Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sat Aug 27, 2016 2:37 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 519 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:26 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
Saw this on another forum, from Cervelo's twitter account:

Image

These are the results from a recent Tour test. I don't know the details of how the test was performed.

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 573
This recently showed up on Cervelo's Twitter

https://twitter.com/cervelo/status/435843774439501826/photo/1

It's only the results; I gather the full article with all the parameters will soon be on http://tour-int.com/

According to the Twitter comments on Cervelo's link, the difference between the best and worst aero frame is less that 1% of time difference over ~4hrs19m.


In bold are the "non-aero" frames

4:17:11 Cervelo S5
4:17:34 Merida Reacto EVO
4:17:51 BMC Time Machine TMRO1
4:18:01 Giant Propel Advanced SLO
4:18:02 Specialized S-Works Venge
4:18:06 Simplon Nexico
4:18:18 Scott Foil Team
4:18:25 Cervelo R5
4:18:29 Canyon Aeroad CF
4:18:33 Neil Pryde Bura S1
4:18:37 Scott Addict SL
4:18:45 Neil Pryde Alize
4:18:46 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX
4:18:48 Giant TCR Advanced SL
4:18:52 Ridley Noah Fast
4:18:54 BMC Time Machine SLR 01
4:18:56 Rose Xeon CW-8800
4:18:57 Simplon Pavo 3
4:19:04 Storck Fascenario 0.6
4:19:05 Storck Aerario
4:19:07 Specialized S-Works Tarmac
4:19:12 Ridley Helium SL
4:19:27 Rose Xeon CR5
4:19:42 Merida Scultura CF Team


Last edited by User Name on Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:44 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:33 am
Posts: 220
::popcorn::

This should be interesting


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 5485
Location: Athens, Greece
Cervelo presents a comparative test in which the best aero and non-aero frames are both Cervelo. Ok...

_________________
My 6696gr Cipollini Bond
My 8618gr Colnago Master X-light


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:54 pm
Posts: 339
The difference between Venge and Tarmac is 00:01:05. Foil and Addict is 19 seconds. Some aero frames are slower than their "lighter brothers".

So, I believe that, buying a lighter frame, which can climb better and does not effect from sidewinds that much is a better idea.

_________________
My Orbea Orca
My Stava
My Instagram


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 1056
Location: The Lone Star State
Economics Teacher: [takes attendance] Madone? Madone? Madone?
Economic Student Simone: Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Madone pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.
Economics Teacher: Thank you, Simone.
Economic Student Simone: No problem whatsoever.
Economics Teacher: [continues with attendance] Dogma? Dogma? Dogma?

_________________
I own a lot of Treks


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 395
Location: Haines, AK - Temporarily
They tested "Light Frames" but didn't include a SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
I am surprised it took so long for someone to post this. Key is the test protocol because these tests can be very easily administered to yield very different results. Yaw range, weighting, bottle or not, bar height/width, rider/dummy rider or not, etc.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 2291
Location: Pedal Square
On top of what elviento says, I'd like to see a number of what would comprise a statistically significant difference, given the test measurement inaccuracies and so forth. Say 30 seconds of 4:18 hours (15480 seconds) are about 0.2%, I would be surprised if the test setup was so accurate. Might just as well see jitter here? Maybe not between the fastest and slowest, but with those in between.

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 645
I vaguely recall Velo magazine testing the propel better than the Cervelo previously...

_________________
Trek Mad-one 7 Series team colours http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=115500&start=15


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 3:40 am
Posts: 481
Location: Triange, NC
Well, without knowing more about the test protocol and conditions its difficult to draw too many conclusions other than aero frames are more a marketing tool than a performance advantage tool.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 am
Posts: 852
Location: Utah
I couldn't agree more.

&

rijndael wrote:
They tested "Light Frames" but didn't include a SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod?

:goodpost: Highly Suspect.....


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:21 am
Posts: 95
kgt wrote:
Cervelo presents a comparative test in which the best aero and non-aero frames are both Cervelo. Ok...


The sad part is that there will be people who don't see that as a problem. Or the fact that there are a bunch of popular frames not included in the "test".


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

_________________
Specialized S-Works Tarmac Sagan WC Edition
Specialized S-Works Tarmac Disc - Stealth
Specialized S-Works Venge Cavendish Edition


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:30 pm
Posts: 481
*Links removed*

They changed the test procedure a little bit from last year. Use half-body mannequin from torso down with rotating legs. Make sure you read the rest though.

The frames that weren't in the test were either not given by the manufacturers (for whatever reason) or didn't make the deadline for the article. (there were two frames for the latter case).

WIll try to upload the 'light' frames test sometimes tomorrow.


Last edited by ichobi on Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:48 am
Posts: 1220
Location: Central USA
Rider or no rider - they need to make that clear.

While it's nice to see how one frame/bike directly stacks against another - it's not so relevent when you take into consideration that a rider is a non negotiable part of each bike ride and contributes a lot to the movement of air around the frame.

To me a test with no "dummy" (like the DZ dummy) means little for real life buying decisions.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 519 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. new bike obsession, aero quality of non-aero frames (Super S

in Road

tacostand

13

2160

Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:45 pm

DWatkinsBSB View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Do Aero Road Bars look ok on Non Aero frames

[ Go to page: 13 4 5 6 7 ]

in Road

dreden513

95

5974

Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:51 am

NGtim View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. aero handlebars vs aero wheels vs aero frame

in Road

spectastic

7

1539

Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:34 pm

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. TOUR MAG AERO TEST 2016

[ Go to page: 127 28 29 30 31 ]

in Road

spartan

453

39024

Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:41 am

Kayrehn View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero+ Caliper Brakes VS Non Aero + Disc Brake Road Bikes

in Road

Jmdesignz2

7

1500

Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:35 pm

BeeSeeBee View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], coppercook62, Yahoo [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited