Sub-200g carbon bar - ZIPP SL still the best choice?
Moderator: robbosmans
@LionelB: 177g for a 46 bar? Yes, that is a bit "scary". How do you find them?
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Calnago wrote:@LionelB: 177g for a 46 bar? Yes, that is a bit "scary". How do you find them?
I think they are claiming 185g for 42, so I was surprised by the 177g for 46... I have 2 rides on them and they are pretty good. I can feel some flex in the drops but not much.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
RedRacer wrote:LionelB wrote:My deda 46 SuperLeggera came in at a scary 177g.
Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't seen this model before today so I assume it is new for Deda?
Are the bar tops round or an odd oval shape?
It is new es. They are what Deda calls RHM, have a look at their website for a good side view of it. This is similar to the Deda zero shape.
I would go with the Zipp. 
I think they were right around <180g. I've had 4 different bars (Forte, Zipp SLC S&S, Zipp SL, and 3T Ergonova) on my bike in the last couple years. The SL were the lightest, but I went back to a ergo bar and like my ergonova for the shape. Weight on the white Ergonova is a porky 215g though.
I think they were right around <180g. I've had 4 different bars (Forte, Zipp SLC S&S, Zipp SL, and 3T Ergonova) on my bike in the last couple years. The SL were the lightest, but I went back to a ergo bar and like my ergonova for the shape. Weight on the white Ergonova is a porky 215g though.
