2014 Campagnolo groups?

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
User avatar
mythical
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Location: Europe
Contact:

by mythical

Given that these are cranks, thus right up my ally, I thought I'd do some research. Glory Cycles posted some photos on their Flickr account of the tools for the Over-Torque™ cranks.

Image

I also found a patent for the Over-Torque™ crankset, which has a publication date of July 17, 2013: EP2615021 A1 where Figure 3 explains the clamping construction a bit.

Image
“I always find it amazing that a material can actually sell a product when it’s really the engineering that creates and dictates how well that material will behave or perform.” — Chuck Teixeira

RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook

by Weenie


uraqt
Posts: 810
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:53 am

by uraqt

Thank you vey much Mythical!!!

Set screws? Is this 1907?

C

Pharmstrong
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:17 pm

by Pharmstrong

More tools, great. I'm struggling to see what benefit this design offers over a pinch bolt?

User avatar
kbbpll
Posts: 402
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:56 am

by kbbpll

uraqt wrote:Is this 1907?
C

Next up: A square tapered axle!

OK, so that second tool looks like a spanner/extractor combo, but I can't figure out what that first thing does. [Edit - it looks like it pushes the crankarm on? Ultra Torque seems so much more elegant]

11-27 cassette looks intriguing. I'm mulling over how much time I spend in 39-16 or 53-16 (16 replaced with 11 in this cassette), versus times I wish I had 53-11. I'm on 12-27 currently, do a fair bit of climbing, some descents would be faster on 11, but I haven't had the guts to go 11-25.

natiedean24
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:16 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

by natiedean24

WTF is '8D' in the diagram above? a setscrew - honestly.

User avatar
Wingnut
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am

by Wingnut

"It's not the destination...it's the ride!"

jaibautista
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:17 pm

by jaibautista

Just a thought: why was the UT design not used to create the oversized spindles? Why the shift towards a PT-inspired crankset?

Was it because of weight concerns? Durability concerns? Cost concerns?

I couldn't understand why Campagnolo had to move away from a tried-and-tested crankset design. :noidea:

Causidicus
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:20 am

by Causidicus

.
Last edited by Causidicus on Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wingnut
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am

by Wingnut

Agree...pretty disappointing so far...
"It's not the destination...it's the ride!"

User avatar
Martin.F
Posts: 759
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:21 pm
Location: Norway, Drammen

by Martin.F

Does anybody know if the Bora 35 comes in darklabel? The red don't match my Celeste!


User avatar
ferrarista
Posts: 1666
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Canada

by ferrarista

Martin.F wrote:Does anybody know if the Bora 35 comes in darklabel? The red don't match my Celeste!


For sure it will be available. All their top end wheels have that option.
██

solarider
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:08 pm

by solarider

I run SR EPS. The internal battery appeals but I am not about to drill another hole in my frame for a charging port that might become obsolete and isn't common with DI2.

It also appears that fixing the battery internally is going to require quite a bit of dexterity, and the removal of the bb which isn't practical every charge.

I hoped to be able to fit it into the seat post through an interference fit. Is this going to be an option? Not too much of a hindrance to remove the seat post to charge, and I might even consider drilling a hole for the charging port in a seat post, but not a frame.

morrisond
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 8:34 pm

by morrisond

If your frame is built for EPS already - there should already be a hole where the wires used to exit the frame to go to the battery.

It's probably either around the top of the BB or by the lower bottle cage.

Mount your battery to whichever bottle cage the hole is located to next too and put the charging port in that. No need to ever remove the battery then.

solarider
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:08 pm

by solarider

On many frames that I have seen, that makes sense. Unfortunately my battery is mounted underneath the downtube near the bb.

The wires enter the frame underneath the bb shell, which is too far away from either bottle mount to run what seems to be a really short cable from the battery on the pictures. It also seems to need quiet a bit of clearance inside the frame, which I don't have around the bb.

by Weenie


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post