HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 68
I have recently changed from my Rotor 3D crankset to a new LOOK ZED 2, but I feel the pedals are now placed wider than what im used to... I found the q-factor numers to be 149mm for the Rotor cranks, so it would be really helpful if someone here knew the exact numbers for the LOOK cranks? Thx!


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:31 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 170
Hi,

Why not measure to determine the precise width of your cranks as installed? If you still have the old crank, measure that one, too.

Do your pedals require spacers to fit flush to the Zed (or your old unit)?

I guess it goes without saying that you didn't change crank length...? The Zed has a few user-configurable lengths, so it's not a given that yours is set to the length you prefer. That could create the impression of a wider Q if set incorrectly.

Best,

Tim


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 68
Well, it would be the best to just measure the LOOK cranks I now have on my bike. But I don't know how to measure the q-factor correctly when the bike is installed on the bike.... The whole crank is one-piece, so any suggestion to do an accurate measurement is welcomed ;)

I do not use any spacers on the pedal-axels on my previous Rotor cranks. I have now tired to move the cleats on mye shoes a little bit so the shoes now are positioned more close to the cranks. Feels more alike now. It would just be nice to know the accurate difference between to two cranksets.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 2:16 am
Posts: 222
I can't imagine that Look doesn't provide this info somewhere...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 2263
I can't believe snorre can't work a tape measure or steel rule!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:44 pm
Posts: 118
just make a pencil mark on a stay and measure to each arm !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 1239
Location: Toronto
With a crank lining up with the seat tube, measure from the center of the seat tube to the outside edge of the crank. Tape measure or steel rule. Multiply the result by 2.

Since the cranks are presumably optimized for a LOOK frame, I'd not be surprised if their Q factor was a little less than an aftermarket crank that has to be able to work with a wide variety of frames.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:48 am
Posts: 1242
bikerjulio wrote:
With a crank lining up with the seat tube, measure from the center of the seat tube to the outside edge of the crank. Tape measure or steel rule. Multiply the result by 2.

Splitting hairs here, but this assumes that the cranks are symmetrical which may not be the case.

Check each side individually and add the measurements together.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5181
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
:exactly: Stages is coming out with a Q factor measuring device. It costs a little over half of competing devices. The device measures center to outside of left crank, then applies an algorithm* to determine Q factor.

* multiply by 2


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:22 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Attermann, chrisyu, dogg, mimason, MSN [Bot], zulu695 and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Q factor - SRAM crank vs. Hollowgram SISL

in Road

superdx

4

320

Thu May 14, 2015 2:46 am

superdx View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. How much weight to factor in for grease and lube?

in Road

Pan

12

575

Sat Jun 13, 2015 3:48 pm

11.4 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano FC-9000 crank or Rotor Q ring crank for BMC TMR01

in Road

gianimadrid

2

562

Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:17 pm

wheelsONfire View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Differences Rotor crank and Rotor SRM crank - swapping arms

in Road

Timmetje

3

659

Thu Dec 25, 2014 3:34 pm

Geoff View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Crank arm length??????

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

in Road

upside

63

4855

Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:25 am

wheelsONfire View the latest post


cron
It is currently Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:00 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB