Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:48 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 854
velonista wrote:


Is there any reason why your tests don't include a single "knock-off" Chinese carbon stem?



I'm guessing it's because fair wheel bikes doesn't stock or sell them? FWB is a store not Tour magazine. They really don't have any obligation to test every single item on the planet, especially if it encourages you to purchase a product from another vendor.

Having said that, I am disappointed there's no testing of Ritchey wcs 4 axis alloy version to see if the god awful faceplate design of the c260 has any merit on actually improving stiffness.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:56 pm
Posts: 736
Why would anyone in their right mind buy a fake or knock-off bike component? To save money? That's just ridiculous, especially since you can get real, good quality parts with RD and warranties behind them for affordable prices.

I think it would be absurd to include fakes in a test like this. They're irrelevant.

_________________
6.24kg CAAD10


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:47 am
Posts: 42
kulivontot wrote:
velonista wrote:


Is there any reason why your tests don't include a single "knock-off" Chinese carbon stem?



I'm guessing it's because fair wheel bikes doesn't stock or sell them? FWB is a store not Tour magazine. They really don't have any obligation to test every single item on the planet, especially if it encourages you to purchase a product from another vendor...


So what you're really saying is the ultimate aim of these tests is to sell brands of stems (and bars) that the tester's employer stocks in their store!

Hmmmmmmm! No agenda bias there! Right?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:56 pm
Posts: 736
There are a few stems in the test that Fairwheel doesn't sell. It's probably more about which stems they could get in time for the test.

_________________
6.24kg CAAD10


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:47 am
Posts: 42
:laughat:
drainyoo wrote:
Why would anyone in their right mind buy a fake or knock-off bike component? To save money? That's just ridiculous, especially since you can get real, good quality parts with RD and warranties behind them for affordable prices.

I think it would be absurd to include fakes in a test like this. They're irrelevant.

Adam Ant wrote:
...Goody two, goody two, goody goody two shoes...Subtle innuendoes follow...There must be something inside...
:lol:


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:02 pm
Posts: 394
So you don't actually have an answer...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:47 am
Posts: 42
Mackers wrote:
So you don't actually have an answer...


It's not obvious who your question is addressed to. But since it directly follows my last post, I'll seize the opportunity to reiterate what I already said:

velonista wrote:
...Because...there's no denying they work just as effectively as anything you care to compare them to...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 854
There's close to 20 stems here representing some of the most high performance models available on a fairly professional test bench. Yes, there is some bias in choosing which models to test but at the same time they're still a bunch of choices available and a lot of good data! I find no evidence that there's any fudging of data here nor any reason for FWB to fabricate data.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 854
There's close to 20 stems here representing some of the most high performance models available on a fairly professional test bench. Yes, there is some bias in choosing which models to test but at the same time they're still a bunch of choices available and a lot of good data! I find no evidence that there's any fudging of data here nor any reason for FWB to fabricate data.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:56 pm
Posts: 736
velonista wrote:
...Because...there's no denying they work just as effectively as anything you care to compare them to...


Says who, you?

Why would anyone want to make a case for fake bike parts? There's no logic to it.

_________________
6.24kg CAAD10


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:47 am
Posts: 42
drainyoo wrote:
...There's no logic to it.



Says who? You?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:56 pm
Posts: 736
Oh jeez, I'm moving on.

Thanks to Madcow and Fairwheel for the testing. Some great stuff here.

_________________
6.24kg CAAD10


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:43 pm
Posts: 2105
velonista wrote:
Hmmmmmmm! No agenda bias there! Right?


Dude, I think it's pretty simple, if you want to buy your stems from criminals, then buy your stems from criminals - but you have absolutely no right to expect that legitimate bike dealers should validate choices for you. FWB don't owe you anything, and they sure as hell don't owe anything to the forgers who are piggybacking on the work and investment of genuine cycling companies. You want forgeries to be tested alongside genuine products? Build your own test rig and do it yourself.



Back on topic, cool test! I've never liked carbon wrapped designs and it's nice to see that they really are crap :wink: OTOH, I also wonder how much difference it really makes. The only stems I've ridden that I thought were flexy enough to be detrimental (or even readily noticeable) to a ride are some old 2 bolt designs and Look's genuinely piss-poor new Aerostem.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:06 am
Posts: 968
Location: Perth, Western Australia
As the title goes - Stem Testing Round 1, I'm sure there will be a round 2

The FWB tests on cranks and hubs and now stems are a great source of useful info and unlike many other publications give accurate weights and the pros and cons of each product tested.

Thanks for the effort Madcow, I'm looking forward to your handlebar test as well.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Ozrider - Western Australia
Parlee Z5 XL (6055g/13.32lbs) Trek Madone 5.9 (7052-7500g)Jonesman Columbus Spirit (8680g)
Chase your dreams - it's only impossible until it's done


Last edited by Ozrider on Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 8:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:48 am
Posts: 1529
Location: Vienna Austria
Thanks again for doing the test!

_________________
godzuki26 wrote:
She is not allowed to run spacers under the stem. It must look good. It must be slammed. She does Yoga and Crossfit so she is getting into a pro position whether she likes it or not. Lol. She thinks cycling is easy. She needs to be schooled.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Road bar testing Round 2

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

madcow

15

1363

Fri Apr 29, 2016 10:28 am

rorz View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Best all round wheelset

[ Go to page: 14 5 6 7 8 ]

in Road

muntos

107

17298

Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:56 pm

muntos View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Creaking Seatpost - Out of Round?

in Road

SgtRock

5

374

Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:07 pm

SgtRock View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Speedweenies Data and Testing Aggregation Thread

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

RyanH

16

1113

Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:55 am

53x12 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Real World Aero Testing via Chung Method - Data Thread

[ Go to page: 18 9 10 11 12 ]

in Road

RyanH

177

13467

Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:21 am

zappafile123 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AZR3, Bing [Bot], fabriciom, faucon, motorthings, MSNbot Media, nismosr, Yahoo [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited