BH a Ultralight mid-term ride report

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Post Reply
User avatar
willieboy
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:58 am

by willieboy

Some of you may have read my short term ride report on the 2013 BH Ultralight. My early impressions were it may be to much bike for me. This is due to the stiffness of its ride. The bike really is as advertised. A stiff pure bread race machine. While in the early days I was convinced I had bit off more than I could chew I have since found out differently. Mind you I needed to stick with it, make a few fit adjustments and put 25mm tires on her but now after 1,500 miles I know it belongs in the stable.

I'm a 55 year old rider. Weigh 152 pounds and 5'8.5" tall. The bike is a medium size. I'm just coming up on four years of riding in September and can honestly say this sport has changed my life. Not just the 60 pounds of weight loss but the lifestyle changes that cycling forces you to make are all worth while and then some. Enough about me. Back to the report.

The BH is of course, light. 747 grams for the frame and another 300 or so for the fork. I'm running Campagnolo SR11 with Ritchey WCS carbon seat-post and 100mm alloy stem. Easton EC90 aero bars in a 42. Specialized Romin Expert saddle, Look carbon blade pedals and Hed Jet 4 FR wheels with Continental GP4000S tires. Serfas cages and Lizard skin 2.5mm bar tape finishes off the ride. The bike weighs as pictured at 14.9 pounds. It's very stiff and responsive.

Notables are the bikes power transfer. What you give it is what you get. There is no flex in this bike. It climbs very well and holds speeds on the flats amazing. From a performance stand point this bike gets an A. It has made a huge difference in my ability to pull and keep up on the weekend group rides with the local bike shop. These guys are serious about their riding and it took me a little while to learn the ropes and get fit enough to stay with them. I credit much of that to this bike.

From a comfort stand point I give it a B. It's not uncomfortable but you do have to focus on getting out of the saddle a little more often and doing various stretches while riding. I wouldn't take this one on a century but that's what the Lynskey R230 is for :).

From a looks stand point I give it a B+. While I find it good to look at I would rather it had less white on it. I suppose there's a way to make the white BH logos black to get that stealth look but it's completely acceptable to the way it is.

Image

In summary the BH Ultralight is a no nonsense bike that will bring the best of you out on the road. The handling is crisp, it will take all you can give it and is acceptably comfortable. It's a great climber and descends on rails. I would think this bike would be a great asset to any racer, crit rider or serious weekend warrior.

petal666
Posts: 857
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:19 am
Location: Brisbane, Oz
Contact:

by petal666

The 2014 bike is all black with black decals.

If you used an alloy seatpost with setback (it doesn't look like you need it though), the any harshness in the ride would be reduced. I have the 2014 with a Thompsons post and find the ride fantastic.

by Weenie


NiFTY
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:26 pm

by NiFTY

I agree that setback would increase comfort, but that could throw off the seating position. Alloy is not more compliant than carbon as a rule.

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/12/ ... t_267560/3
Evo 5.02kg SL3 6.77 Slice RS 8.89 viewtopic.php?f=10&t=110579" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

petal666
Posts: 857
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:19 am
Location: Brisbane, Oz
Contact:

by petal666

Interesting comparison.

User avatar
kgt
Posts: 6717
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Athens, Greece

by kgt

Although it is somehow boring in terms of design I am sure it deserved a much higher percentage in the market. A real ww and a nice riding frame.

User avatar
mythical
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Location: Europe
Contact:

by mythical

Great writeup. I've been looking at the frameset for a while now, wondering about this bike's ride quality. It's a very enticing frame in terms of weight, design and finishing. It does seem a bit on the short (shorter TT) and high (longer HT) side for my liking, though nothing a lower and longer stem can't fix.

@petal666: I found my Thomson Masterpiece downright harsh. Good thing my Selle Italia SLR is so flexy. @NiFTY I agree about the seatpost, but in this case I believe a more forgiving saddle could help more.

As the OP suggests, this bike is probably better as a racing machine than a tourer.

A video I found: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeCQ7SM7iT4
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook

User avatar
willieboy
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:58 am

by willieboy

Thanks for the props on the write up. I was between this frame and the Cannondale EVO. Went with the BH on a recommendation and glad I did. Didn't hurt that I scored a large discount. It really is an amazing bike but it took some time for me to adjust to it :)

petal666
Posts: 857
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:19 am
Location: Brisbane, Oz
Contact:

by petal666

Here is a time lapse of me building mine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpfo1NQyB-A

by Weenie


User avatar
willieboy
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:58 am

by willieboy

That is very cool Petal. Enjoyed watching that and man do you work fast :)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post