Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:00 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 763
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
NeilPryde has showed a new lightweight frame, sub 750 gram for production is pretty good. not the lightes, but looks really good and interesting design: http://www.bikeradar.com/road/news/arti ... ok--33370/


Top
   
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:33 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Location Location!
I've been interested to see what Neil Pryde came up with next. Light-weight seems to be the route they're going with this model. Did you hear any aero-dynamic properties being touted in the overview? I hope they're not sacrificing that aspect of design in order to achieve an arbitrary weight savings.. The frame itself kind of reminds me of the BMC Team Machine.

And.. I can't wait to see that TT frame!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 763
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
they said nothing about aero on that frame, but as I se it, if you whant a full aero frame (from NeilPryde), it´s the Alize that is the frame to get. and yes, the TT bikes look really good, both TT models.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:24 am
Posts: 599
Nice weight but I don't see the appeal in awful matte black paint jobs that make the thing look plastic. Absolutely hate the paint job - matte black is not badass.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 763
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
CarpetFibre wrote:
Nice weight but I don't see the appeal in awful matte black paint jobs that make the thing look plastic. Absolutely hate the paint job - matte black is not badass.


at the same time, that is a prototype, with manly is for testing :D and light = no paint :D but i sues they will have custom paint option on this as on the other models.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
I'm not 100% sure I believe that weight.

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:24 am
Posts: 599
JensW wrote:
at the same time, that is a prototype, with manly is for testing :D and light = no paint :D but i sues they will have custom paint option on this as on the other models.


Oh sweet. :thumbup:


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 763
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
gumgardner wrote:
I'm not 100% sure I believe that weight.


i gues will will find out :D i can just say that they weight that they mention on the site on the Alize and diablo frames is pretty spot on. my alize, in the painted version (that should be heavier), was 1036 grams for a 56 (they say 1040 gram). it was the same with diablo. so i don´t se why they would lie about this, specially considering that it was lighter from the beginning, and that they say sub 750 gram, and not i exact weight. but as i said, we will se in september :D


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:08 pm
Posts: 1365
I like it, looks great and im sure the weights will be fine. I think one of their pre-production models was 680grms. Lets face it a lot of bikes are starting to come in under 800grms , be interested to see what the new trek will weigh.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:51 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 3684
Location: Tucson, Az.
CarpetFibre wrote:
Nice weight but I don't see the appeal in awful matte black paint jobs that make the thing look plastic. Absolutely hate the paint job - matte black is not badass.


The more paint you have the more the frame weighs.


gumgardner wrote:
I'm not 100% sure I believe that weight.


While I never like to believe claims before a production anything is released, I bet they're pretty close to spot on. I spoke with them a few weeks ago about this bike and why they were making it heavier since they already had a working sub 700 gram and while they want to make something light, they want to make it stiff and ride worthy. So at least they aren't totally fixated on weight.

JensW wrote:
but as i said, we will se in september :D


Luckily we won't have to wait that long.

_________________
Fair Wheel Bikes

Fair Wheel Blog

Instagram


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 am
Posts: 852
Location: Utah
It will be one of lightest if it is actually what it is claimed. (which seems to be the case :D )

It appears most of the claimed wieghts have not bee at all accurate.
(ie, EVO=697 for a 56 size, BH, etc... it seems like teh cliche now is "696gm" then all we see is a size 52 frame that is just over that weight, I should say I am being a little sarcastic, before someone post a picture of an Evo sice 54 that is close to the claimed wieght. )

I like it. But this is WW so.......


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 763
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
madcow wrote:
Luckily we won't have to wait that long.


you are probably right :D

my impression of NeilPryde is that they are really serious about what they do, and has the "economical muscles" to not have to taking shortcuts, and to be able to use a wind tunnel even if it cost a lot. it´s a interesting brand.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:24 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 3684
Location: Tucson, Az.
JensW wrote:
madcow wrote:
Luckily we won't have to wait that long.


you are probably right :D

my impression of NeilPryde is that they are really serious about what they do, and has the "economical muscles" to not have to taking shortcuts, and to be able to use a wind tunnel even if it cost a lot. it´s a interesting brand.


Jens I have to agree with you. To be totally honest when I first saw Neil Pryde bikes my initial thought was, "oh, another off the peg frame that's being re-branded." And with that I totally dismissed the brand. Then the more I found out about them the more I was intrigued, and then completely impressed with them. They may be new to the game but they certainly aren't cutting any corners. They are a large, extremely well funded company that really does seem interested in making things better, not just something that sells (and they seem willing to spend the money on actual R&D unlike so many others) I see a lot of different things from plenty of new companies every year, but unlike many of them NP is actually quite exciting for me.

_________________
Fair Wheel Bikes

Fair Wheel Blog

Instagram


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 763
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
I can say that they have exe lent service to, with i find as a big plus in my book as a customer. not hard to have to do with, as some other companies.


Top
   
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:45 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 am
Posts: 852
Location: Utah
I have been doing a little research eversince the FWB video of the "tricksters" on NP bikes.

I really hope they go a long way.

I only wish that the frame could allow other seatposts, becasue this is definitly a WW frame, but thats not too big of deal.

That is a specific shape post..correct? I hope I am wrong.


Attachments:
1331207603869-1itio1u2gp548-670-75.jpg
1331207603869-1itio1u2gp548-670-75.jpg [ 36.21 KiB | Viewed 4682 times ]
Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any Neilpryde Bura SL owners out there?

in Road

grnrcr

5

617

Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:10 am

Birdman View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Framesets next build revised Bura SL or TCR SL or Helium SL

in Road

Lincs

0

204

Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:15 pm

Lincs View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. NeilPryde Nazare for larger rider?

in Road

kevhogaz

1

330

Fri Mar 18, 2016 8:30 am

stormur View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New (Spring 2016) NeilPryde BURAsl, Facebook teaser

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

Birdman

42

3602

Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:33 am

Jhomewood View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: defride, emcardle, mnmasotto, MSNbot Media and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited