Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:18 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 435 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 929 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:11 am
Posts: 32
My current bike does fit - but its the only fit I have ever known. I'm wondering if the 58 would fit me "better". I do have consistent hand numbness problems - though I have been properly fitted on my bike. The only thing wrong with my current fit that has been pointed out to me is that my handlebars are slightly too shot in width.
I do have a unique build. Square like - that is, the width of my arms is the same length of my legs.

The problem is, I'm not sure what aspects of my fit could be improved as this is the only road bike I have ever been on. I couldn't tell you if my reach is off or not. Are there certain things I should be aware of next time I take my bike out to determine what will make a better fit when purchasing my next bike?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2690
Location: Mississippi
Those numbers are pretty close to mine. I was fit on a 58 and I always felt like it was too big so I took it upon myself to size down to a 56. I feel like my fit is much better now. I guess I am between sizes and I have always heard to size down.

_________________
Mosaic RS-1
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=138478

Cielo by Chris King Cross Racer
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=134376


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2529
Hand numbness might be caused by too much weight on your hands, and the excess weight is often the result of the saddle being too far forward. Your LBS is likely to suggest raising the bars to solve the problem, but that's not the proper solution.

With your long torso, what stem length are you using?

The reason that I mention stack and reach is that there are only small differences between frame sizes and a 56 or 58 can be made to fit the same. The 58 would use 2cm less spacer under the stem and probably one size shorter stem.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:11 am
Posts: 32
DaveS wrote:
Hand numbness might be caused by too much weight on your hands, and the excess weight is often the result of the saddle being too far forward. Your LBS is likely to suggest raising the bars to solve the problem, but that's not the proper solution.

With your long torso, what stem length are you using?

The reason that I mention stack and reach is that there are only small differences between frame sizes and a 56 or 58 can be made to fit the same. The 58 would use 2cm less spacer under the stem and probably one size shorter stem.


Stem reach (c-c) is about 3 and 3/4 inches. 9.5 cm 95mm


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:03 am
Posts: 8
+1 on a 56 if size is the ETT particularly since you are using 95mm stem. I will take a smaller bike than a slightly larger (longer TT) bike. If you have the flexibility to get your back lower, I would say go for 58 but be forewarned that it may cause you numbness in hand and neck.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2529
It makes no sense to try a larger frame is you're using a stubby 90-100mm stem. That's probably a fitting error too. With a long torso, 110-130 would be more common.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:23 am
Posts: 1047
Location: Pack filler
Mr USPS...
Having seen your bike in the intro gallery, one of the things thats probably confusing you is your bike.
Those old madone's had notoriously short headtubes, so its posssible that is the reason you were getting uncomfortable, as you could be getting weighted more on the hands.

Like daveS says, manufacturers sizing means very little. I ride 51.5, 52 54 and 56cm bikes depending on who's it is..


Go round the shops and try as many different bikes and "shop experts" as you can. You will know when it feels right and whether what they say is BS....

_________________
Official cafe stop tester


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:40 am
Posts: 645
I used the sizing guide on the canyon website and it put me on a 60/XL sized bikes. Right now I ride a XXL/61 scott cr1(pre addict one) with a 130mm -17 degree stem with 5mm of spacers under it. My fit feels good right now. I am 192cm tall, cycling inseam of 91cm, saddle height at ~83cm. The aeroad head tube is shorter geometry wise than on the cr1 I believe. I contacted canyon about if my seat height is possible on a L size aeroad and they told me "yes but with the post extended to the max line". What would you say guys? Size down or go with an XL.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 84
Location: Hungary/Budapest
Hey everyone!

Im kinda new on this forum, but been lurking here some time now. Being this my first comment, please bare with me, and excuse me, if my question is stupid. I've been riding track frames for the past 8 years now. I had a 55 cm frame, which was great. Right now i ride a 54 cm track frame with a 130mm, -10 thomson stem, no spacers, with Ritchey Logic II. road bars, and with a straight seatpost, had no problems riding 100+ kilometers with this setup. I'm 176 cm tall, and 70 kgs. I have pretty long arms. I'm really flexible, as i did springboard diving for 3 years, and stretching was a really big part of everyday training. Right now im gathering parts for my road bike project, so finding the right sized frame and parts is a big question. I'd like to get a very similar position on my future road bike. I know, its two different kind of bikes. I've read a lot about this topic, but theres so many opinions. I'd like to use a 130mm stem, with straight seatpost, without spacers. My main concerne is that, if i get a 54 cm frame and set it up with a 130 mm long stem + brake hoods (+60mm or more), than my reach might be too far. I'm thinking about going down one frame size, 52 cm. I know this is a very difficult topic and it depends a lot on body dimensions, arms lenght, neck lenght, hip flexibility and so on... What do you guys think? Anyone with similar height, riding a 52cm frame using long stem? Thanks in advance!


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 562
Location: Switzerland
esfrost wrote:
Hey everyone!

Im kinda new on this forum, but been lurking here some time now. Being this my first comment, please bare with me, and excuse me, if my question is stupid. I've been riding track frames for the past 8 years now. I had a 55 cm frame, which was great. Right now i ride a 54 cm track frame with a 130mm, -10 thomson stem, no spacers, with Ritchey Logic II. road bars, and with a straight seatpost, had no problems riding 100+ kilometers with this setup. I'm 176 cm tall, and 70 kgs. I have pretty long arms. I'm really flexible, as i did springboard diving for 3 years, and stretching was a really big part of everyday training. Right now im gathering parts for my road bike project, so finding the right sized frame and parts is a big question. I'd like to get a very similar position on my future road bike. I know, its two different kind of bikes. I've read a lot about this topic, but theres so many opinions. I'd like to use a 130mm stem, with straight seatpost, without spacers. My main concerne is that, if i get a 54 cm frame and set it up with a 130 mm long stem + brake hoods (+60mm or more), than my reach might be too far. I'm thinking about going down one frame size, 52 cm. I know this is a very difficult topic and it depends a lot on body dimensions, arms lenght, neck lenght, hip flexibility and so on... What do you guys think? Anyone with similar height, riding a 52cm frame using long stem? Thanks in advance!


to start with, can you let us know where the contact points are of the fit that you would like to replicate ?

saddle height, saddle setback (make and type of saddle), handlebar drop and reach as in nose of saddle to centre of top of handlebar


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 84
Location: Hungary/Budapest
Sure, and sorry for the lack of info.

Saddle: Selle Italia SLR
Saddle Height: 175mm (from the top of seatpost collar)
Saddle Setback: 0. (Thomson Elite, Straight, the saddle sits in the middle of the rails)
Handlebar: Ritchey Logic II. - 82mm reach, 142mm drop
Saddle to centre of top of handlebar: 565mm

I hope this helps.

Thanks in advance!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 1:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:44 pm
Posts: 113
Hi,

I ride a 56 cannondale ss evo but plan to downsize my frame to a 54.
I'm 181cm tall with a 83cm inseam. bb to saddle is 73.5cm.
My current 56 frame has a 15.5cm headtube, where the 54 size has 14cm.
I only use the 25mm supersix conical spacer under my -12deg/110mm stem(115mm actual)
To be able to simulate the drop of a 54 frame by using the same conical spacer again, i lowered the stem 1.5cm and took some pictures.
What do you think about my downsize choice?
Note:Drop will be about same, and reach will be 1.5cm closer with a 54 frame, different from the pictured 56 frameset
When looking at the pictures, i also find out that, i have to lower my seatpost about 0.5cm(last picture) :mrgreen:

Image

Image

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:18 am
Posts: 195
Yes, based on the last picture, your seat is obviously too high, unless you're sitting on the far back edge of the saddle in that one. It looks like more than 0.5cm.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 6:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 562
Location: Switzerland
esfrost wrote:
Sure, and sorry for the lack of info.

Saddle: Selle Italia SLR
Saddle Height: 175mm (from the top of seatpost collar)
Saddle Setback: 0. (Thomson Elite, Straight, the saddle sits in the middle of the rails)
Handlebar: Ritchey Logic II. - 82mm reach, 142mm drop
Saddle to centre of top of handlebar: 565mm

I hope this helps.

Thanks in advance!


not really

we're looking for saddle height as from the centre of the crank axle to the to of the saddle measured along the seat tube

handlebar drop as in the difference in height (measured from the floor) between to of the saddle and the top of the handlebar


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 6:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 562
Location: Switzerland
Boralb wrote:
Hi,

I ride a 56 cannondale ss evo but plan to downsize my frame to a 54.
I'm 181cm tall with a 83cm inseam. bb to saddle is 73.5cm.
My current 56 frame has a 15.5cm headtube, where the 54 size has 14cm.
I only use the 25mm supersix conical spacer under my -12deg/110mm stem(115mm actual)
To be able to simulate the drop of a 54 frame by using the same conical spacer again, i lowered the stem 1.5cm and took some pictures.
What do you think about my downsize choice?
Note:Drop will be about same, and reach will be 1.5cm closer with a 54 frame, different from the pictured 56 frameset
When looking at the pictures, i also find out that, i have to lower my seatpost about 0.5cm(last picture) :mrgreen:



Image


it looks like you sit too high, but by more than 0,5 cm

can you verify the 73,5 bb axle to top of saddle (measured along the seat tube), it looks quite a bit more

i have a 54 with 2 cms less saddle height, but the saddle sits quite a bit closer to the top tube than yours

i am considering going to a 52


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 435 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 929 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) new Bike size and fit questions

in Road

RQBL2016

5

493

Tue Jun 28, 2016 7:57 pm

Allen254 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fitting di2 to an old frame

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

smoby

19

1327

Thu Jul 07, 2016 12:26 pm

glepore View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Bike fitting on Colnago v1-r

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

pdiomidis

38

1537

Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:45 pm

wheelsONfire View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Frame questions + best frame you ever rode

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 ]

in Road

iliedanila

69

7723

Sun Jul 17, 2016 5:01 pm

jerrybrabus View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. buying an ebay frame from Canada...questions

in Road

chiltonp

2

389

Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:39 pm

BRM View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Juanmoretime, mdeth1313, mergeforthekill, MSNbot Media, nd2rc, sovereign and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited