Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Wed May 25, 2016 6:59 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 5:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:03 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Newcastle, England
solarider wrote:
5 bolt circle. Soooo 2013!

Seriously, looks great, but with so much weight behind the new 4 bolt 'standard' (Shimano, Campagnolo and FSA), won't 5 bolt look quickly outdated, and (if the performance and weight hype is to be believed) seriously outclassed in performance terms?


If 4 bolt is so brilliant, why did it take so long for companies to adopt it for road bikes. Zipps Vuma Quad came and went, despite being a really good crankset. Mtb cranks have been using it for years but road cranks didn't. I suspect because 4 bolts with smaller rings is great, but with larger rings requires more stiffness in the material to avoid any shifting issues (Zipps Vuma Quad reputedly had quite flex chainrings). No doubt 4 bolt will become more standard as the market leaders are pushing it but I suspect in reality it's no better and possibly even worse than five bolt.

Personally, I don't even like the aesthetics of the current crop of 4 bolt cranksets.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:54 am
Posts: 22
So does the new crank sit above or below the M3?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:08 pm
Posts: 455
It looks looks like the new top end crank, ahead of the M3 and the original, which now seems to have been renamed the 'Classic'.

Zipp didn't have the market share (in terms of making something radical stick) or engineering expertise (in terms of making it function well) to make 4 arm work at the time (think Mavic Zap - years ahead of Di2, but it took Shimano to secure mainstream acceptance of electronic shifting). For a start, they used very lightweight traditional rings, and an evenly spaced 4 bolt pattern, leaving the heaviest pat of the pedal stroke relatively unsupported. The current crop use more substantial rings and an asymmetric bolt pattern which should be inherently less flexible.

But the main point is that with Shimano dominating the market as they do, and only now offering 4 arm down to 105, the new standard will prevail. Sure FSA and Campagnolo have a tiny market share, but even so, 4 arm does look like the future. I am not arguing for it or against it from a performance perspective (I run Campagnolo and haven't tried it yet), but I am making the point that the industry seems to be moving on.

Mainstream high end chainsets are so good and pretty light these days that the likes of the Clavicula are looking a bit unnecessary. I ran one for a while and it is quite a delicate flower, requiring a return visit to the factory after a while for a check up, and it does have a very high Q Factor. I just don't think that such a high maintenance piece of kit is worth it now at such a high price when the standard kit is so good.


Last edited by solarider on Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:14 am, edited 5 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 510
+1 on the point about the quality of chainsets from the Big 3, but then the buyers of Clavicula cranks looks beyond mere functionality. They'll buy it for its looks, weight and price (the more expensive the better). It's the cranks most people will throw onto a boutique Titanium frame and not on a mainstream bike frame that's ready to be raced. I'll say five-bolt crankarms design is more in line with the product's image rather than a more modern looking 4-bolt design.

_________________
Trek Mad-one 7 Series team colours http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=115500&start=15


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 1554
Solarider took the words out of my mouth...ZIPP aren't a market leader in cranksets...

_________________
"It never gets easier, you just go faster..." - Greg Lemond

"I enjoy climbing...I enjoy seeing people disappear behind me." - Robert Millar


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:03 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Newcastle, England
In terms of volume I'm sure that Thm aren't either but imo they still make the best looking and lightest cranksets available. As we're talking about Thm I'm not sure why being a market leader is relevant? Possibly market leader in the weight weenies world?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:03 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Newcastle, England
solarider wrote:
Zipp didn't have the market share (in terms of making something radical stick) or engineering expertise (in terms of making it function well) to make 4 arm work at the time (think Mavic Zap - years ahead of Di2, but it took Shimano to secure mainstream acceptance of electronic shifting). For a start, they used very lightweight traditional rings, and an evenly spaced 4 bolt pattern, leaving the heaviest pat of the pedal stroke relatively unsupported. The current crop use more substantial rings and an asymmetric bolt pattern which should be inherently less flexible.

But the main point is that with Shimano dominating the market as they do, and only now offering 4 arm down to 105, the new standard will prevail. Sure FSA and Campagnolo have a tiny market share, but even so, 4 arm does look like the future. I am not arguing for it or against it from a performance perspective (I run Campagnolo and haven't tried it yet), but I am making the point that the industry seems to be moving on. .


I take your point but there was nothing wrong with the Zipp crankset, just the rings. The even spacing must be less relevant than you think, as I mentioned before, mtb cranks have been doing that for years, admittedly with smaller chainrings. Also, Shimano were already using substantial chainrings with the 7900, so they haven't really changed the chainring design with the 9000, just the bolt positioning. On the basis that there as nothing wrong with the 7900 as a mainstream crankset I don't see the reasoning behind the 4 bolt pattern other than a novelty to sell to the masses.

I agree that the 4 bolt will become the new 'standard' purely because of major multi nationals pushing it. Slightly concerning though. Reminds me of a line in the film Armageddon that says something like "it's not a choice, it's a lack of options".


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:54 am
Posts: 22
I've just ordered a M3 is that a bad idea?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:18 pm
Posts: 487
New pictures on THM FACEBOOK


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Posts: 1415
Location: Europe
Couldn't post 'em, elfuinha? Personally, I'm mostly curious about the weight.

Image
Image

_________________
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7882
Location: San Francisco, CA
Weenie crankset market pretty much saturated with SRAM Red which was remarkably light with aftermarket rings, with Specialized S-Works virtually as good. But these are very nice looking cranks.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 5:07 am
Posts: 246
Come on guys, really?? I was about to pull the trigger on an M3, now I will have to wait.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:01 am
Posts: 44
Why not the M3? It's more versatile and cheaper, isn't it?

_________________
Canyon CF SLX DA Di2 2014
Canyon Aeroad CF SLX 2016
Canyon Speedmax CF 2015


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:23 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 3649
Location: Tucson, Az.
If you ordered the M3 you probably will want to keep things on order. This is not a new version of the M3, this is a new flagship model that comes in above the Clavicula classic. Can't release details until next week though.

_________________
Fair Wheel Bikes

Fair Wheel Blog

Instagram


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:23 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Austin, TX
That 4-bolt design on the Shimano cranks does bring a nice benefit, the elimination of the concept of standard vs. compact. That's a plus to me.

On that new THM crank, very sexy! Hope they keep the graphics to a minimum.

_________________
My Cervelo R5
My Lynskey Helix
My MTB


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Eurobike 2015

[ Go to page: 110 11 12 13 14 ]

in Road

madcow

198

26301

Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:04 pm

cedced74 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Oval Concepts 520 crank vs 5750 crank weights?

in Road

kkapdolee

0

300

Thu Dec 17, 2015 8:18 pm

kkapdolee View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Would you ride this crank ?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

trailflow1

15

1752

Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:13 pm

Svetty View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Crank sizes

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Lewski33

19

1033

Tue Oct 13, 2015 11:41 pm

rmerka View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. BB right crank list

in Road

JackWalk

9

820

Sun Jul 05, 2015 5:37 pm

uraqt View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Frankie - B, MSNbot Media, shonanmike, toshi and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited