Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Mon Jul 25, 2016 1:01 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Posts: 1203
Location: NorthEU
What is considered the lightest of the true aero framesets of today?
Also, what is the most comfortable (which does not ride harsh)?

Thanks!

_________________
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO D
Paduano Racing Fidia
Open *UP*
https://opencycle.com/showcase/xplr3r-1-by-rickard


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 7:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 565
You might get some info here. However, some new frames have probably come out in the last year
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=123175


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am
Posts: 828
german tour mag compared all the latest aero frames. buy the internation version on apple store for the ipad.

lightest frameset felt ar
most aero with zipp 404 felt ar
overall canyon

giant propel advanced sl scored best in ride comfort/stiffness

_________________
Current Rides:

2016 Emonda ALR Team Issue E-Tap/Bora35


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 253
.


Last edited by Tenlegs on Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:40 am
Posts: 62
Regarding the Tour aerodynamic tests, I would recommend taking them as at best only very roughly accurate.

The wind tunnel they use is not adequate to properly compare aero road frames; the test section is too small vertically to properly determine drag with a rider dummy as they did. Typically wind tunnel testing requires a test section several times larger than the object tested for reasonable accuracy in drag prediction. Also, given that it's an open tunnel, even weather/temperature/time of day could skew the results by enough to predict one frame as being faster than another when that is not the case.

That being said, I truly appreciate their philosophy of actually testing manufacturers' aero claims; I think it's laudable how far they go to examine bike performance.

From the GST in Immenstaad's webpage, the tunnel diagram:
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:50 pm
Posts: 726
Location: FIN
Doesn't matter tunnel. doesn't matter procedure, nothing really matters in their tests , except 1 thing : German frame has to be winner , again :mrgreen:

I don't say Canyon is "bad bike" , just express thoughts after seeing several various tests of "tour" .

_________________
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain


I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that ;)


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 391
Do you consider the kamm tail aero frames to be "true aero"? E.g. Trek madone or Scott foil?

_________________
AX Lightness Vial Evo, Carl Strong Titanium


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Posts: 1203
Location: NorthEU
eric01, great question. I've read and been told both that they are and also been told that they are not.
I don't really know how i can answer that, i don't find i have means to contradict any of the claims.
I have owned a Scott Foil and i did not really like the ride feel of it.
I took a long time for me to grasp that it came down to the frame.
I guess Look 795 could also be considered a true aero frame if Foil and Madone is!?
I also guess 795 is more comfortable, though i am not sure i like the massive integration of Looks recent frames.

_________________
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO D
Paduano Racing Fidia
Open *UP*
https://opencycle.com/showcase/xplr3r-1-by-rickard


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:08 pm
Posts: 222
Location: Bremerton, WA
"True aero" is pretty subjective IMO, but I'd say any frame designed with aerodynamics being (one of) the main focus would be considered an aero frame. Kamm tails tend to actually perform really well, and can beat airfoils in certain conditions. It also allows manufacturers to extend the "virtual airfoil" and still comply with the 3:1 rule. There is a reason the cars with the highest fuel economy are all shaped pretty much the same in the back (Prius, etc.)

_________________
Moloko Plus 6.24 kg

"We haven't located us yet"


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:40 am
Posts: 62
Haha, true. If you're already biased, a good wind tunnel doesn't help I guess.

As ITTY said, "true aero" is pretty subjective. For bike speeds and sizes, based on some CFD studies I've done (adjoint-based adapted mesh, finite element research code, for the engineers/fellow aero nerds here) you tend to gain about 20-50% drag for a well-designed Kammtail versus airfoil depending on crosswinds. They're useful mostly for structural reasons or (in the case of the vast majority of bike companies) if you don't have particularly well-designed airfoils. They're also beneficial for slower speeds (<15-20 mph, depending on wind), but I know that doesn't apply to any of us here. :P

Cervelo's S series, Giant's Propels, and Felt's AR series are all pretty similar in terms of aerodynamics, and do a fair amount better than others currently on the market. Everybody else is noticeably (5+ watts on average at least) worse aerodynamically, whether purposefully for handling/weight reasons or simply because they can't design for aerodynamics well enough.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:34 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:04 am
Posts: 556
wheelsONfire - I'm thinking about a Foil. What didn't you like about it? Cheeers.

_________________
Colnago M10 viewtopic.php?f=10&t=91208&hilit=colnago+m10+maob
Simplon Pavo III viewtopic.php?f=10&t=116069"


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Posts: 1203
Location: NorthEU
liam7020 wrote:
wheelsONfire - I'm thinking about a Foil. What didn't you like about it? Cheeers.


In short, it is a harsh ride. Especially if you ride a bit longer.

_________________
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO D
Paduano Racing Fidia
Open *UP*
https://opencycle.com/showcase/xplr3r-1-by-rickard


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:11 pm
Posts: 73
Location: Germany, Switzerland, France
stormur wrote:
Doesn't matter tunnel. doesn't matter procedure, nothing really matters in their tests , except 1 thing : German frame has to be winner , again :mrgreen:

I don't say Canyon is "bad bike" , just express thoughts after seeing several various tests of "tour" .



I live in Germany and yes.....Tour is indeed very well know for this :evil:
The results for German products (Cannyon, Stork, LW, etc...) are always "slightly" overestimated but this is business :twisted:
The only question is how much is "slightly" :P

_________________
currently: Colnago C60 SR 2015 6.4 kg/ Colnago Dream DA 7400/ Scott Scale XTR/ Scott Spark XTR


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:22 pm
Posts: 210
Kristoff made that Canyon look good this week.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 577
Location: Oop North
wheelsONfire wrote:
liam7020 wrote:
wheelsONfire - I'm thinking about a Foil. What didn't you like about it? Cheeers.


In short, it is a harsh ride. Especially if you ride a bit longer.


Bollocks. I had countless centuries as well as 200, 300 and 400 mile rides on both of mine. If you're worried about comfort just run some 25-28mm rubber and lower pressure.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. aero handlebars vs aero wheels vs aero frame

in Road

spectastic

7

1270

Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:34 pm

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. new bike obsession, aero quality of non-aero frames (Super S

in Road

tacostand

13

1886

Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:45 pm

DWatkinsBSB View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Selecting between an Aero Road bike vs a Time Trial bike?

in Road

THUNDERHORSE

6

853

Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:04 am

pdlpsher1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. TT or regular aero frame?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

addictR1

37

1994

Sat Oct 03, 2015 5:59 pm

Calnago View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lightest bike on the forum ever

in Road

craciunptr

1

777

Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:24 pm

kgt View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dalex, Exabot [Bot], hlvd, MSNbot Media and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited