dealt with a bit differently and it comes down to how you handle it yourself in more than a few cases.
There is IMO no problem going with Ax Lightness. There are a few people in the business who seems to set aside making some comments
of Ax Lightness. For my own, it does not matter as i have checked things up.
Talking the frames, i would not go for a Bura SL over an Ax Lightness as Bura SL cost too much.
If Bura SL was hand-built bye them it would cost much much more.
Just imagine what any frame would cost sold by any company/ brand, but built by Ax Lightness
IMO, Bura SL should cost less than what it does for a frameset.
http://www.vandeyk.de/index.php/vdc.htmlor Swift carbon Sculp.
But i am not here to boost Ax or talk about them. As they say, each to his own.