HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:04 pm
Posts: 22
Hi. What are people's view on which is the better all round wheel?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:03 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:22 am
Posts: 1240
Location: Zion
Are they in the same price range?

Are we talking new for both?

_________________
My sub-5.6kg / 12.32lb Addict R1

My ~9.3kg / ~20.5lb Scale 29 Pro


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:08 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Posts: 6724
Location: Drenthe, Holland
please elaborate,

What kind of terrain are you riding in, what is your weight/ riding style. Right now the question could also be: oranges or apples, which one tastes better?

_________________
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'

Follow me on twitter. I try to be interesting ;)
On Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:16 pm
Posts: 425
A quick search turns up the Reynolds Attack for £933, whereas the cheapest I can find the Zipps is £1,787.

So- the Attacks are half the price, are the Zipps twice the wheel?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:16 pm
Posts: 425
(Interested in this btw as I'm looking at 202 tubular vs 3.4 SES).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 1:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:42 am
Posts: 31
If price is no issue then the firecrests are a no brainer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1402
Firecests. If you're going to spend a lot of money than at least buy something that provides some extra performance(however small it might be) than a cheap custom build.

Dammit wrote:
A quick search turns up the Reynolds Attack for £933, whereas the cheapest I can find the Zipps is £1,787.

So- the Attacks are half the price, are the Zipps twice the wheel?


That analogy doesn't really work when talking about top end technologies. You could build a set of wheels with xr3o rims, cx-ray spokes, and cheapo hubs for about $350, and get performance on par with Attacks. I can't think of cheap build that would get you on par with Zipp Firecrests.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 5:50 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 337
Dammit wrote:
(Interested in this btw as I'm looking at 202 tubular vs 3.4 SES).


The only thing I can say is the FireCrest have a better braking surface and stop as well as an alloy clincher. The SES stop 25% slower in my experience (I own 6.7, 3.4, 404's and 808's).

_________________
carbonLORD.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:04 am
Posts: 437
Location: USA
As a point of reference; Zipp does not seem to offer a 202 Firecrest Tubular. I wish they did because I want a set.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:29 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 337
Personally I do not see the attraction with tubulars for road in 2014. My ENVE's and Zipp's have a max PSI of 115, the heat issue is no more and I can swap a tube a lot faster then re-gluing but I could understand the need for CX with pinch flats and low tire pressure being the only reason.

_________________
carbonLORD.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:53 am
Posts: 274
Low weight and way better tires are still great reasons to use with tubulars. Clinchers are for training wheels.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 342
What's the weight difference when you're comparing:

3 tubes + 2 clinchers vs. 3 tubular?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 574
oh boy... please don't let this descend into another tubular vs. clincher fight, we just had one of those...

_________________
2013 Madone 5
2012 SpeedConcept 7
2013 Superfly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:41 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 337
tinozee wrote:
Low weight and way better tires are still great reasons to use with tubulars. Clinchers are for training wheels.


The difference between Zipp 404 FireCrest CC and Tubular

With Vittoria Corsa VS Open Corsa with Continental Racelight 28 tubes is

75g per wheel.

75 grams per wheel! This does not take into account the weight of the glue which is around 30g per set.

So we're talking 60g per wheel.

Not compelling enough for me but if you like them better, thats all that really matters.

_________________
carbonLORD.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:41 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:53 am
Posts: 274
I hear ya man. Just had to add my little jab. ;P

I do use vittoria open tubs on my clinchers, they are nice and supple but slick in the rain. I can't live without veloflex and FMB tubs on my zipps. The glue removal work also burns 2kg. of fat on average and the glue cleaning melts about 100 grams of brain cells.

I think eventually the ideal will be deep carbon tubeless. I guess Easton makes some already.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bontie, BRM, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 202 Firecrest

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

Sparks

24

4904

Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:46 pm

Elrey View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 404 Firecrest Wheels

in Road

kdogg32

0

533

Fri May 16, 2014 7:47 pm

kdogg32 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Parlee Z3 and Zipp 303 Firecrest?

in Road

boots2000

4

953

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:58 pm

ryan0380 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Reynolds 32 2013 Vs Attack 2014, which one?

in Road

eckhous

6

757

Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:17 am

eckhous View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Roval Rapide CLX 40 vs Zipp Firecrest 303 Clincher

in Road

LoggingMiles

11

5924

Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:17 am

carbonLORD View the latest post


It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:49 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB