Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:12 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: New York City
so here is a video of someone standing on the chain/seat stays. usually some frames you can flex them with your hands. but check out the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdC6z1dkKnU

the frame barely moved, is this too much? or do you just use wider rim with bigger tires to balance it all out?

what are the thoughts on this, i like to read what the community has to say.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1405
Yep, there has to be a point where frame stiffness is too much. At the moment we only have theories to go by.

It used to be that in golf everyone(most anyways) used the stiffest shafts they could buy. Why? because all the pros used stiff shafts. It wasn't until launch monitors came out that people could be shown with science what shaft yielded the best results for the individual. That is a bit simplified, but the point being once we can be shown with science the flexing and unflexing(is that a word?) of a frame under an individual we will be able to choose appropriately stiff equipment.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 2191
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
That video is not a good way to measure frame stiffness, although it's cool that it doesnt break.

Back in the old round metal tubing days you could have a stiff frame which beat you up, or a good riding frame which was flexy. All they could tune was tubing wall thickness (and frame geometry to some extent) so there was a direct tradeoff between stiffness and ride. The Vitus 979 glued aluminium race bike was famed for riding well and for being really flexy.

These days with CF, not only can they make tube shapes that are not round, they can adjust the layup thickness and fiber orientation everywhere on the frame. This allows a wider range of ride quality for a given stiffness, and allows adjusting stiffness in some directions more than others. We're closer to the famed "laterally stiff yet vertically compliant" trope that is used by magazine reviewers.

However stiffness and ride quality are not completely decoupled. A really stiff frame is still going to ride harsher, as a general rule, than a not so stiff frame.

Many people put too much credence to "power transfer". The power absorbed by frame flex is very small since the frame is essentially a spring. Flex in one direction is returned in the other. (before you say that CF isn't a spring, the rear spring on Corvettes is made from CF, and so are the springy bits on compound bows).
One of the ways that I know I am reading material from marketing dweebs instead of bike engineers is when they say "power transfer".

I think that you can have too much stiffness for some applications. If I was a 190 lbs crit monster I would probably disagree, but I'm a 146 lbs skinny climber who does long rides and races. Since I'm also 6' tall, many frames my size are made for heavier riders and thus are stiffer than I need. If I ever get a custom frame built I'll get it made with thinner or smaller diameter tubing so it's appropriately (not) stiff for my weight and riding style.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: New York City
eric wrote:
Many people put too much credence to "power transfer". The power absorbed by frame flex is very small since the frame is essentially a spring. Flex in one direction is returned in the other. (before you say that CF isn't a spring, the rear spring on Corvettes is made from CF, and so are the springy bits on compound bows).
One of the ways that I know I am reading material from marketing dweebs instead of bike engineers is when they say "power transfer".


The look keo blade pedals use carbon as a spring...
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:23 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Austin, TX
Laterally stiff, vertically compliant...Someone had to say it :mrgreen:

_________________
My Cervelo R5
My Lynskey Helix
My MTB


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5334
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
That's the opposite of what women want.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 1037
Location: Sweden
Also, if you are a 2.000watt crit monster, actually getting the power to the ground may prove a challenge as the rear wheel skips everywhere. Not an issue on the track, but very well a possible issue on anything less than perfect tarmac... Flex can aid traction.

And before some jackass (as always) says it, lowering the tire pressure may solve the issue, but not without creating issues elsewhere.

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:41 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 9:33 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Luxembourg / Sweden
eric wrote:

Many people put too much credence to "power transfer". The power absorbed by frame flex is very small since the frame is essentially a spring. Flex in one direction is returned in the other. (before you say that CF isn't a spring, the rear spring on Corvettes is made from CF, and so are the springy bits on compound bows).
One of the ways that I know I am reading material from marketing dweebs instead of bike engineers is when they say "power transfer"..


Carbon is a very efficient spring, yes. But it takes work to compress/distort that spring and the return force is not magically transmitted back into the chain.. and translated into forward propulsion, it simply springs back. Can we please let this old myth die.

/a

_________________
rolobikes


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:36 am
Posts: 20
HammerTime2 wrote:
That's the opposite of what women want.

Props to the funniest reply I have read this year.
I literally just LOL'ed.

I believe too stiff would be bad.
If the frame and wheels didn't flex some when leaned over in a turn a bump in the road would throw the bike off course or even eject the rider.
A skinny road tire can only absorb so much impact so I think frames have to account for this.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:50 pm
Posts: 119
Location: UK
I own said frame.

Have a read about it under the Gallery section :D


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Quantifiable Cannondale Synapse BB Stiffness

in Road

TheKaiser

5

500

Fri Apr 01, 2016 7:03 am

stormur View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. SWorks Allez lateral stiffness problem?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

greentimgreen

32

3532

Sat Aug 22, 2015 12:45 pm

GorrGrimWolf View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Selecting between an Aero Road bike vs a Time Trial bike?

in Road

THUNDERHORSE

6

868

Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:04 am

pdlpsher1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Upgraded to a new bike, and now I want to upgrade my old bike. What to do?

in Road

joshuagull

13

507

Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:13 am

joshuagull View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Graphene bike?

in Road

losdoyers

6

983

Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:08 pm

Nefarious86 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Babek, Bing [Bot], wingguy, Yahoo [Bot] and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited