Page 2 of 2
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 6:55 pm
by Gearjunkie
Hi Nic
My problem is the opposite of yours. My chain rings (DS obviously) are too close to the frame causing the same issue as the OP.
My set up is SISL2 (but with TA chain rings, not the Spidering) on a Cannondale Evo Black Inc. Installed as per instructions, 2.5mm spacer on DS, larger spacer on NDS.
I'm thinking of adding more spacers to the DS but concerned that will mess with the overall length of the spindle and put the Q factor slightly out.
How can it be that we have the opposite problem?
Cheers
GJ
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 6:55 pm
by Weenie
Visit
starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:18 pm
by nicrump
I think your problem is the result of the spider and ring. Can you measure the Q both right and left from frame centerline? I assume you are using the 109 spindle since you mention the spacers.
mine is 76mm DS and 71mm NDS to the outside face where the pedal meets the arm
Gearjunkie wrote:Hi Nic
My problem is the opposite of yours. My chain rings (DS obviously) are too close to the frame causing the same issue as the OP.
My set up is SISL2 (but with TA chain rings, not the Spidering) on a Cannondale Evo Black Inc. Installed as per instructions, 2.5mm spacer on DS, larger spacer on NDS.
I'm thinking of adding more spacers to the DS but concerned that will mess with the overall length of the spindle and put the Q factor slightly out.
How can it be that we have the opposite problem?
Cheers
GJ
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 5:15 pm
by Svetty
It's a 'design feature' of the frame
. If you move the spacer to the NDS you'll likely get the chain rubbing on the inside of the outer ring when using the inner ring and the outer sprockets of the cassette. The best solution I found was to try and optimise the set-up by trial and error, firstly to identify how many of the thin spacers are needed overall to get the correct wavy washer compression, and then to determine exactly how many of these spacers are needed on each side to get the best compromise with respect to chain-line vs ring rub.
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:19 am
by ms6073
Alternately (but more expensive) get a set of the SISL2 crank arms which I think are slightly asymmetric to address such issues.
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:15 pm
by nicrump
Svetty wrote:It's a 'design feature' of the frame
. If you move the spacer to the NDS you'll likely get the chain rubbing on the inside of the outer ring when using the inner ring and the outer sprockets of the cassette. The best solution I found was to try and optimise the set-up by trial and error, firstly to identify how many of the thin spacers are needed overall to get the correct wavy washer compression, and then to determine exactly how many of these spacers are needed on each side to get the best compromise with respect to chain-line vs ring rub.
yes, already know this as a solution. just wanted to know if that really is what they intended. apparently so. the chainline sucks out of the box.
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:16 pm
by nicrump
thats is exactly what we are talking about.
ms6073 wrote:Alternately (but more expensive) get a set of the SISL2 crank arms which I think are slightly asymmetric to address such issues.
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 10:17 am
by Svetty
yes, already know this as a solution. just wanted to know if that really is what they intended. apparently so. the chainline sucks out of the box.
Seemingly so. The change in spindle design does move the chainline relative to the older one. This [speculation mode] might be associated with Shimano reverting to a narrower space between rings after the wider spacing with 7900 and 6700 [/speculation mode] and the consequential effect on ring rub referred to above.
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:03 pm
by Gearjunkie
nicrump wrote:I think your problem is the result of the spider and ring. Can you measure the Q both right and left from frame centerline? I assume you are using the 109 spindle since you mention the spacers.
mine is 76mm DS and 71mm NDS to the outside face where the pedal meets the arm
Gearjunkie wrote:Hi Nic
My problem is the opposite of yours. My chain rings (DS obviously) are too close to the frame causing the same issue as the OP.
My set up is SISL2 (but with TA chain rings, not the Spidering) on a Cannondale Evo Black Inc. Installed as per instructions, 2.5mm spacer on DS, larger spacer on NDS.
I'm thinking of adding more spacers to the DS but concerned that will mess with the overall length of the spindle and put the Q factor slightly out.
How can it be that we have the opposite problem?
Cheers
GJ
Hi
I get 75.2mm DS and 73.6mm NDS but (even though those numbers are to the tenth of a mm) my measuring might not be too accurate, I found it hard to be sure I was measuring accurately to the centre line and the crank arm face.
Cheers
GJ
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 4:50 am
by thisisatest
Hollowgram cranks used to have a chainline that was too far to the left compared to everyone else. It was way out of spec. That is why you had to do so much fiddling to get SRMs to clear frames. Never had to fiddle with other SRM cranks. Then PF30 came out, the lip on the cups takes yet more room away, someone at Cannondale woke up and decided go even everything out. At the same time they got rid of the pointless sloulder on the spindle, all it did was complicate matters (mainly when you're trying to do things beyond what was intended). So 109 puts the chainline at 43.5mm, just like everyone else. With that, no PF30 specific lockring, no PF30 specific spider, nop SRM specific anything is ever needed. It is how it should have been all along.
@Svetty,
I'm not aware of Shimano reverting back to closer chainring placement with 11sp. Sure seems like there's a wide sloping shelf on the left side of the big ring. I haven't measured though. Can you confirm?
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 8:42 am
by CrossRob
Can anyone tell me the width of the NDS spacer please for BB30 on the 109mm spindle?
I've got a (non-Cannondale) 68mm shell and am switching to the 109mm spindle to fix a chainline problem.
The SISL2 instructions show a massive NDS spacer for 68mm shells - much wider than the 2.5mm one on the drive side.
http://media.cannondale.com/media/uploa ... r_1012.pdfSomeone above's said that you can use standard SRAM 2.5mm spacers, but how many would I need for the NDS? Instinct suggests just one (as it's a 5mm wider axle and we're adding a 2.5mm spacer to the DS) but am I missing something?
Thanks
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:45 pm
by shoemakerpom2010
you will have to use 3 2.5mm spacers. You can also have a Cannondale shop order that special spacer or buy the spacer kit from Cannondale Experts.com. Either way do not deviate from the directions in the pdf and it will install correctly. Any deviation leaves you short of threads to have the crank arm bolts on correctly.
Re: Hollowgram chain line
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:00 pm
by CrossRob
shoemakerpom2010 wrote:you will have to use 3 2.5mm spacers. You can also have a Cannondale shop order that special spacer or buy the spacer kit from Cannondale Experts.com. Either way do not deviate from the directions in the pdf and it will install correctly. Any deviation leaves you short of threads to have the crank arm bolts on correctly.
Excellent - thanks.