HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:09 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Loveland, CO
How's the lifespan of the aluminum 28 cog on the xdome cassette? And is the cog replaceable?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 4:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 4:57 am
Posts: 48
Image

Set it up right and you can squeeze an 11-32 into a 9000 rear mech (SL4 Tarmac) :) negates the need for a long cage setup for silly climbing.

_________________
Using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 4:36 am 
  • 17.90 € (including 19% VAT)
  • 59 components


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:03 pm
Posts: 10
6870 without a doubt. For the same money you will shift better and you will go faster.

I just completed a thorough comparative analysis of the top 2 tiers of mechanical and electronic groupsets available from Shimano, Campagnolo and SRAM for my blog. The Ultegra 6870 was the best performer and its actually less expensive than the DA.

_________________
Steve
http://intheknowcycling.com
What cycling gear to get next and where to get it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:34 am
Posts: 48
No need to quote above

Totally agreed! And the reason I didn't go for DA Di2 is because it is too expensive. And another reason is we will crash when cycling and looking the expensive component breaking is not really a good thing though. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:15 pm
Posts: 156
One of my bikes has the original 6500 group set with eleven plus years of riding. My 6800 has about four thousand miles and so far has performed flawlessly. EPS is still new, but I find it hard to accept that an EPS group will last as long as the mechanical version, plus there's no worry about monitoring battery reserve or worrying about the unit losing charge.

_________________
Colnago C-59 Italia PR99 colour schema
Shimano Ultegra 6800
Shimano Dura Ace C-24

Trek 5200
Shimano Ultegra 6500
Mavic krysium Elite


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 4:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:19 am
Posts: 843
I have been thinking about replacing my SRAM YAW group so I went and test rode groups the other day. 9000 didn't impress me as much as I wanted it to. I wouldn't call it enough of a change/improvement over the SRAM to warrant the change.

6870 was copious amounts of fun. I couldn't get the front shifting to fault. Really excellent.

I went home and ordered a Super Record group though :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 11:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:20 pm
Posts: 116
The 4 position trim of the new 6800/9000 groups is just too much for me. Especially when racing.

6870 is my vote. I have over 20 000 km on mine and haven't made an adjustment. Though have swapped chains a couple times, one new cassette, and a couple full cleanings. Not having to replace internally-run cables like I did on my old bike whenever I had a couple wet rides and the housing clogged up has been so nice. I don't get the 'I like the feel of mechanical' sentiment, unless all you do is work on the bike in the stand and don't actually ride.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 12:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 204
Consider your budget for the whole bike. 6800 + nice wheels is better than 6870/9000 + crappy wheels


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

_________________
Scott Foil Team Issue, Cervelo R3, Strong Titanium


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:04 am
Posts: 19
if money isnt an issue.. DA will be choice.. but function wise, its the same as Ultegra. price point. of cos ultegra will be much lower. so it depend on yourself, do you like the bling factor of DA or functionality of the ultegra. i have 2 DA9000 ,a Ultegra Di2, and a ultegra mech groupo on the bikes and honestly, Ultegra does it job well and you can hardly feel the difference btw them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:10 pm
Posts: 2
Location: Luxembourg
jackie wrote:
if money isnt an issue.. DA will be choice.. but function wise, its the same as Ultegra. price point. of cos ultegra will be much lower. so it depend on yourself, do you like the bling factor of DA or functionality of the ultegra. i have 2 DA9000 ,a Ultegra Di2, and a ultegra mech groupo on the bikes and honestly, Ultegra does it job well and you can hardly feel the difference btw them.


The 9000 is around 1200 € only and 6870 1090... the difference is not so big !!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 89
Location: phoenix, az
I have 6870, and the "it just works" factor is fantastic. I originally wanted da9k because it is lighter and I didn't think I really needed electric, but complete bike availability dictated the decision. Now that I have around 5k mi on it though, I'm not sure I'd want to deal with derailleur cables again (stretch, maintenance, adjustment, replacement, etc). I know that sounds petty and trivial, but it is really nice to be able to dial everything in at home and not have to worry about things being slightly off. To further that point, I'm not sure if it's the "special coatings" and treatments Shimano added to the 11spd chains, the auto trim, or a combination of both, but I got over 4300mi on my first 6800 chain before it started showing >.50 wear on the park tools indicator.

I use to average around 3200-3500 mi to .70-.75 wear with 6700 chains on my previous sram drivetrain.


Last edited by weekapaugin on Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:36 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7419
Location: Geeeelong!
teslasports wrote:
The 9000 is around 1200 € only and 6870 1090... the difference is not so big !!

If you're not racing/putting yourself in situations where crashing is a risk, then could very well be worth paying the difference.

But if you're racing, just wait until you need to replace a lever or a RD. That's when the difference really bites.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:41 am
Posts: 62
hhmmm I had the same dilemma and ended up using 9000 on my race bike and 6800 on my rain bike, I had a demo with 6870 and it was great, but personal preference plays a big roll, I like the mechanical feel of it. sram cassettes are generally more expensive, and I just plain didnt have good luck with the brand so ultegra cassettes is what I use.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:09 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Loveland, CO
weekapaugin wrote:
but I got over 4300mi on my first 6800 chain before it started showing >.50 wear on the park tools indicator.

I used to average around 3200-3500 mi to .70-.75 wear with 6700 chains on my previous sram drivetrain.


My first DA 9000 chain only lasted 3000 miles (.75 to 1.00). I used White Lightening lube. Now I'm on my second chain and I'm using Pro Gold lube. What are you using as a chain lube? I also noticed that the chain was quite 'loose' out of the box. It was measuring almost 0.50 when new.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:12 am 
  • 17.90 € (including 19% VAT)
  • 59 components


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 89
Location: phoenix, az
I used dumonde tech lite on the first chain, it just started showing over .50 on the indicator at 4300mi. I noticed Park/Shimano recommend changing 11spd chains at .50, but 10spd used to be .75 wear on the cc-2 checker, for what that's worth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano 6870 or 9000?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

RMcC

19

3829

Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:08 pm

RMcC View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano DI2 STI levers - DA 9070 vs Ult 6870

in Road

BdaGhisallo

1

1058

Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:09 pm

Gearhead65 View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. DA 9000 mechanical vs Ultegra 6870 Di2?

in Road

Ordinaybikes

2

474

Fri Aug 22, 2014 10:10 pm

Zoose View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano 9000 SRM dropping power

in Road

Tinea Pedis

2

552

Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:33 pm

Tinea Pedis View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano Dura Ace 9000 Chainring Staining?

in Road

mikael17128

2

601

Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:42 am

Anders3404 View the latest post


It is currently Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:22 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB