Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:14 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:33 pm
Posts: 1529
From Cyclingnews.com

    Italian component maker 3T met some last-minute resistance to its Brezza time trial aerobars during the recent Tour of California, when the sport's governing body, the International Cycling Union (UCI), introduced an aero 'form factor' rule, nearly thwarting the 3T-sponsored Felt and Cervélo bikes ridden by Christian Vande Velde, David Zabriskie, Carlos Sastre and Thor Hushovd.

    As a result, 3T has tweaked its Ventus and Brezza model designs, while adding two affordable options, the Mistral and Zefiro.

    "In February, we were about to freeze the design of these new bars and commit to production," said 3T chief executive René Wiertz. "Then the row over aerodynamics blew up at the Tour of California. Our new bars were engineered to the same aerodynamic principles as the Brezza, which was already fitted to the Cervélo and Garmin-Slipstream TT bikes.

    "Brezza clearly doesn't comply with UCI rule 1.3.024, but we were able to re-engineer the designs for the Mistral and Zefiro in time," he added. "We're pulling out all the stops to get them into production, so quite soon teams should be able to specify a made-for-purpose aerobar that's fully UCI-legal."

    The Mistral bars resemble the Brezzas, ridden by Zabriskie in California. 3T has positioned the bars a lower price point (US$300 for the Pro edition), largely built of carbon fibre composites. Mistral has multiple elbow-pad mountings in the top skin of the base bar. Together with a new 'deep-S' extension option, this entry-level base bar affords a wide range of adjustment. It also meets the UCI's recently clarified rules on aerodynamic 'form factor', so can legally be used in any UCI event, according to the company.

    "Time was very short to re-engineer these new bars," 3T technical director Richard McAinsh added. "But we are well equipped to do this. 3T has what is probably the industry's most advanced platform for rapid prototyping and stress-testing of cycle components.

    "This experience shows that we can quickly and effectively engineer 3T components to the exact requirements of any code or rider."

    For more information, visit www.thenew3t.com


Image

Image


Top
   
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:42 pm 


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:49 pm
Posts: 104
Location: Norway
Does anyone know if the Missile flat carbon TT aerobar straight by PRO will become illegal?


Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 48
Sorry to awaken an old thread, but I'm interested in building a UCI legal tt bike for next season. What are the fastest UCI legal aerobars now available (e.g., USE Tula)?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 7:13 am
Posts: 1536
From the very limited data I've seen, the USE Tula and the Old Easton attacks are pretty good UCI legal bars.

Probably the biggest thing to remember with aerobars is that because they only see wind from strait ahead, shape doesn't have much of an effect on performance, but frontal area is a big factor.

Keeping that in mind, bars with a narrow basebar grip(the Tula and Old Attack were both 38cm), thin wing section(15mm is good) and the extensions in line with the basebar seem to be the best choice.

I'm not sure about the new Brezza but the Aura and Mistral each have wing sections no thinner than 20mm at their thinnest point.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Location Location!
I don't see why that PRO bar wouldn't be UCI legal.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 48
I thought I had read somewhere that the Easton Attack (one-piece carbon) was not going to be UCI legal? It would be a great option if it works. The one piece has to be one of the lightest tt cockpits available (~360g). It appears that the new Attack model has removable extensions with a bit of a weight penalty for the added adjustability.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 1:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:53 am
Posts: 259
can someone please point me in the right direction?

I am looking for the ruling on the above old easton TT attack bars - I just dont want a stupid idiot UCI rule from ending in tears at nationals.....

http://animegaonootoko.cocolog-nifty.co ... c_0003.jpg


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:00 am
Posts: 457
Location: Bay Area, CA
I measure mine at about 3.1:1, so I wouldn't risk it. The newer adjustable ones (2010 onward) are UCI legal.


Top
   
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:04 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:53 am
Posts: 259
yeah that is what I thought!!!.... where do they measure exactly? I am even thinking of adding a layer of CF to make it thicker just to appease these morons.... I wish they would realise that a mm of bar thickness does nothing in the overall for low speed aero.... urrgghhhh

:(


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Do Aero Road Bars look ok on Non Aero frames

[ Go to page: 13 4 5 6 7 ]

in Road

dreden513

95

6309

Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:51 am

NGtim View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero Drop Bars

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

campbellrae

35

4924

Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:15 am

muntos View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Do you ride on the tops with your aero bars?

in Road

Shrike

14

851

Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:03 am

sawyer View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero bars and light mounts. The horror.

in Road

Shrike

8

863

Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:47 am

Shrike View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any one-piece aero bars with 140mm stem?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Shrike

18

532

Tue Sep 20, 2016 5:27 pm

Shrike View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beatle, csteeds, istigatrice, kramnnim, LionelB, MSNbot Media, shonanmike, sun and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited