HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:48 am
Posts: 1155
Location: Central USA
Speaking about the "penalty" for aero - there sure seems to be in most of the comparisons. For those who were able to see the chart on page 5, in the overall rankings for the combined "performance" of those pairs of bikes - the non aero partner was ranked better (and generally MUCH better) overall than the aero partner in 7 of the 12 paired situations. It was a tie with 3, and the aero beat it's partner in only 2 situations.......but one was the Stork whose "aero" model truly sucked in the aero category but shined in comfort and stiffness (so a mis-categorized frame). So in my view the true aero frames were outright winners only once (8%). For those that didn't see the chart that performance ranking included the effect of aero but also comfort and stiffness where it counts.

So it's not as simple as why not......but is it worth it?........

Added side note about the Giant aero "module" - I seem to recall a review posted by a major source (Velo? CyclingNews?) that suggested the aero improvements were significantly positively influenced by the integrated stem and bars - which conflicts with a post here suggesting that it may be a disadvantage (compared to the Zipp used with the others). The article as I recall suggested that the lack of choices (bar angle and shape) was a significant compromise the end user would have to put up with.

Don't get me wrong - I am in support of aero - but not extremes that result in an overall detriment to the overall picture.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:49 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7460
Location: Geeeelong!
Not performing in the Tour test does not mean the Aernario is mis-categorised.

It was just that much better than the other aero offerings in judging on aspects unrelated to aerodynamics.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:49 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:15 pm
Posts: 166
Would like to see a similar test for 100 mile rides comparing ultra stiff vs compliant.

_________________
Colnago C-59 Italia PR99 colour schema
Shimano Ultegra 6800
Shimano Dura Ace C-24

Trek 5200
Shimano Ultegra 6500
Mavic krysium Elite


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:48 pm
Posts: 23
Mr.Gib wrote:
SolidSnake03 wrote:
So all im seeing here is stuff that is so tightly clustered given the length of time of the test that aero wise your frame choice is largely irrelevant.


Which is what I have been saying since aero frames arrived on the scene, accept of course when it comes to wheel and tire options. Then choosing an aero frame become highly relevant as in it becomes a major nuisance. Mostly just heavier, and less comfortable. A true detriment for 95% of the people that ride them. Just try your S5 on some fresh chip-seal. :P

And who spends 4 plus hours exposed and solo in competition?? Don't we have time trial bike for that nonsense?? :noidea:

Whole thing is a bit of a scam IMO.


I agree with this although, im not a sprinter & when it comes to winning a race. Alot comes down to a TT Effort in a Solo Break.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 652
Measure new frame weights to a .1 of a gram with/without paint, but don't waste my time with meaningless aero data. Everybody knows bikes are only meant to go up 25% gradients at 3mph.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Athens, Greece
The fact is that actual weight is measurable in an absolute way while actual aero performance is rather debatable.

_________________
My 6696gr Cipollini Bond
My 8618gr Colnago Master X-light
My 9745gr Pinarello Dyna


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 652
Aero is measurable, the physics is just more complicated than m x g x h. All I'm saying is you can't argue that a 1% performance improvement is worthless outside of a pro level and then claim dropping 20g is in anyway significant. You can argue the measurements may be inaccurate or inconsistent, but the "performance gains are too minimal to matter" argument doesn't hold.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:48 pm
Posts: 23
Considering professionals ride the same weight (6.8) kg

Its really is all about he Aero...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

_________________
Using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 8:33 pm
Posts: 89
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
It's not all about aero. If a pro is in a 5 hour stage and has another one the next day, the last thing he/she wants is to be on a potentially harsh riding aero frame that causes fatigue.

_________________
Long live the horizontal top tube, standard crankset, and Italian threaded bottom bracket.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 963
Location: Sweden
The equation for having it all; aero, compliance/comfort and sharp handling is actually quite simple...

It goes a little something like this:

N+1

_________________
Roadbike
Planet X Stealth w/ drop bars

Mountainbike
Van Nicholas Zion Ti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7371
Location: San Francisco, CA
Sorry for rehashing this older thread, but I read through the whole thing and I want to see the original articles, but don't think the months were documented. I think Feb is the aero bikes. What about the light bikes?

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am
Posts: 1229
Location: by Crystal Springs (Sawyer Creek Trail)
There is a very very important thread regarding "comfort" that a lot of people here need to read. Nowadays, aero bikes can fully take advantage of large 25c tires, are very very stiff, and only show a penalty with regards to weight. Damn near everything else has been sorted. Things have changed in the months since that test was conducted.

http://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/Thoughts ... _4571.html

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/forum/Slowt ... _P5231787/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:21 am 
Online

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:06 am
Posts: 778
Location: Perth, Western Australia
The rider is still the biggest "aero" factor, and as we are all different shapes and sizes, have varying flexibility and positioning on the bike and wear different helmets, clothing and shoes, the variables are just mind boggling.
As a total package you could have a rider on a round tube bike with shallow alloy rims be more aero than a different rider on an aero bike with deep carbon rims purely due to size and position on the bike



Image


Parlee Z5, Trek Madone, Colnago Dream,

_________________
Ozrider - Western Australia
Parlee Z5 XL 2011 (6055g/13.32lbs) Raleigh RC Ltd 2008 (7.6kg) Reynolds 653 Custom 1990 (9.8kg, now 8.8kg)
The accumulation of marginal gains is what makes the difference between winning and losing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am
Posts: 1229
Location: by Crystal Springs (Sawyer Creek Trail)
Sure, but that's a very strange comparison. Like for like (position, equipment, etc), a rider will be faster on the more aerodynamic bike.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:59 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7460
Location: Geeeelong!
Ozrider it's not about how aero a complete set up is between two different riders, but more so what a rider can benefit from simply having a more aero road bike - as opposed to a more traditional set up.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:59 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 19  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], maverick_1, micropox, mike, Wielrenner and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Are all the Boardman SLS frames the same?

in Road

BigPoser

3

516

Mon Oct 27, 2014 12:38 pm

Philbar72 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Women's Carbon Frames

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

Valbrona

22

1173

Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:52 pm

wingguy View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sub 800 gram frames, $2500 or less

in Road

carhillclimb

7

1250

Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:24 am

Jere View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aluminium Frames/Build

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

digger

17

1985

Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:39 am

theosaurus View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. XACD Ti frames experience

in Road

Phill P

8

1871

Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:19 pm

dvincere View the latest post


It is currently Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:32 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB