GP4000s ii vs GP4000s clincher-Improved or not?

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Unbrokenchain
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:09 pm

by Unbrokenchain

Is the newer clincher version of the Conti GP4000 really an improvement over the older? I heard the sidewalls may be thinner. I need a good race tire that has more puncture protection than the Vittoria Open Corsa which I have had a run of bad luck with. Also is it really true that t 25s are actually faster than 23s?

Thanks for help and suggestions (yes I know I should go tubular but can't afford new wheels right now so looking for best clincher).

rowdysluggins
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:36 am
Location: Taylosville, Utah

by rowdysluggins

I'm a big fan of the 4000S's and as far as I can tell, the only difference between them is that the new II's are available in colors, and a 700x28 width.

by Weenie


cyclenutnz
Posts: 762
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:18 am
Location: Cambridge, New Zealand
Contact:

by cyclenutnz

25s have worse aero and no advantage for rolling resistance. In fact my 25mm GP4000s have markedly worse RR than 23s I've tested (presumably because they made an update and the 25s are from before that). I haven't tested any MkII 25mms - hopefully the construction is standardised so there is no RR penalty.
http://www.speedtheory.co.nz
http://www.velogicfit.com - 3D Motion Capture and Frame Finder Software

User avatar
Calnago
Posts: 5661
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago

I just rode a new set of version 25mm 4000s II's down in Arizona for a week. Don't know what the difference is between the plain 4000s. I used to run 4000s in 23mm. I do not believe the 25's are "faster" than 23's. Guess they're more comfortable by virtue of more air volume however. And I hear what you're saying about the Vittoria Open Corsa CX's. My experience with the Vittorias was that they cut just from looking at them sideways.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ

project3
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:18 am

by project3

new colors, new glossy packaging,new wider options - LBS selling USD 2 more.

bombertodd
Posts: 441
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:23 am
Contact:

by bombertodd

Out of curiosity, are your Vittoria's, Open Corsa I, II, or III? I noticed a big difference in durability (new ones are better) from the original.

User avatar
spookyload
Posts: 1018
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:47 am
Location: Albuquerque, NM

by spookyload

With everyone blowing the GP4000 tires out at ~$38, the new version would have to be pretty amazing to justify a 100% increase in price.

spdntrxi
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:11 pm

by spdntrxi

^ can't really compare in that manner... I use the 25's v2... but used v1 in 23.. so no direct comparison. I like the 25's very much.

User avatar
WMW
in the industry
Posts: 855
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Location: Ruidoso, NM

by WMW

cyclenutnz wrote:25s have worse aero and no advantage for rolling resistance. In fact my 25mm GP4000s have markedly worse RR than 23s I've tested (presumably because they made an update and the 25s are from before that). I haven't tested any MkII 25mms - hopefully the construction is standardised so there is no RR penalty.


That's interesting. Should have lower Crr... same casing, tread and everything, just bigger.

What was "updated"?
formerly rruff...

eric
Posts: 2196
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Contact:

by eric

spookyload wrote:With everyone blowing the GP4000 tires out at ~$38, the new version would have to be pretty amazing to justify a 100% increase in price.


Note the gp4000 and gp4000s are different tires.

spartan
Posts: 1100
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am

by spartan

http://www.slowtwitch.com/Products/Thin ... _3946.html


conti's own data proves wider is lower rr.
Current Rides:

2017 Giant TCR Advanced SL 0 DI2 9150

Ozrider
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:06 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

by Ozrider

I'm with WMW and spartan.
Tour magazine has also tested wider tyres and results show lower rolling resistance.
The pro peleton is moving to 25mm tyres due to lower rolling resistance, another effect is a slightly wider contact patch which provides more grip and they are generally able to run slightly lower pressures which improves comfort.
Sounds like a win/win/win to me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ozrider - Western Australia
Parlee Z5 XL (6055g/13.32lbs) Trek Madone 5.9 (7052-7500g)Jonesman Columbus Spirit (8680g)
Chase your dreams - it's only impossible until it's done

User avatar
rmerka
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:23 pm
Location: Austin, TX

by rmerka

You forgot heavier... win/win/win/lose

User avatar
WMW
in the industry
Posts: 855
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Location: Ruidoso, NM

by WMW

Ozrider wrote:The pro peleton is moving to 25mm tyres due to lower rolling resistance


The pros all ride tubulars on wide rims. a 25mm tubular is no wider than a 23mm clincher on a wide rim.

Another loser besides weight is aero.
formerly rruff...

by Weenie


User avatar
Calnago
Posts: 5661
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago

I'm curious... There's a lot of stuff out there (mostly marketing) that suggests wider is better, faster, blah blah blah. And people never seem to question it. I'm not sure I believe it all. If a 25 is faster than a 23, I can't seem to tell in the real world, and I've been trying. I have multiple sets of different wheels with different sized tires of the same brand. If I had to say which of my boras were faster between the ones with the 23mm Veloflex Carbons or the set with the 25mm Veloflex Arenbergs at this point I'd say the 23's are faster. The 25's are definitely more comfortable and more stable but for all out speed I gotta say I "think" the 23's would win out.
And even if it's all in my head above, I think it's safe to say that at some point a wider tire will in fact be slower without question simply due to the added friction between tire and road. You wouldn't want to run a motorcycle tire (if it would fit) for instance. As for what pros ride let's be real about the fact that pros ride, for the most part, what their sponsors tell them to ride. And for tubulars at least, I don't think a wider rim bed does squat. Different story for clinchers, admittedly, and from a money making size of martlet perspective, clinchers are where it's at. So it shouldn't be a big surprise that manufacturers want their riders on wider rims if it makes them sell, even though they're still running tubulars. I'll keep testing them out but at the end of the day if I can't experience a real benefit in something then as far as I'm concerned it's all hype.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post