HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 963
Location: Sweden
Also, for very short reach it is generally smarter to go for a shorter stem and/or shorter reach handlebars than a super short top tube (talking 47-50cm TT's here) as you'll get in trouble with either toe overlap or crazy geometries (like 74 degree STA/71 degree HTA with longish rake forks) that just isn't conductive to good handling only to overcome the toe overlap issues...

And people.bringing up that short stems automatically means sketchy handling are just regurgitating hogwash they've heard without really understanding how a bikes steering capabilities actually function in regards to trail, weight distribution, fork angles, etc.

_________________
Roadbike
Planet X Stealth w/ drop bars

Mountainbike
Van Nicholas Zion Ti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:23 am
Posts: 374
I agree 100% DMF! My wife struggled with toe overlap on some demo bikes that came with a 100mm or great stem. She finally found a Pinarello 47cm with a 70mm stem is perfect. She's had no problem turning above 50 mph either. She's 5'3" if you're wondering.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:05 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:59 am
Posts: 36
Location: portland, oregon
I would guess buying a shorter stem on the bike that fits would suffice?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:55 pm 
Offline
Shop Wrench
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 6:30 am
Posts: 85
Location: Gloucester, UK
Scappa Racy Tracy :D

_________________
www.southwestbikebuilders.co.uk

https://www.facebook.com/pages/South-We ... 4745587802


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:25 am
Posts: 907
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Franklin wrote:
You all realize that a "woman's bike" is beyond ridiculous from a bodymetry standpoint? The differences between women and men are negligable in this regard.


I think we kind of get that. But if you are a 'short reach/high stack' kind of person, women's specific frames have become a useful starting point when looking for a new frame ... assuming they aren't just regular frames with a splash of pink paint.

Said by someone who used to race on custom-built steel frames in the 1980s.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:09 am
Posts: 346
Valbrona wrote:
I think we kind of get that.


1. Considering there's a market I'd say a lot of people don't get that.
2. I have been in several threads here where indeed knowledgable users were touting how company x or Y made Woman specific frames. Again, body metry data shows that these very knowledgable people were just as bamboozled as many others. And no I don't blame (or name) them as being a stud on cycling tech does not mean you know that differences between female and male biometry is pretty much a wash.

Even in this thread someone says "and the very few that are truly designed with different geometry, different carbon layup etc"

That's just such patent nonsense that it needs to be pointed out. there is no need for a different geometry and certainly no need for a "different carbon layup" (that one cracks me up on male models, let alone female models).

So Valbrona, you seem to get it, but obviously still people ned to be corrected.

Furthermore, if a company runs a female frame chances that exact size is also at the (much, much better equiped!) male model are enormous. Whcih is of course because the bike companies know that there is absolutely no difference between the geometries. It's easy money!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:51 pm
Posts: 305
Xtra Small sized - Giant Propel Advanced SL or TCR Advance SL 0 ISP, both available as frame only

http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-au/bik ... 880/66594/
http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb/bik ... 969/68381/

Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:43 pm
Posts: 572
Franklin wrote:
Furthermore, if a company runs a female frame chances that exact size is also at the (much, much better equiped!) male model are enormous. Whcih is of course because the bike companies know that there is absolutely no difference between the geometries. It's easy money!


Well, if I'm nitpicking, most of the womens specific bikes our shop deals with are different to the mens geometries... usually by less than 5mm!

One exception mentioned in the OP is the Spesh Amira which is considerably shorter reach for a given stack in its smallest sizes than the Tarmac, but that's only because the Tarmac doesn't get any shorter in reach from 54 down. In fact, if you then compare the Amira to a mens / unisex bike that simply has endurance geometry like the Scott Solace and in the smallest sizes the Solace gains only 1.6mm in reach but a full 13.7mm in stack. A Cervelo R-series at its smallest also has 2mm higher stack and 5mm shorter reach.

So why focus on looking for womens geometry instead of endurance geometry?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Foghat, Gearjunkie, Google Adsense [Bot], mnmasotto, tmr5555, Yahoo [Bot], Zitter, zwingz and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Leading makers of 'production' carbon fiber road frames

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

in Road

Fourthbook

72

4306

Fri Sep 05, 2014 3:11 pm

phatphuk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New aero test: 12 aero frames vs 12 "unaero" light frames

[ Go to page: 1 ... 17, 18, 19 ]

in Road

fa63

280

23383

Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:37 pm

dunbar42 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Are all the Boardman SLS frames the same?

in Road

BigPoser

3

517

Mon Oct 27, 2014 12:38 pm

Philbar72 View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Sub-$1000 sub-900g Frames?

in Road

PDXWheels

1

572

Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:47 pm

aaric View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sub 800 gram frames, $2500 or less

in Road

carhillclimb

7

1250

Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:24 am

Jere View the latest post


It is currently Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:32 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB