Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Fri Dec 09, 2016 1:14 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:16 pm
Posts: 443
I had some 404 FC's last year and loved them, really decent wheels- and the braking (with SwissStop Black Prince pads) was great.

I'd prefer to keep that level of braking, absolutely- huge confidence when coming into a hairpin a bit "hot" in the mountains.

How do the most recent HED rims compare to Zipp in the braking department?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:22 am
Posts: 1407
Location: Zion
Like most things in life, it's all about trade-off's.

The lower the price, the more interested I'd be in the Reynolds Attacks. I rode a first-gen set for years and they were great; no issues.

I'm intrigued by the Zipp clincher 202 FC's, but wished they were lighter (~1.3kg). I've looked into building a set of clincher Enve 25's, but they're only marginally lighter as a set (~25-50g) and more expensive.

Furthermore, I'm dubious of the amount of aero superiority from the 202's. I'm willing to believe they're aero, but don't think they blow the others out of the water. Better? Sure, maybe some.

_________________
My ~5.7kg / ~12.67lb Addict R1

My ~9.3kg / ~20.5lb Scale 29 Pro


Top
   
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:08 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:04 pm
Posts: 22
Ok thanks for all the replies

So to surmise irrespective of cost peoples view is that zipps have a better braking surface?

Weight is much the same as the 2014 attacks are 1365g


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:58 am
Posts: 4
Both are gorgeous wheels and I looked at them about a month ago as well as the 404's. In the end, my brain took over and I decided to try a pair of Fulcrum Racing Zero's that I got in the January sales at £599 for pre-season work and look at the Zipp's again in April. 1200 miles on and I've forgotten about the Zipps as the Racing Zero's bang for buck is just unbelievable. Light, stiff and awe inspiring at speed, my only big task at the moment is trying to find another pair for the same price as spares/future swaps.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:04 pm
Posts: 22
perfectpink wrote:
Both are gorgeous wheels and I looked at them about a month ago as well as the 404's. In the end, my brain took over and I decided to try a pair of Fulcrum Racing Zero's that I got in the January sales at £599 for pre-season work and look at the Zipp's again in April. 1200 miles on and I've forgotten about the Zipps as the Racing Zero's bang for buck is just unbelievable. Light, stiff and awe inspiring at speed, my only big task at the moment is trying to find another pair for the same price as spares/future swaps.


Are the racing zeros carbon? What is your weight?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 1082
Location: The Lone Star State
GregSherwin wrote:
Ok thanks for all the replies

So to surmise irrespective of cost peoples view is that zipps have a better braking surface?

Weight is much the same as the 2014 attacks are 1365g


not exactly the comparison, but my 303's vs my old DV3K's (same braking surface - Ctg), I can confirm that the Zipps stop better.

_________________
I own a lot of Treks


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 620
Location: Oop North
FIJIGabe wrote:
GregSherwin wrote:
Ok thanks for all the replies

So to surmise irrespective of cost peoples view is that zipps have a better braking surface?

Weight is much the same as the 2014 attacks are 1365g


not exactly the comparison, but my 303's vs my old DV3K's (same braking surface - Ctg), I can confirm that the Zipps stop better.


DV3K models are all pre-CTg. My Attacks and RZR's brake better than Zipps. Also, if you're not going for 2014 model Zipps then you get poorly designed hubs that will grenade on you.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 1082
Location: The Lone Star State
I beg to differ. 2011 DV3K's were made with CT-g brake track. I had one, and made sure it had the improved track. They upgraded them for 2011, then phased them out (by downgrading the Assaults).

_________________
I own a lot of Treks


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:13 pm
Posts: 563
Location: Denmark. Yeeees
Grill wrote:
if you're not going for 2014 model Zipps then you get poorly designed hubs that will grenade on you.

Proff of this?

_________________
Custom Rychtarski steel bike
Ridley X-ride 10
Custom Wittson Ti


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 620
Location: Oop North
http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=40013&t=12930058


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:06 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 373
One person who bought second hand wheels is all you have?

C'mon now.

Besides the hub has been updated since then.

I've had 4 different 2012/2013 FireCrest wheels ('12/'13, 404, 808's) and continue to use my 2013 404's, none have had any issues. I've sold at least 25 sets of 2012/13, none have had any issues that I am aware of.

Just sayin.

_________________
carbonLORD.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5752
Location: Phoenix Arizona
And... that was a 3 year old (second hand) hub when it was posted 3/4 of a year ago...

There have been 12 series changes (with multiple updates per series change) to the 88 and 188 hubs since that was posted at Radar... Including directly addressing the drive side spoke carrying and (all) hub flanges.


I second that Zipp have the better brake track. I think it's the best available in cycling right now (though several companies are doing a pretty dang nice job) and that matters even more for clinchers.

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 620
Location: Oop North
http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=4053719
https://twitter.com/ttworldchamp/status/338388624481607680
http://forums.roadbikereview.com/wheels-tires/zipp-hubs-not-durable-299828-3.html

It's hardly an isolated incident. Why do a lot of Zipp sponsored athletes use different hubs if the current ones are the dog's? The 2014 hubs (188v9) have changed from radial to a virtual 3x on the drive side and have larger bearings which is a vast improvement. Sure lots of people have no problem with them, but lots of people also have no issue with Chinarellos. Doesn't make them infallible or even good. For the money there are countless better options out there. Of course if it's just the 'prestige' of riding Zipps, I can understand.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5752
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Every example you just posted is a model as old or older than the +/- 4 year old version you started with... I know the post dates are newer, but like the original post, the product is not...

If your point is that outdated product that is no longer available and nothing like what's available now is not the best choice, you're right.

But the hub flange cracks were resolved for the most part a couple of years (and several revs) ago...

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
   
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:44 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 620
Location: Oop North
Maybe, I still have no confidence in them, but given the opportunity I'd always go handbuilt.

Here's a newer example so 'most part' is still an issue for me. http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=4922088;


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 202 Firecrest clincher flex

in Road

thencameyou

8

1171

Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:10 am

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scratch in 2016 Zipp 202 Firecrest Carbon Clincher

in Road

Morta

5

639

Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:01 pm

em3 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 303 vs Zipp 404 chainstay rub

in Road

nemeseri

14

1416

Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:49 am

nemeseri View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What tubeless 25 mm tyres for Reynolds Assault

in Road

kingkongsfinger

12

885

Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:25 pm

kingkongsfinger View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Reynolds 2015 ctg braking performance?

in Road

nemeseri

8

483

Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:30 am

nemeseri View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], JackRussellRacing, kikis, kulcha, mrtkcmz, Yahoo [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited