Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Mon Jun 26, 2017 1:39 pm

Unanswered topics | Active topics


» »

All times are UTC+01:00

Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
GregSherwin
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:04 pm
Posts: 22
Hi. What are people's view on which is the better all round wheel?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Johnny Rad
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:22 am
Posts: 1695
Location: Zion
Are they in the same price range?

Are we talking new for both?

_________________
Sub-5.8kg / 12.7lbs Addict SL w/PowerTap
9.3kg / 20.5lbs Scale 29 Pro ... woefully under-used
Retired: 5.9kg / 13lbs Addict R1 w/PowerTap ... lowest was 5.593kg / 12.33lbs
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Weenie
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:08 pm 


Top
   
 
Frankie - B
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:08 pm 
Online
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Posts: 6481
Location: Drenthe, Holland
please elaborate,

What kind of terrain are you riding in, what is your weight/ riding style. Right now the question could also be: oranges or apples, which one tastes better?

_________________
Quote:
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Dammit
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:16 pm
Posts: 443
A quick search turns up the Reynolds Attack for £933, whereas the cheapest I can find the Zipps is £1,787.

So- the Attacks are half the price, are the Zipps twice the wheel?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Dammit
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:16 pm
Posts: 443
(Interested in this btw as I'm looking at 202 tubular vs 3.4 SES).
Top
   
Reply with quote  
jason9020
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 1:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:42 am
Posts: 31
If price is no issue then the firecrests are a no brainer.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
bricky21
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1405
Firecests. If you're going to spend a lot of money than at least buy something that provides some extra performance(however small it might be) than a cheap custom build.

Dammit wrote:
A quick search turns up the Reynolds Attack for £933, whereas the cheapest I can find the Zipps is £1,787.

So- the Attacks are half the price, are the Zipps twice the wheel?


That analogy doesn't really work when talking about top end technologies. You could build a set of wheels with xr3o rims, cx-ray spokes, and cheapo hubs for about $350, and get performance on par with Attacks. I can't think of cheap build that would get you on par with Zipp Firecrests.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
carbonLORD
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 5:50 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 385
Dammit wrote:
(Interested in this btw as I'm looking at 202 tubular vs 3.4 SES).


The only thing I can say is the FireCrest have a better braking surface and stop as well as an alloy clincher. The SES stop 25% slower in my experience (I own 6.7, 3.4, 404's and 808's).

_________________
carbonLORD.com
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Bridgeman
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:04 am
Posts: 574
Location: USA
As a point of reference; Zipp does not seem to offer a 202 Firecrest Tubular. I wish they did because I want a set.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
carbonLORD
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:29 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 385
Personally I do not see the attraction with tubulars for road in 2014. My ENVE's and Zipp's have a max PSI of 115, the heat issue is no more and I can swap a tube a lot faster then re-gluing but I could understand the need for CX with pinch flats and low tire pressure being the only reason.

_________________
carbonLORD.com
Top
   
Reply with quote  
tinozee
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:53 am
Posts: 689
Low weight and way better tires are still great reasons to use with tubulars. Clinchers are for training wheels.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
rijndael
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 395
Location: Haines, AK - Temporarily
What's the weight difference when you're comparing:

3 tubes + 2 clinchers vs. 3 tubular?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
FIJIGabe
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 1188
Location: The Lone Star State
oh boy... please don't let this descend into another tubular vs. clincher fight, we just had one of those...

_________________
Madone 9 http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=143973

Crockett http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=130567

Madone 5, Madone 4, SpeedConcept, Cobia

I own a lot of Treks.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
carbonLORD
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:41 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 385
tinozee wrote:
Low weight and way better tires are still great reasons to use with tubulars. Clinchers are for training wheels.


The difference between Zipp 404 FireCrest CC and Tubular

With Vittoria Corsa VS Open Corsa with Continental Racelight 28 tubes is

75g per wheel.

75 grams per wheel! This does not take into account the weight of the glue which is around 30g per set.

So we're talking 60g per wheel.

Not compelling enough for me but if you like them better, thats all that really matters.

_________________
carbonLORD.com
Top
   
Reply with quote  
tinozee
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:53 am
Posts: 689
I hear ya man. Just had to add my little jab. ;P

I do use vittoria open tubs on my clinchers, they are nice and supple but slick in the rain. I can't live without veloflex and FMB tubs on my zipps. The glue removal work also burns 2kg. of fat on average and the glue cleaning melts about 100 grams of brain cells.

I think eventually the ideal will be deep carbon tubeless. I guess Easton makes some already.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Weenie
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:07 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Real world use of ZIpp 404 firecrest - I am struggling. Advice req.

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

diegogarcia

57

3936

Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:51 am

yongdaeok View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scratch in 2016 Zipp 202 Firecrest Carbon Clincher

in Road

Morta

5

939

Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:01 pm

em3 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. QR skewer shopping - Zipp v Enve v Reynolds

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

Shrike

34

2083

Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:00 am

Johnny Rad View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 303 vs Zipp 404 chainstay rub

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

nemeseri

17

2522

Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:01 am

are View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Can you identify this Reynolds hub?

in Road

MarkH

10

615

Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:53 pm

CLEAR View the latest post


» »

All times are UTC+01:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aspms, Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], lovemyway, Mockenrue, prebsy, wingguy, Yahoo [Bot] and 37 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited