HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 9:39 pm
Posts: 333
jason,

thx for the comprehensive crank review. i'm done buying cranks, but sheds some nice info for those in the market.

_________________
- Parlee Z5 SLi + DA9070 + Enve 3.4 Tune/Dash hubs
- Independent Fabrication Ti FLW + Campy SR11 + Enve 3.4 CK hubs


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:28 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:21 pm
Posts: 94
deltree wrote:
madcow wrote:
We're already putting together round 6 which will have Red22 as well as a new model of a crank that has been around for a while(sorry can't say more). Plus hopefully a few more boutique cranks.


I know you can't say but I'd love it to be a Cannondale SISL2 with spider-rings.



I second that.

Thanks for the very informative review.

_________________
My favorite components are the ones I never have to think about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:52 am
Posts: 250
Bet they will be testing the EE crank, to be produced by Pacenti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:28 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
Yes, per
On May 28, 2013 in Ciamillo Gravitas crank, review and poll, madcow wrote:
We have finished the latest round of testing and will be releasing it hopefully later this week. (Thm M3, Tune Smartfoot, DuraAce 9000 and a new Kcnc crank.) Hopefully we'll have the Gravitas to go into our next round which will have the Sram 22 as well as the new upcoming Campag and production EE.
which I quoted in an earlier post in this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:36 am
Posts: 1184
Location: UK
ergott wrote:
I'd still love to see the current Super Record in the next round please.

Yes with the Ti spindle please!

Excellent work (as usual) madcow .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 2:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Posts: 1882
Location: Islip, NY
Do all the current Super Record cranks come with a titanium spindle? I'm not even sure if that's what I have. My group is 2013.

_________________
www.ergottwheels.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 2:19 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
Ti axle is still an option for SR crank.

SUPER RECORD™
ULTRA-TORQUE™
TITANIUM
11S CRANKSET
170, 172.5, 175, 177.5,
180 mm,
39-52, 39-53
170, 172.5, 175 mm,
42-54, 42-55
full-carbon unidirectional-multidirectional cranks - hollow cranks
(Ultra-Hollow™ Structure) - light alloy fixing bolts - light alloy
chainrings with XPSS™ (eXtreme Performance Shifting System) -
chainrings with hard anodization treatment - 8 pins on the large
chainring - CULT™ bearings (Ceramic Ultimate Level Techno-
logy) - integrated ULTRA-TORQUE™ semi-axles in titanium -
requires Super Record ULTRA-TORQUE™ BB cups
584

SUPER RECORD™
ULTRA-TORQUE™
CARBON 11S CRANKSET
170, 172.5, 175, 177.5,
180 mm,
39-52, 39-53
full-carbon unidirectional-multidirectional cranks - hollow cranks
(Ultra-Hollow™ Structure) - light alloy fixing bolts - light alloy
chainrings with XPSS™ (eXtreme Performance Shifting System) -
chainrings with hard anodization treatment - 8 pins on the large
chainring - CULT™ bearings (Ceramic Ultimate Level Techno-
logy) - integrated ULTRA-TORQUE™ semi-axles - requires Super
Record ULTRA-TORQUE™ BB cups
625
See also http://www.campagnolo.com/repository/documenti/en/Campagnolo_2013_Road_Catalogue_EN_d.pdf and http://www.campagnolo.com/jsp/en/groupsetdetail/item_guarSRST_catid_12.jsp, which mention titanium axle as an option for 2013 SR crank.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:29 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1969
Location: NoVA/DC
Specialized have a new version of their SWorks cranks, with broader arms. It would be nice to see those tested. Other tests have them neck-and-neck with the sisl...

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:31 pm
Posts: 997
Many years ago I played around with exotic cranks when a youthful MTB'er. I came to the conclusion that really the big manufacturer (Shimano at that time) really was as good as it got and have stuck with that idea ever since.

It's good to see the top three manufacturers leading the pack - the shift quality, reliability and cost of complete groupsets makes them hard to beat IMHO. Boutique cranksets seem to represent something of a compromise most of the time - hardly surprising given the limited R&D budget that is applied to them in the first place. It's good to see tests like this that demonstrate that more clearly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6249
Location: Urbana, Illinois
Saddened to see the Lightning crank go to a wider Q-Angle. Jason, would you know why they decided to go that direction? It was a strong consideration for my next crank but not anymore.

_________________
-For my next trick I will set myself on fire!
-This board and the world in general would be a much nicer place if everyone could just take themselves a little less seriously.
-Sticky Fingers John Rockefeller
-First one over the cliff wins!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:31 am
Posts: 142
Maybe I missed something, but why didn't the SRAM Exogram crank get tested ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Posts: 1882
Location: Islip, NY
Bonehead me could have taken 2 seconds to look at my crank to see if it had the titanium axle.
:oops:
Image

_________________
www.ergottwheels.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:16 pm
Posts: 73
"Saddened to see the Lightning crank go to a wider Q-Angle. Jason, would you know why they decided to go that direction? It was a strong consideration for my next crank but not anymore."

I recently purchased a set of the Lightnings and was surprised to see the wider Q-Factor. At my request, Lightning returned the spec of my cranks to the narrower stance width by boring out the extra carbon next to the pedal inserts. According to Lightning, they added the extra carbon to reinforce the pedal inserts as they sometimes loosened. As I am light, I told them that I was willing to live with that risk in exchange for the narrower Q-Factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: U factor measurement?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:24 pm
Posts: 91
Thanks for the great crank review. In addition to the Q-factor (width at the pedal flats), many riders with ankle clearance issues are interested in the U-factor (width at the spindle) - did you get a chance to measure this with your cranks? Or if not yet, do you still have the cranks so this can be measured?

As we know, some riders are a bit narrow hipped or bowlegged, and there are some that are a bit duck-footed (and even a few that are both,like me), who are most comfortable with the feet/pedals as narrow as possible. Often, the limitation on width between the feet isn't the crank Q-factor, but is instead the U-Factor. Some cranks in the test have narrow Q-factors, but if they don't also have narrow U-factors, some riders will have to move their shoes outward on the pedals to keep their ankles from rubbing on the cranks. For me, anyway, the U-factor can be more important than the Q-factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: U factor measurement?
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:26 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], HammerTime2, Jaroslaw, MattSoutherden, Yahoo [Bot] and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. replacement crank decals? Or sprucing up a plain crank

in Road

davidalone

2

932

Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:52 am

davidalone View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Review of SQ labs 611 race

in Road

mambo

0

235

Mon May 19, 2014 7:14 pm

mambo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Giro Aspect Review

in Road

thatdkid

1

660

Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:52 am

Tqubed View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. KCNC Garmin Mount Review.

in Road

Shortsocks

4

667

Tue May 20, 2014 1:42 pm

53x12 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. UCI to review the 6.8kg weight limit rule

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

Tinea Pedis

39

4221

Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:01 am

xnavalav8r View the latest post


It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 2:48 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB