Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sat Apr 30, 2016 8:00 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken

Those bugs will be fixed ASAP (next few days) as they are unfortunately more serious than expected.

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:30 am
Posts: 846
Location: So Cal
I got it because its bling yo! :beerchug:
I do notice some of the gold coating wearing off where it contacts the front derailleur.

Didn't feel any different than the DA7900 chain it replaced.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 800
I ordered a X10SL off ebay and it weighed 259 for 116 links, heavier than expected. I really doubt a $50 chain is worth making a counterfeit version for it, but I think it is highly possible that they are selling last generation's model from 3-4 years ago, which may have been heavier.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Northeast USA
I had a period of about 4-5 years where I kept breaking chains (mostly Shimano and SRAM)... at least 1-2/year, sometimes more.
I got in the habit of bringing a mini park chain tool on every ride.
Then I switched to the X10SL. Haven't broken a chain in 4 years using it. It's getting to be a little silly carrying around the chain tool now...

I really don't care if it's gold, silver, or covered in a pink daisy flower pattern - as long as it works. So far, I've only tried the gold version... maybe 10 chains so far. Usually it doesn't look very "gold" due to all the long rides and neglect that I abuse it with.

Go for it and try it out.

_________________
AX Vial Evo: 4970g
Addict SL : 5235g
My Cycling Blog
Strava: Wayward Cyclist


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:30 pm
Posts: 88
I've used mine for around 1000miles and it looks like new. Have removed and degreased it a couple of times and the shift quality is superb. Buy it.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 313
jvanv8 wrote:
I had a period of about 4-5 years where I kept breaking chains (mostly Shimano and SRAM)... at least 1-2/year, sometimes more.

Usually it doesn't look very "gold" due to all the long rides and neglect that I abuse it with.


Maybe that's why your chains don't last :smartass:

I double make sure the connection is good when attaching a new chain and de-grease it once in a while and never let it make any noise from lack of lube....never broke a single Shimano chain (oh darn....I've just jinxed myself :|). Or maybe I don't produce anywhere near the watts you do :oops: .

_________________
It's not how much you spend on a bike it's how hard you can ride it.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:08 pm
Posts: 1365
Ive rode most of the high end chains and found no difference in performance .


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:30 am
Posts: 144
I was using KMC X10 I bought 4 of these really cheap from ribble.
It was noisy and I had shifting problems with SRAM cassette and Ultegra derailleur.
Switched to the KMC X10SL and it made a big difference. Quiet and smoother shifting.
I think I paid $40 on ebay.
It looks great and the gold color makes me want to clean it more often which is a good thing.
I don't keep track of miles so I can't speak to durability but so far it is wearing fine.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:09 pm
Posts: 871
I've used both, just swapped the gold fro a regular. Can't tell any difference.

People always said the Gold looked cool on the bike though.

You can get them on the bay inexpensively either way. Up to you.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:18 pm
Posts: 617
"Black" is the new black when it comes to bling! :mrgreen:

Image

_________________
Project CAAD9 7.2kg
The CAAD Build Thread


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 5103
Location: Bay Area
No, no KMCs are. I've had several and none are as quiet or smooth shifting (perceived) than as stock Shimano/Campy mid to top tier chains. Several of my Gold KMCs ended up having cracked links, they didn't last very long, and they weren't worth the extra cash. I've used them all on the same bike, with the same adjustment, and same number of links. Odd that they're the only ones I've had problems with and I generally ride enough to go through a chain every 2-3 months. My last KMC lasted maybe 7 or 8 weeks.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Gramz
Strava


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 5086
Location: Athens, Greece
KWalker wrote:
none are as quiet or smooth shifting (perceived) than as stock Shimano/Campy mid to top tier chains.

I agree. KMC is not as quiet or smooth but its rather close in performance.

_________________
My 6696gr Cipollini Bond
My 8618gr Colnago Master X-light
My 9745gr Pinarello Dyna


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 5103
Location: Bay Area
KMC chains cost more stateside than their main brand counterparts so I don't see the value.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Gramz
Strava


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:18 pm
Posts: 617
IMO, well worth it.
But in Black!

Image

Image

_________________
Project CAAD9 7.2kg
The CAAD Build Thread


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:25 pm
Posts: 313
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia / The Hague, Holland
2ndgen wrote:
IMO, well worth it.
But in Black!

Image

Image


To me that looks like a chain that's not cleaned properly ;)

_________________
2010 Guerciotti Whisper
2007 Bianchi 928L (update Sep '11)
1999 Bianchi MegaPro 25CrMo4


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:11 pm
Posts: 255
Location: Columbus, Ohio
I have both the X10SL (gold) and the X10SL-DLC (black) and am very pleased with them: look great, function just as good as DA and weigh a good bit less on my scale than the DA I replaced. Plus, with some patient shopping online, I was able to buy the gold for the same price as a DA chain and snagged the blingy black for $85.

_________________
Wilier Cento1 SR
13.10 lbs (5.95 kgs) w/Enve 3.4-Tune 70/170 & Conti Competitions tubulars
12.53 lbs (5.68 kgs) w/FarSports 24-Extralite & Vittoria CX EVO II tubulars


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Robin-, AZR3, Delorre and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited