Dogma 60.1 (2009) vs. Dogma 65.1 geometry

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Post Reply
Permon
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:52 am

by Permon

Hello guys,

I am just wondering what differences are between Dogma 60.1 (2009) and Dogma 65.1 geometry.
For example, if You look at geo of size 560 (c-c)..... it looks like Dogma 65.1 seat tube (c-t) is -5mm shorter, also the head tube is -5mm shorter and finally the stack is -5mm lower. (the other dimensions are almost identical for both frames)

What surprises me is the BB drop of Dogma 65.1 which is -72mm (quite low comparing to majority of bikes)
I have not found any info on BB drop of Dogma 60.1 (2009)

Am I right thinking they just lowered the "height" of the frame by 5mm?
Is Dogma's 60.1 BB drop also -72mm?
(it looks like industry standard is more like -68mm. -72mm makes Dogma sitting quite low....)

Thanx for Your inputs.

haydos
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:53 pm
Location: Bells Beach, AUS

by haydos

bbkt drop is the same, they lowered the ht after feedback from Team Sky.
Current Quiver:
Cervelo Aspero, Dura Ace 12
Time RXR, Record 10sp
Colnago C40 Mapei

In the past:
C59 x 2, EPS, Dogma2, Dogma, Caad 12, SuperSix HM, BMC RM01, Focus Izalco, Scott Foil, Cervelo R3SL, BMC SLC01, S-Works Tarmac, TCR

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply