Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:00 pm

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 2:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 276
So having decided to get a P2M power meter, I'm now faced with the choice of which crank for a Trek Boone 9.

I have SRAM Red crank at the moment w CX1 ring, so it is tempting to get a Force CX1 crank and the P2M spider. This is the cheaper option as Force CX cranks are readily available at c£100

The other option is a Rotor 3D24 all from power2max. It's unclear which option is lighter/stiffer. Intuitively I think I should get the carbon Force, but I figure I'll throw it out there for comments.

Thoughts?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 4:00 pm 
Offline
Administrator

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Posts: 6286
Location: Drenthe, Holland
I found myself thinking twice: 'get the force.' during reading your thoughts.

_________________
Quote:
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:22 pm
Posts: 120
I have both the 3D24 and SRAM Force and when I weighed them with the chain rings off I seem to remember there was only 1g difference. Having said that the Rotor crank feels stiffer (I suspect if you look at the numbers it isn't so I don't know why).

For £100 I'd get Force though as it will save you £80+ unless you can get a very cheap set of Rotor.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 276
So weight is basically even

The price difference between Rotor 3d24 full crank (incl tool) and SRAM spider only is £145. Force CX1 cranks are actually £120 unless I pick up one from eBay. So there's very little in it money wise, though with the Rotor I'd need to change my BB which would be a minor pain (it's BB90).

That said, the rotor crank interface looks slightly better than GXP? Pretty hard to find direct comparisons.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:50 pm
Posts: 645
Location: FIN
Rotor has 2 advantages : if you switch to Shimano / Campagnolo it still "fits" . Swapping chainrings is waay easier too ( not hidden bolt spider )- and you have "gazzilion" of options.

If you're absolutely 100% sure of using Sram "forever"- I would still choose Rotor ( frankly, I do have CX Sram Force22 equipped bike (exc brakes : TRP Revox here ) and Rotor crank.

_________________
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain


I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that ;)


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 6:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:19 am
Posts: 10
stormur wrote:
Rotor has 2 advantages : if you switch to Shimano / Campagnolo it still "fits" . Swapping chainrings is waay easier too ( not hidden bolt spider )- and you have "gazzilion" of options.

If you're absolutely 100% sure of using Sram "forever"- I would still choose Rotor ( frankly, I do have CX Sram Force22 equipped bike (exc brakes : TRP Revox here ) and Rotor crank.


Will the sram cranks not work with shimano? IS this new with 11 speed?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 276
I think he means "fits" more as in aesthetic than whether it works. It's a good point


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 12:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:50 pm
Posts: 645
Location: FIN
Exactly, that's why it was in "fits" not fits ;)

_________________
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Mark Twain


I can be wrong, and have plenty of examples for that ;)


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 276
I guess I should also consider Quarq riken. Same money. Heavier ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:22 pm
Posts: 120
Guess I should add that I'm on 10 speed.

I'd also say I've always found SRAM bottom brackets less weather resistant than (my only other experience) Shimano so that's a reason to go Rotor. Not a huge issue given the cheapness of BB's though.

I'm in the UK though and don't do as much maintenance as I should so if you're in a dryer country (or don't race through the winter like I have for the last few years), it may not bother you.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:51 pm
Posts: 610
Just because I happen to have just looked it up

Rotor 3D 24 110mm BCD 170mm arms = 530g (without BB & rings)

Praxis Clover 110mm 50/34 = 124g

Shimano 5800 Compact 50/34 170mm = 734g


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 276
racingcondor wrote:
Guess I should add that I'm on 10 speed.

I'm in the UK though and don't do as much maintenance as I should


Same and same


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blueturtle, cedced74, Joelk, mbrider, pyrahna, Ritxis, thumper88 and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited