Wert Straight Shooter stem

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Post Reply
User avatar
mythical
Posts: 1515
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Location: Europe
Contact:

by mythical

Every now and then I've noticed threads popping up on either light or stiff stems, but when is a stem both stiff and light enough?

Behold this 130mm prototype stem I'm testing that makes the carbon steerer of my Alpha-Q GS30 seem rather elastic.

Image
Last edited by mythical on Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:18 pm, edited 4 times in total.
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

User avatar
michel2
Posts: 1144
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:47 am
Location: somewere floating between here and the other side

by michel2

Jeez louieez !
130mm is a propper lenght aswell, tell us more, how made the stem, is it your handy work ?(;

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
MajorMantra
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:38 pm

by MajorMantra

Wow. Is that fully CNC'd? I'd be slightly concerned about the strength of a CNC'd part at that weight.

User avatar
Zen Cyclery
Shop Owner
Posts: 1244
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:27 am
Location: McCall, ID
Contact:

by Zen Cyclery

Ahh a beautiful stem but 130mm? Might as well use a baseball bat for a stem at that point.

User avatar
prendrefeu
Posts: 8580
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Glendale / Los Angeles, California
Contact:

by prendrefeu

So how much does the 90mm weigh?
And cost?

:twisted:
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.

User avatar
mythical
Posts: 1515
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Location: Europe
Contact:

by mythical

Here are projected weights for each length.

80 mm =67 grams
90 mm = 71 grams
100 mm = 74 grams
110 mm = 77 grams
120 mm = 80 grams
130 mm = 85 grams

The prototype bolts are hollow so they're lighter than production bolts, which will not be hollow. Prices will be announced when production is underway, once testing is rounded off successfully. This is the 3rd generation prototype already. The angle is 7.5º with a 37.5mm stack height.

The first one can be seen in this Velonews article and the second one (a 150mm) can be seen here: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=516676328379025 This one almost passed EN14781 but it wasn't good enough for production. Meanwhile, I fell ill and required immediate medical treatment, though now I'm fully recovered and want to give the world awesome bike parts.
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

User avatar
Stolichnaya
Posts: 2621
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:55 pm
Location: Vienna, AUT

by Stolichnaya

I fail to see why 130 is anywhere close to being a baseball bat. Pretty standard length for a lot of us out there...

Now, how can we get some real stiffness stats on this proto? Looks quite nice.

User avatar
53x12
Posts: 3708
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Location: On the bike

by 53x12

Nicely done. Look forward to hearing more about it!


Zen Cyclery wrote:Ahh a beautiful stem but 130mm? Might as well use a baseball bat for a stem at that point.


What is that suppose to mean?



MajorMantra wrote:Wow. Is that fully CNC'd? I'd be slightly concerned about the strength of a CNC'd part at that weight.


Why are you concerned about a CNC'd part? No need for concern if it is done correctly by a competent person as mythical seems to be in this regard. I would have no concern.
"Marginal gains are the only gains when all that's left to gain is in the margins."

User avatar
MajorMantra
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:38 pm

by MajorMantra

Just because CNC'd parts are inherently weaker than forged ones, and this is a part that's pushing the limits on weight savings.

User avatar
mythical
Posts: 1515
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Location: Europe
Contact:

by mythical

Allow me to address a few common misconceptions. First of all, whether forged or CNC-machined, the point at which a part fails (and all parts will fail!) is not determined by how it's manufactured, but rather by how well it's engineered. My aim was to build a stronger and stiffer stem in absolute terms. Why? I wasn't satisfied with the selection of stems I tried, e.g. a Ritchey 4-Axis WCS and Thomson X4, all 130mm, and hoped I could do better.

With FEA (Finite Element Analysis) only being a predictive tool, we calculated how my 3D-stem models behaved when applying the stringent EN14781 and EN14766 test protocols (respectively for road and mountainbikes). The published FEA-report concluded that stresses remained well below the fatigue limit of AL7075-T6 aluminum, the material used for this stem. Currently, these claims are undergoing validation through real world testing by our development partner, a trusted handlebar manufacturer in Germany. The project sustained minor delays caused by illness and faulty manufacturing, so final results are still pending.

Should this stem pass the demanding EN-tests, a basic requirement for stems raced in UCI events, an even greater challenge arises: Convincing potential buyers that our stem is sufficiently strong, stiff and durable, and safe enough for its given application despite its low weight.

As for stiffness values, they mean little by themselves. Such numbers only speak through comparative data generated by pitting this stem against competitors. Blessings to those with patience and understanding! :thumbup:
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

User avatar
53x12
Posts: 3708
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Location: On the bike

by 53x12

MajorMantra wrote:Just because CNC'd parts are inherently weaker than forged ones, and this is a part that's pushing the limits on weight savings.


That is a misconception many hold. A properly designed and executed CNC part is just as strong. No need to paint broad strokes.
"Marginal gains are the only gains when all that's left to gain is in the margins."

shimmeD
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:52 pm
Location: eNZed

by shimmeD

This product has a ww niche. 37.5mm stack is nice. Please also do 17deg for those who go low.
Less is more.


nigel379
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:23 am

by nigel379

Definitely looks like a nice stem. Add me to the waiting list as long as the price is competitive. Keep us updated on those cranks too, Mythical. What's next beyond the stem and cranks? Brakes (I hope)?

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



justkeepedaling
Posts: 1707
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am

by justkeepedaling

53x12 wrote:
MajorMantra wrote:Just because CNC'd parts are inherently weaker than forged ones, and this is a part that's pushing the limits on weight savings.


That is a misconception many hold. A properly designed and executed CNC part is just as strong. No need to paint broad strokes.


It's a misconception? Forging process refines the grain structure of the material itself. Of course, engineering can get around that for the most part, but a forged part will likely be stronger than a machined one, using the same material

Post Reply