HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:08 am
Posts: 8
There seems to be confusion about the R5ca seat tube angle (myself included). After careful measurements it looks like its a 71 degree seat tube, with 4mm of offset forward of BB center line.

I think it was a good decision going back to standard 73 deg seat tube with the Rca. I've had some difficulty getting the right fit with the R5ca with so much setback being forced on me..


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:35 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:08 am
Posts: 256
Got a geometry question, I ride a 49 SL4, does this mean I'd ride a 48 R5? but according to the geometry of both, the SL4 ha a 386mm reach while the R5 is 360mm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:20 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Denmark
DamonRinard wrote:
Hi virenque,



The Cervélo approach, sell what our pros race, was (and is) different: Instead of making the bikes the market wants, then fixing up some customs for our pros, we'd rather make the bikes our pros want, and then sell the same frames to the market. The other way doesn't make sense: we sponsor pro teams specifically so we can learn how to make better bikes. Why some companies don't incorporate those lessons into production bikes is a mystery to me.

I don't know if pros want this or not, but it seems a bit weird to me. Cervelo frames have a very "relaxed" geometri, when it comes to the bigger frames. It's the headtube I'm talking about here. :) A size 56 has a 17,3 cm headtube. while most other bikes is around 15,5 or less. And the 58 goes up to a ridiculous 19,9 cm. while others are around 17 cm. Off course every company should do it the way they think is the best. Cervelo don't have to do like anybody else. But...
Why are most pro's I see on Cervelos, using a -17 deg stem on the bigger frames, if the bikes are made for them, and not the average cyclist, who needs a lot more stackheight?
What about shortening the headtube in the bigger sizes. A 56 with a 16 cm headtube, and a 58, with maybe 17,4 and off course continueing in the even bigger sizes?
I'm no framebuilding expert, but I think it's safe to say that a shorter headtuber (which would also lead to a shorter toptube), would shave off more weight. And when the tubes gets shorter, there would be a bit less stress, and therefor the frame would be stiffer (I think :wink: ) But who am I to know. Cervelo got some pretty smart people working on this, so they are most likely right. I just think that it is very weird. And also it looks very stupid. :wink: I think the smaller (cervelo's 54 and under) looks great. And I think the geometri there, is perfect.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:08 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1960
Location: NoVA/DC
Only the head tube would be shorter. The top tube would be about the same size, depending on the preferred slope.
Extending the head tube places the headset bearings at the farthest ends, greatly increasing stiffness. As long as the preferred position can be achieved, it is the way to go.
I do think they went a little too far with it all. After all, all their bikes come with 40mm of spacers EXCEPT THE 61. The steerer tube is a typical 300mm, the max most forks are made with, and uncut it only fits 25 or 30. So they ought to cut down their head tubes at least 10mm to be true to their fit philosophy, or make a taller steerer for their 61s.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 416
Location: Switzerland
i think things went out of whack when cervelo increased the stack height of their largest size frame by 3 cm without adding a size to the number they had on offer, so they had to stretch the stack size jump going from size to size

(with most manufacturer, the indicated size closely matches the stack height, which imo is very practical)

all this to reduce the number of spacers that most weekend warriors (those that bring cervelos revenue) ran on their old geo cervelo's

the sad thing is, that viewing pictures of very many weekend warrior bikes of new geometry cervelos still show big spacer stacks, and those that need the reach have to run -17 degree stems, which imo looks ugly on a bike with a sloping top tube


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7492
Location: San Francisco, CA
Agreed.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:49 am
Posts: 1259
Ditto.

_________________
RideWert.com
Wert Cycling on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], euan, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], kode54, Method01, mnmasotto, Mockenrue, rmerka, wheelzqc, Yahoo [Bot] and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Used Cervelo S3 vs New Cervelo S3 - 4200 budget

in Road

Marloon

14

1206

Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:25 am

coppercook62 View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Cervelo R and Cervelo S series??

in Road

bigben99

3

1377

Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:09 pm

RichieE46 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2014 Cervélo R3 or S3

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

hlegs

30

18070

Wed Aug 27, 2014 5:05 pm

53x12 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) EE Brakes on Cervelo S5?

in Road

freemyheel

2

277

Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:07 am

newforker View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Wheels for Cervelo S5

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

FHKJ

17

1979

Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:06 pm

fogflip View the latest post


It is currently Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:29 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB