Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:24 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 519 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 2165
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
Saw this on another forum, from Cervelo's twitter account:

Image

These are the results from a recent Tour test. I don't know the details of how the test was performed.

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
   
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:26 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 593
This recently showed up on Cervelo's Twitter

https://twitter.com/cervelo/status/435843774439501826/photo/1

It's only the results; I gather the full article with all the parameters will soon be on http://tour-int.com/

According to the Twitter comments on Cervelo's link, the difference between the best and worst aero frame is less that 1% of time difference over ~4hrs19m.


In bold are the "non-aero" frames

4:17:11 Cervelo S5
4:17:34 Merida Reacto EVO
4:17:51 BMC Time Machine TMRO1
4:18:01 Giant Propel Advanced SLO
4:18:02 Specialized S-Works Venge
4:18:06 Simplon Nexico
4:18:18 Scott Foil Team
4:18:25 Cervelo R5
4:18:29 Canyon Aeroad CF
4:18:33 Neil Pryde Bura S1
4:18:37 Scott Addict SL
4:18:45 Neil Pryde Alize
4:18:46 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX
4:18:48 Giant TCR Advanced SL
4:18:52 Ridley Noah Fast
4:18:54 BMC Time Machine SLR 01
4:18:56 Rose Xeon CW-8800
4:18:57 Simplon Pavo 3
4:19:04 Storck Fascenario 0.6
4:19:05 Storck Aerario
4:19:07 Specialized S-Works Tarmac
4:19:12 Ridley Helium SL
4:19:27 Rose Xeon CR5
4:19:42 Merida Scultura CF Team


Last edited by User Name on Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:44 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:33 am
Posts: 220
::popcorn::

This should be interesting


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 6395
Location: Athens, Greece
Cervelo presents a comparative test in which the best aero and non-aero frames are both Cervelo. Ok...

_________________
My 6560gr TIME Skylon
My 9733gr COLNAGO Master X-light


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:54 pm
Posts: 357
The difference between Venge and Tarmac is 00:01:05. Foil and Addict is 19 seconds. Some aero frames are slower than their "lighter brothers".

So, I believe that, buying a lighter frame, which can climb better and does not effect from sidewinds that much is a better idea.

_________________
My Orbea Orca
My Stava
My Instagram


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 1241
Location: The Lone Star State
Economics Teacher: [takes attendance] Madone? Madone? Madone?
Economic Student Simone: Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Madone pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.
Economics Teacher: Thank you, Simone.
Economic Student Simone: No problem whatsoever.
Economics Teacher: [continues with attendance] Dogma? Dogma? Dogma?

_________________
Madone 9 https://goo.gl/7UwZpV

Crockett https://goo.gl/f5PdCN

Madone 5 https://goo.gl/cMdyFo

Madone 4, SpeedConcept, Cobia

I own a lot of Treks.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 395
Location: Haines, AK - Temporarily
They tested "Light Frames" but didn't include a SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
I am surprised it took so long for someone to post this. Key is the test protocol because these tests can be very easily administered to yield very different results. Yaw range, weighting, bottle or not, bar height/width, rider/dummy rider or not, etc.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 2292
Location: Pedal Square
On top of what elviento says, I'd like to see a number of what would comprise a statistically significant difference, given the test measurement inaccuracies and so forth. Say 30 seconds of 4:18 hours (15480 seconds) are about 0.2%, I would be surprised if the test setup was so accurate. Might just as well see jitter here? Maybe not between the fastest and slowest, but with those in between.

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 871
I vaguely recall Velo magazine testing the propel better than the Cervelo previously...

_________________
Trek Mad-one 7 Series team colours http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=115500&start=15

Fuji SL 1.1 http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=140134&hilit=Fuji


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 3:40 am
Posts: 491
Location: Triange, NC
Well, without knowing more about the test protocol and conditions its difficult to draw too many conclusions other than aero frames are more a marketing tool than a performance advantage tool.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 am
Posts: 852
Location: Utah
I couldn't agree more.

&

rijndael wrote:
They tested "Light Frames" but didn't include a SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod?

:goodpost: Highly Suspect.....


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:21 am
Posts: 113
kgt wrote:
Cervelo presents a comparative test in which the best aero and non-aero frames are both Cervelo. Ok...


The sad part is that there will be people who don't see that as a problem. Or the fact that there are a bunch of popular frames not included in the "test".


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

_________________
Specialized S-Works Tarmac Sagan WC Edition
Specialized S-Works Venge Cavendish Edition
Salsa Warbird Brooks Limited Edition


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:03 pm 
Online

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:30 pm
Posts: 563
*Links removed*

They changed the test procedure a little bit from last year. Use half-body mannequin from torso down with rotating legs. Make sure you read the rest though.

The frames that weren't in the test were either not given by the manufacturers (for whatever reason) or didn't make the deadline for the article. (there were two frames for the latter case).

WIll try to upload the 'light' frames test sometimes tomorrow.


Last edited by ichobi on Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:03 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:48 am
Posts: 1261
Location: Central USA
Rider or no rider - they need to make that clear.

While it's nice to see how one frame/bike directly stacks against another - it's not so relevent when you take into consideration that a rider is a non negotiable part of each bike ride and contributes a lot to the movement of air around the frame.

To me a test with no "dummy" (like the DZ dummy) means little for real life buying decisions.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 519 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Home Made Aero Spin Down Test of 2 Top Wheels

[ Go to page: 13 4 5 6 7 ]

in Road

cyclespeed

91

5009

Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:22 am

cyclespeed View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero test. Trek Madone, Venge, Cervleo S5, Giant Propel & Canyon Aeroad

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

User Name

37

5093

Mon May 29, 2017 10:50 am

Shrike View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. handlebars Easton EC90 Aero vs EC70 Aero

in Road

westwood

6

1821

Wed May 10, 2017 7:43 pm

dak View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero bars on non aero race bike

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

gurk700

16

2234

Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:32 pm

kode54 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Light options for aero bikes?

in Road

mariovalentim

5

497

Thu Jun 08, 2017 6:59 am

jekyll man View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: andylav, Google Adsense [Bot], JScycle, Mtek, reknop, retired, Rogeliote, sawyer and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited