HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
Posts: 414
Location: California's country side
I am looking for a cassette 10 spd 11-23..

the XG is lighter by a bit, and I read vs the previous OG it's got quieter, all steel durability so leaning towards the XG1090

XG cost a little more, how long does the Ti cogs on the CS-7900 last?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 395
Location: Haines, AK - Temporarily
The XGs got a bit quieter, but IME they're still not as quiet as Shimano cassettes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:01 pm 


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:31 am
Posts: 326
The largest four titanium cogs (17-19 and 21-23) on the 7900 series 11-23 ten speed cassette should last almost forever. How often do you ride in the big cogs? There is zero wear if you never shift into the big cogs. Where I live the big cogs are still brand new after the cassette's middle cogs are worn out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
Posts: 414
Location: California's country side
I would say a lot in the 23 for climbing but I don't think the larger cogs skips or wear that fast, it's the mid cassette that gets hammered that starts to skip when worn for my cassette.

The thing that seems attractive to me with the SRAM is like -30g if I am correct, which is quite a bit. Also I am running the 7900 group if that matters. The SRAM chain shifts and fit sloppy on the front and rear I would like to put back on CN-7901 soon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 395
Location: Haines, AK - Temporarily
The cn-7901 is probably the best 10 speed chain for shimano/sram users. Not just in shifting, but also from a friction/efficiency perspective.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:17 pm
Posts: 100
How does SRAM get down to ~140 grams on OG and XG cassettes using steel? Correct me if I'm wrong but these should outlast CS-7900 (steel + Ti)?

_________________
Pain truly is weakness leaving the body, provided that the pain inflicted is small enough that you can handle it and grow from it, emotionally or physically.

It Never Gets Easier, You Just Go Faster!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:09 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Seattle, WA | Gjøvik, Norway
Except the largest cog (and possibly smallest), the XG-1090 is machined out of a single piece of steel. Excerpt from SRAM description: "The whole cassette requires a machining process so complex and precise that each piece takes around seventy minutes to produce."

My version, 12-27T (155g), without the elastomer StealthRings is quite noisy.
Update: Fine-tuning cable tension for the rear derailleur seems to have reduced the noise level quite a bit. And gear changes are pretty flawless.

Image

_________________
(2012/2014) Scott Addict R1, SRAM Red 6.6kg | 2012 Scott Scale Pro, SRAM X0, 9.4kg


Last edited by n808 on Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:19 am
Posts: 843
On my 2012 RED group I have run everything SRAM, a 7900 cassette, and a 7900 chain. The quietest setup was everything SRAM. The 1091R chain on 7900 cassette was never as quiet (and it was fussy) and the 7900 chain never remotely impressed me.

So my vote would be 7900 cassette if you're running all Shimano now. I doubt the XG will shift as smoothly or quietly in that arrangement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:17 pm
Posts: 100
Ah, I missed the fine print https://www.sram.com/sram/road/products ... 0-cassette
Largest cog is made out of aluminum. Longevity it out of question for those of us who spend majority of time dancing on pedals.
From what I hear titanium cogs on CS-7900 can last up to 5k miles. Again, it all depends on terrain.

_________________
Pain truly is weakness leaving the body, provided that the pain inflicted is small enough that you can handle it and grow from it, emotionally or physically.

It Never Gets Easier, You Just Go Faster!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 1:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:09 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Seattle, WA | Gjøvik, Norway
Hmm, I did not realize the big cog was aluminum either. It looks and feels like the matte gray steel on my old 2004 11-23 Dura-Ace cassette. Hopefully it will last a while.

Fine-tuning cable tension for the rear derailleur seems to have reduced the noise level quite a bit. And gear changes are pretty flawless, compared to my previous PG-1070, which was bought used with more miles on it than the seller claimed.

_________________
(2012/2014) Scott Addict R1, SRAM Red 6.6kg | 2012 Scott Scale Pro, SRAM X0, 9.4kg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 1763
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
The large cog spreads the wear across more teeth than any other cog. You'd have to ride in it for most of most of your rides to wear it out. Most people wear out the smaller middle cogs first, like the 16t, even on cassettes with the larger cogs made from ti.

Supposedly the Sram red cassette large aluminium cogs are individually replaceable but they seem to be difficult to find.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 652
I had recon all alloy cassette. I'd get wear and chipped teeth only in the smallest cogs. I think the stress is greatest in that range since you're applying force over a smaller amount of teeth and you're most likely to lay down a 1500W sprint in your 11 cog than your 25T.
That said, I switched to XG 1090 last January and have had no issues with it. It worked both when I had Shimano and sram shifting.
IMO, the SRAM cassette is a better buy. Lighter, about the same cost, plenty quiet, shifts great, durable, and won't spontaneously explode because of a defective carbon carrier design.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 395
Location: Haines, AK - Temporarily
kulivontot wrote:
won't spontaneously explode because of a defective carbon carrier design.
There's no carbon carrier in the 10 speed designs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:09 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Loveland, CO
I have read some people have had their X Dome getting stuck on the freehub. I don't know if this is a common problem or not. Here's a post by a user on BikeRumor.

"I have had 2 XX cassettes get stuck on a Mavic body. Luckily, the the LBS and SRAM waranted the first, but now the replacement is stuck. The concept of these machined out cassettes is interesting but the interface is worthless. I am hoping that the interface of the XX1 is an improvement as I would like to switch to that group soon."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:43 pm 


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: XG-1090 vs CS-7900
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:31 am
Posts: 326
kulivontot wrote:
IMO, the SRAM cassette is a better buy. Lighter, about the same cost,


Same cost??? Performance Bike, a pretty big internet/mail-order parts supplier, has the 7900 cassette for $180 on sale and $250 MSRP. The SRAM XG 1090 Powerdome 10 speed cassette is priced at $335 and a MSRP of $335 too. The SRAM is not too far from being double the price.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], genesis692, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Rascal, tinozee, Yahoo [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. SRAM XG-1090, 12-27 : can stealth rings be added?

in Road

n808

2

339

Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:13 pm

n808 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 53/38T on dura-ace 7900 srm

in Road

dmoneysworks

6

477

Wed Nov 05, 2014 3:48 pm

octav View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Upgrading to dura-ace 7900 di2

in Road

fancycoconut

3

432

Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:48 pm

fancycoconut View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura Ace 7900 Chainrings

in Road

Feex

0

363

Fri Feb 14, 2014 4:22 am

Feex View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Looking to tune BR 7900 calipers

in Road

yumseyo

0

260

Sat May 10, 2014 4:03 pm

yumseyo View the latest post


It is currently Thu Nov 27, 2014 4:04 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB