johnsaysthisnow wrote:Would like to see PF30 instead of BB30.
As a mechanic who has to deal with the problematic PF30 system, I'm curious, why do you as a consumer want to see PF30 in an aluminum frame?
Moderator: robbosmans
Doolop wrote:johnsaysthisnow wrote:Would like to see PF30 instead of BB30.
As a mechanic who has to deal with the problematic PF30 system, I'm curious, why do you as a consumer want to see PF30 in an aluminum frame?
Doolop wrote:johnsaysthisnow wrote:Would like to see PF30 instead of BB30.
As a mechanic who has to deal with the problematic PF30 system, I'm curious, why do you as a consumer want to see PF30 in an aluminum frame?
Ahillock wrote:HUMP DIESEL wrote:you can sit the two frames together and see what they have learned from the EVO shaping has translated to the CAAD10.
I thought CAAD10 was designed first and they used that template for the Evo the year after.