Power Meter Brand Reliability
Moderator: robbosmans
Power2Max all the way
I have 2 units both with Rotor cranqs.
On my training bike a Rotor 3D 110mm. This one is used during all season in and outdoor so in all kind of conditions during and not one time a had a problem with it. It's only not working when the battery is empty but replacing it is easy and quiclky done I keep a spare battery at work and in my car.
I also had 3 powertaps alway's problems with them I needed 3 units because one of them was at service all the time. Torque hub replacement each time last time they gave me a new wheel. This one is only used for indoor rides now.
I have 2 units both with Rotor cranqs.
On my training bike a Rotor 3D 110mm. This one is used during all season in and outdoor so in all kind of conditions during and not one time a had a problem with it. It's only not working when the battery is empty but replacing it is easy and quiclky done I keep a spare battery at work and in my car.
I also had 3 powertaps alway's problems with them I needed 3 units because one of them was at service all the time. Torque hub replacement each time last time they gave me a new wheel. This one is only used for indoor rides now.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
- Tinea Pedis
- Posts: 8616
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
- Contact:
That wouldn't be the correct conclusion, as SRM have made some great products. As mentioned, their PV6 stuff (drift aside) were very dependable. Only they do now seem to be playing catch-up. Which when they are at the price point they are, makes for a tricky time ahead.
It's interesting to see so many people recommend brand X, usually not an SRM, and talk about their great customer service. It's because so many folks have needed it.
The best customer service is the one you'll never/rarely need.
The best customer service is the one you'll never/rarely need.
I don't have one brand in mind. I was serious when I said it's all of the above, excluding SRM.
Vector's durability, specifically their pods, is mediocre
Stages hands out battery doors like candy on Halloween
Quarq's record, prior to their current series that takes 2032 batteries, is ho-hum. Their current units are better, but far from perfect
Powertaps have had bearing issues, and some water sealing issues
Vector's durability, specifically their pods, is mediocre
Stages hands out battery doors like candy on Halloween
Quarq's record, prior to their current series that takes 2032 batteries, is ho-hum. Their current units are better, but far from perfect
Powertaps have had bearing issues, and some water sealing issues
When a pro team ditches their sponsor's PM and buys their own, it says a lot about who they choose. Without being super specific, that team chose Power2Max and it wasn't because of budgetary reasons or anything of the sort.
Unless they're willing to share why they picked P2M, I wouldn't let that sway my decisions in any way. It could be for some non PM (technical) reason like they wanted to run Campy rings, which greatly limits their choices.
If I was going with P2M, I'm make sure my unit didn't read low. I know of a few units which suffer from long interval drift.
If I was going with P2M, I'm make sure my unit didn't read low. I know of a few units which suffer from long interval drift.
Last edited by rijndael on Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tinea Pedis
- Posts: 8616
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
- Contact:
You're misinterpreting what is being said. It reads 'lower than my SRM'. That does not mean 'reads low'. Simply lower than what my SRM's would say. In some cases it was less than 2%, in some more. But rough average was 2% less. Which given SRM's have real and measurable temperature drift, is about what I expected.
So I'm more inclined to believe my P2M is closer to my real power (especially as my numbers match between my two P2M units), but that is just my take.
So I'm more inclined to believe my P2M is closer to my real power (especially as my numbers match between my two P2M units), but that is just my take.
Tinea Pedis wrote:You're misinterpreting what is being said.
No, I'm not. I didn't base that on anything that's been said in this thread, I'm basing it on experience comparing a P2M to a PT, which previously tracked well with a Quarq and an SRM.
- Tinea Pedis
- Posts: 8616
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
- Contact:
You standardise them all? I did, with a LeMond and a speed sensor.
Interestingly, when DC Rainmaker compared it to a PowerTap he found they were spot-on indoors - but there was drift within one of the units outside...
http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/01/powe ... eview.html
Given P2M has temperature compensation built in and the PT didn't, it's your call on which you prefer and if you can live with a unit that 'reads low'.
Interestingly, when DC Rainmaker compared it to a PowerTap he found they were spot-on indoors - but there was drift within one of the units outside...
http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/01/powe ... eview.html
Given P2M has temperature compensation built in and the PT didn't, it's your call on which you prefer and if you can live with a unit that 'reads low'.
I didn't.
I had a lot of data showing it tracked well with 2 other known units. It was pretty clear based on the other data (cadence, speed, and power from the other units) the P2M was the culprit - not the PT. On long intervals the power read low.
I had a lot of data showing it tracked well with 2 other known units. It was pretty clear based on the other data (cadence, speed, and power from the other units) the P2M was the culprit - not the PT. On long intervals the power read low.
- Tinea Pedis
- Posts: 8616
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
- Contact:
I can only point out what one guy (who does it for a living) found. I know that's an appeal to authority, but Ray is damn thorough. And is why I now try to use a method to standardise the power data.
I'm guessing you updated the P2M firmware? If so, that's a comparison against units that drift with temp. As mentioned in the link.
P2M does read lower than my SRM, no doubt. No much - and looking back over my notes there were times it was equal. It's only my ego that's really suffered though. As for Quarq's accuracy...well, I've seen some incredible figures from my team mates off theirs. Two of them died on me. Drift was an issue. In no rush to try one again.
I'm guessing you updated the P2M firmware? If so, that's a comparison against units that drift with temp. As mentioned in the link.
P2M does read lower than my SRM, no doubt. No much - and looking back over my notes there were times it was equal. It's only my ego that's really suffered though. As for Quarq's accuracy...well, I've seen some incredible figures from my team mates off theirs. Two of them died on me. Drift was an issue. In no rush to try one again.
And FWIW, I have a lot of respect for Ray's approach and data. Some of the people helping him on the backside (data correlation) are very clueful.
Part of the problem is we're dealing with sample sizes of one, there are certainly going to be outliers.
Part of the problem is we're dealing with sample sizes of one, there are certainly going to be outliers.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com