Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:19 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:02 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 373
Another used 2011 model out of warranty....

_________________
carbonLORD.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 620
Location: Oop North
There's almost no difference between the v7 and v8 front hubs. Big changes for the v9 though.
The Zipp 88 front hub received an in-line change (February 2014) to increase durability & performance. The retaining ring that was previously used has been elimated(sic) and the spoke slot depth increased.

If the v8 was perfectly fine, why make changes to increase said metric for the v9? You hardly need a degree in deductive reasoning to reach the logical conclusion...

But hey, it's your money. You're free to do with it as you please.


Top
   
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:09 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:58 am
Posts: 258
Location: Chicago
For every person that complains about some product on an internet forum there are thousands out there that don't because they have no problem.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5752
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Grill wrote:
There's almost no difference between the v7 and v8 front hubs......
......
If the v8 was perfectly fine, why make changes to........



Which companies don't update their products exactly? (I mean the ones that can update, meaning they actually make their product versus shopping for parts...)


Zipp make constant changes because they can (they employ more degreed engineers than most wheel companies have total employees). They design, test and manufacture the 88/188 in the US. With that, they can make improvements whenever they like (to the rims as well... which have also been through multiple revs).


There were 4 - 8 different versions of the 88/188 hub done between 13' and the old products shown in the 4 threads you have posted.


There have been @12 versions between the current hub produced and the oldest Hub you have shown.


...

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:16 pm
Posts: 443
My update- I bought some HED Stinger 4 FR's as the UK's ENVE supplier wouldn't give me a price for the 3.4's.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 92
carbonLORD wrote:
Dammit wrote:
(Interested in this btw as I'm looking at 202 tubular vs 3.4 SES).


The only thing I can say is the FireCrest have a better braking surface and stop as well as an alloy clincher. The SES stop 25% slower in my experience (I own 6.7, 3.4, 404's and 808's).


I've have/had both the 404s and 3.4s and agree that the Zipps have better stopping power.


Last edited by kdogg32 on Wed May 07, 2014 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 92
Grill wrote:
FIJIGabe wrote:
GregSherwin wrote:
Ok thanks for all the replies

So to surmise irrespective of cost peoples view is that zipps have a better braking surface?

Weight is much the same as the 2014 attacks are 1365g


not exactly the comparison, but my 303's vs my old DV3K's (same braking surface - Ctg), I can confirm that the Zipps stop better.


DV3K models are all pre-CTg. My Attacks and RZR's brake better than Zipps. Also, if you're not going for 2014 model Zipps then you get poorly designed hubs that will grenade on you.


Completely disagree and I've ridden Reynolds 32s and 46s with the CTG. I like Reynolds wheels, but I find they still brake worse than Zipps. I haven't had a problem with either hubs.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 1082
Location: The Lone Star State
I Recently did some hilly rides on my 303's over the last three months. Most of the rides had long, straight decents leading to climbs, so braking wasn't much of an issue. Last weekend, however, I did a couple of rides in and around Austin, TX. Although the hills aren't particularly high, they are steep and winding, requiring a lot of braking to control your decent, as there are oncoming cars. I can say that the Firecrest/Zipp Platinum pad combination provides much better control and grip (in dry conditions) than the Reynolds CtG/Cryo-Blue (previous gen) combination. With the Reynolds, control was an issue. You would hit the brake, and hit them hard, whereas the Zipps provide better responsiveness and braking ability.

_________________
I own a lot of Treks


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:03 am
Posts: 620
Location: nyc
Back to the original post:

When we weighed 202 vs 404 FC clinhcers, the difference was less than 200g, I lbeleive less than 150 g, seems like if you are gonna go for 202 might as well do 404 and get far better aerodynamics as far as I can see. I love my 404. Compared to Edge 45 tubs w Alchemy they are damn good though not as fast accelerating and easy to hold at speed nor as agile, but really solid and confidence-inspiring. Mine are 2012 w the v8 hub I guess...waiting for it to explodee any day now.. :roll:

_________________
My wallet is the lightest thing on my bike.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 3:18 pm
Posts: 230
@Dammit no one could get a decent deal at my shop through the NA supplier either :(

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 202 Firecrest clincher flex

in Road

thencameyou

8

1172

Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:10 am

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scratch in 2016 Zipp 202 Firecrest Carbon Clincher

in Road

Morta

5

640

Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:01 pm

em3 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 303 vs Zipp 404 chainstay rub

in Road

nemeseri

14

1418

Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:49 am

nemeseri View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What tubeless 25 mm tyres for Reynolds Assault

in Road

kingkongsfinger

12

885

Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:25 pm

kingkongsfinger View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Reynolds 2015 ctg braking performance?

in Road

nemeseri

8

483

Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:30 am

nemeseri View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Exabot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], hlvd and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited