HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 5:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Posts: 511
What is considered the lightest of the true aero framesets of today?
Also, what is the most comfortable (which does not ride harsh)?

Thanks!

_________________
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO D
Paduano Racing Fidia


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 7:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 532
You might get some info here. However, some new frames have probably come out in the last year
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=123175


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 7:24 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am
Posts: 729
german tour mag compared all the latest aero frames. buy the internation version on apple store for the ipad.

lightest frameset felt ar
most aero with zipp 404 felt ar
overall canyon

giant propel advanced sl scored best in ride comfort/stiffness

_________________
Current Rides:

2014 Trek 7.9 PO 9070 di2
2015 Giant Propel AdvancedSL 9000


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 184
.


Last edited by Tenlegs on Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:40 am
Posts: 62
Regarding the Tour aerodynamic tests, I would recommend taking them as at best only very roughly accurate.

The wind tunnel they use is not adequate to properly compare aero road frames; the test section is too small vertically to properly determine drag with a rider dummy as they did. Typically wind tunnel testing requires a test section several times larger than the object tested for reasonable accuracy in drag prediction. Also, given that it's an open tunnel, even weather/temperature/time of day could skew the results by enough to predict one frame as being faster than another when that is not the case.

That being said, I truly appreciate their philosophy of actually testing manufacturers' aero claims; I think it's laudable how far they go to examine bike performance.

From the GST in Immenstaad's webpage, the tunnel diagram:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:50 pm
Posts: 343
Location: FIN
Doesn't matter tunnel. doesn't matter procedure, nothing really matters in their tests , except 1 thing : German frame has to be winner , again :mrgreen:

I don't say Canyon is "bad bike" , just express thoughts after seeing several various tests of "tour" .

_________________
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain


I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 306
Do you consider the kamm tail aero frames to be "true aero"? E.g. Trek madone or Scott foil?

_________________
AX Lightness Vial Evo, Scott Foil Team Issue, Cervelo R3, Carl Strong Titanium


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 3:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Posts: 511
eric01, great question. I've read and been told both that they are and also been told that they are not.
I don't really know how i can answer that, i don't find i have means to contradict any of the claims.
I have owned a Scott Foil and i did not really like the ride feel of it.
I took a long time for me to grasp that it came down to the frame.
I guess Look 795 could also be considered a true aero frame if Foil and Madone is!?
I also guess 795 is more comfortable, though i am not sure i like the massive integration of Looks recent frames.

_________________
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO D
Paduano Racing Fidia


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:08 pm
Posts: 222
Location: Bremerton, WA
"True aero" is pretty subjective IMO, but I'd say any frame designed with aerodynamics being (one of) the main focus would be considered an aero frame. Kamm tails tend to actually perform really well, and can beat airfoils in certain conditions. It also allows manufacturers to extend the "virtual airfoil" and still comply with the 3:1 rule. There is a reason the cars with the highest fuel economy are all shaped pretty much the same in the back (Prius, etc.)

_________________
Moloko Plus 6.24 kg

"We haven't located us yet"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:40 am
Posts: 62
Haha, true. If you're already biased, a good wind tunnel doesn't help I guess.

As ITTY said, "true aero" is pretty subjective. For bike speeds and sizes, based on some CFD studies I've done (adjoint-based adapted mesh, finite element research code, for the engineers/fellow aero nerds here) you tend to gain about 20-50% drag for a well-designed Kammtail versus airfoil depending on crosswinds. They're useful mostly for structural reasons or (in the case of the vast majority of bike companies) if you don't have particularly well-designed airfoils. They're also beneficial for slower speeds (<15-20 mph, depending on wind), but I know that doesn't apply to any of us here. :P

Cervelo's S series, Giant's Propels, and Felt's AR series are all pretty similar in terms of aerodynamics, and do a fair amount better than others currently on the market. Everybody else is noticeably (5+ watts on average at least) worse aerodynamically, whether purposefully for handling/weight reasons or simply because they can't design for aerodynamics well enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:04 am
Posts: 475
wheelsONfire - I'm thinking about a Foil. What didn't you like about it? Cheeers.

_________________
Colnago M10 viewtopic.php?f=10&t=91208&hilit=colnago+m10+maob
Simplon Pavo III viewtopic.php?f=10&t=116069"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Posts: 511
liam7020 wrote:
wheelsONfire - I'm thinking about a Foil. What didn't you like about it? Cheeers.


In short, it is a harsh ride. Especially if you ride a bit longer.

_________________
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO D
Paduano Racing Fidia


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:11 pm
Posts: 73
Location: Germany, Switzerland, France
stormur wrote:
Doesn't matter tunnel. doesn't matter procedure, nothing really matters in their tests , except 1 thing : German frame has to be winner , again :mrgreen:

I don't say Canyon is "bad bike" , just express thoughts after seeing several various tests of "tour" .



I live in Germany and yes.....Tour is indeed very well know for this :evil:
The results for German products (Cannyon, Stork, LW, etc...) are always "slightly" overestimated but this is business :twisted:
The only question is how much is "slightly" :P

_________________
currently: Colnago C60 SR 2015 6.4 kg/ Colnago Dream DA 7400/ Scott Scale XTR/ Scott Spark XTR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:22 pm
Posts: 191
Kristoff made that Canyon look good this week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 293
Location: Bristol
wheelsONfire wrote:
liam7020 wrote:
wheelsONfire - I'm thinking about a Foil. What didn't you like about it? Cheeers.


In short, it is a harsh ride. Especially if you ride a bit longer.


Bollocks. I had countless centuries as well as 200, 300 and 400 mile rides on both of mine. If you're worried about comfort just run some 25-28mm rubber and lower pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:00 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], CAFERACER, Google [Bot], han1337, raisinberry777 and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lightest Road aero drop bar?

in Road

Juanmoretime

9

1030

Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:48 am

Stueys View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lightest & smallest ANT+ bike computer (for powermeter)

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

bally81

22

1515

Wed Aug 19, 2015 10:08 pm

morkm View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. NEW AERO v LIGHT WEIGHT Bike or combine the 2?

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

ardennes777

35

2671

Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:25 am

pdlpsher1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero bike choice - Felt Ar2 or Cervelo s3

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

martyh

41

3940

Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:35 am

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Carbon Frame Bike Security

in Road

Fastfwd

6

653

Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:03 am

sungod View the latest post


It is currently Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:28 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB