Reynolds attack or zipp 202 firecrest
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:04 pm
Hi. What are people's view on which is the better all round wheel?
-
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:22 am
- Location: Zion
Are they in the same price range?
Are we talking new for both?
Are we talking new for both?
- Frankie - B
- Administrator
- Posts: 6591
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
- Location: Drenthe, Holland
please elaborate,
What kind of terrain are you riding in, what is your weight/ riding style. Right now the question could also be: oranges or apples, which one tastes better?
What kind of terrain are you riding in, what is your weight/ riding style. Right now the question could also be: oranges or apples, which one tastes better?
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'
Firecests. If you're going to spend a lot of money than at least buy something that provides some extra performance(however small it might be) than a cheap custom build.
That analogy doesn't really work when talking about top end technologies. You could build a set of wheels with xr3o rims, cx-ray spokes, and cheapo hubs for about $350, and get performance on par with Attacks. I can't think of cheap build that would get you on par with Zipp Firecrests.
Dammit wrote:A quick search turns up the Reynolds Attack for £933, whereas the cheapest I can find the Zipps is £1,787.
So- the Attacks are half the price, are the Zipps twice the wheel?
That analogy doesn't really work when talking about top end technologies. You could build a set of wheels with xr3o rims, cx-ray spokes, and cheapo hubs for about $350, and get performance on par with Attacks. I can't think of cheap build that would get you on par with Zipp Firecrests.
- carbonLORD
- in the industry
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
- Contact:
Dammit wrote:(Interested in this btw as I'm looking at 202 tubular vs 3.4 SES).
The only thing I can say is the FireCrest have a better braking surface and stop as well as an alloy clincher. The SES stop 25% slower in my experience (I own 6.7, 3.4, 404's and 808's).
carbonLORD.com
As a point of reference; Zipp does not seem to offer a 202 Firecrest Tubular. I wish they did because I want a set.
- carbonLORD
- in the industry
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
- Contact:
Personally I do not see the attraction with tubulars for road in 2014. My ENVE's and Zipp's have a max PSI of 115, the heat issue is no more and I can swap a tube a lot faster then re-gluing but I could understand the need for CX with pinch flats and low tire pressure being the only reason.
carbonLORD.com
oh boy... please don't let this descend into another tubular vs. clincher fight, we just had one of those...
Madone 9 https://goo.gl/7UwZpV
Crockett https://goo.gl/f5PdCN
Madone 5 https://goo.gl/cMdyFo
Madone 4, Cobia. I own a lot of Treks.
Crockett https://goo.gl/f5PdCN
Madone 5 https://goo.gl/cMdyFo
Madone 4, Cobia. I own a lot of Treks.
- carbonLORD
- in the industry
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
- Contact:
tinozee wrote:Low weight and way better tires are still great reasons to use with tubulars. Clinchers are for training wheels.
The difference between Zipp 404 FireCrest CC and Tubular
With Vittoria Corsa VS Open Corsa with Continental Racelight 28 tubes is
75g per wheel.
75 grams per wheel! This does not take into account the weight of the glue which is around 30g per set.
So we're talking 60g per wheel.
Not compelling enough for me but if you like them better, thats all that really matters.
carbonLORD.com
I hear ya man. Just had to add my little jab. ;P
I do use vittoria open tubs on my clinchers, they are nice and supple but slick in the rain. I can't live without veloflex and FMB tubs on my zipps. The glue removal work also burns 2kg. of fat on average and the glue cleaning melts about 100 grams of brain cells.
I think eventually the ideal will be deep carbon tubeless. I guess Easton makes some already.
I do use vittoria open tubs on my clinchers, they are nice and supple but slick in the rain. I can't live without veloflex and FMB tubs on my zipps. The glue removal work also burns 2kg. of fat on average and the glue cleaning melts about 100 grams of brain cells.
I think eventually the ideal will be deep carbon tubeless. I guess Easton makes some already.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 438 Views
-
Last post by Shrike
Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:08 am
-
- 0 Replies
- 407 Views
-
Last post by TSJ
Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:55 pm
-
- 5 Replies
- 399 Views
-
Last post by dcorn
Tue Mar 06, 2018 12:38 pm
-
- 2 Replies
- 469 Views
-
Last post by dorin
Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:19 pm
-
- 1 Replies
- 589 Views
-
Last post by joepac
Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:40 pm