HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:17 am
Posts: 37
what is best a rotor power crank ,or garmin vector i have a garmin 810


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: powermeter
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7350
Location: San Francisco, CA
It depends on if you like Look Pedals. Right now Garmin Vector is proven good. Rotor had early issues. Both give L-R power. Vector will likely give some sort of pedal stroke analysis at some point reasonably soon. Rotor I don't know. Which is heavier depends on what you'd have for that part otherwise. Rotor should work better with oval chainrings, I'd hope.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: powermeter
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:18 pm 


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: powermeter
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:17 am
Posts: 37
Thanks I was thinking vector. I have more than 1 bike just don't know as I would have a spare rotor crank


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: powermeter
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 87
I like the idea of having power meters in my pedals. Easy to switch between different bikes - much easier than a crankset or a powertap hub inside a rear wheel.

However I have had crashes in the past that has completely torn the pedals into pieces. Never broken a crank in a crash though.

So personally I have bought Power2Max (with Rotor 3D crankset) and are very happy with them.

As far as pedal effectiveness/smoothness goes, science say that this isn't something that you should be concerned with. A good search should provide you with some valid data on this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: powermeter
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:17 am
Posts: 37
Thanks will keep looking


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 85
Location: phoenix, az
Given the reviews and feedback, I'm not sure I would go with either. I was pumped for vector to come out, but at its price point and with the extensive setup process, I'm not sure the benefit is really there. And rotor seems like it has a lot of potential, but also seems like they have a lot they need to sort out before you can buy in confidence.

I recently got a p2m, after the price drop, on rotor 3d+ cranks with the praxis works rings and couldn't be happier.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Posts: 2294
Location: On the bike
"Given the reviews and feedback, I'm not sure I would go with either. I was pumped for vector to come out, but at its price point and with the extensive setup process, I'm not sure the benefit is really there. "


Arguments can be made that it is priced competitively as you are getting two power meters for the price. Whether or not you want to agree with that is another issue.

What extensive setup process? You mean when you first install them and making sure they are torqued correctly? Once installed correctly, the process before each ride isn't any different than other pm on the market.


Last edited by 53x12 on Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:17 am
Posts: 37
Dam just wanted something easy to fit ect my mate is selling an srm rotor3d but it's got 175 arms and mine are 170 is this a problem


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 85
Location: phoenix, az
53x12, I mentioned the setup in regards to the selling point of being able to quickly and easily swap the pedals back and forth between bikes just like standard pedals. I have not installed vectors myself, but after reading Ray at DC Rainmaker's review and a few others, it takes much longer to set them up properly (when moving between bikes) than a simple pedal swap typically would. If you're simply installing them once, I would agree with you - it's probably just as much or even less time than installing a crank based system.

In regards to the price, I was initially excited when they were proposed to be launched at $1200. At $1700, there are a few crank based options for that or less, and a PT is considerably less.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:17 am
Posts: 37
Thanks for your input


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Posts: 2294
Location: On the bike
weekapaugin wrote:
53x12, I mentioned the setup in regards to the selling point of being able to quickly and easily swap the pedals back and forth between bikes just like standard pedals. I have not installed vectors myself, but after reading Ray at DC Rainmaker's review and a few others, it takes much longer to set them up properly (when moving between bikes) than a simple pedal swap typically would. If you're simply installing them once, I would agree with you - it's probably just as much or even less time than installing a crank based system.

In regards to the price, I was initially excited when they were proposed to be launched at $1200. At $1700, there are a few crank based options for that or less, and a PT is considerably less.


I think even DCRainmaker would agree the first time he installed them he didn't take the time to do it correctly. After he noticed the issue and installed them the right way there was no issue. I would agree that the time difference between swapping pedals and crank/crank arm is minimal if any.

The benefit of the Garmin is for those that have multiple bikes that have different cranks (BB30, BSA...etc.) and different wheels (training and racing). I am one of those as I have several wheels I use (no PT for me) and I have several bikes with different cranks (no Stages/Quarq/SRM). Garmin is the only viable option for me to make me happy. Plus all the cool analysis options that Garmin will soon incorporate.

Another benefit is for those that travel frequently and either rent or borrow a bike on their trip. Want power during your trip? Just throw on your Garmin pedals. Easy peasy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:17 am
Posts: 37
yes i think your right aim going garmin i have an edge 810 nice bit of kit


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7350
Location: San Francisco, CA
Big thing on Vector, I think, is to make sure the number of spacers correct and the torque is sufficient @ a relatively high (definitely not "finger-tight) spec. Still, I think the swappability assertion has been somewhat overestimated. It's not that challenging to swap a crank with the same bottom bracket.

Part of the return on investment on Vector is the promise for future pedal stroke analysis. It seems to me they focused on their core functionality for initial release, but the capacity is certainly there for some interesting numbers other than just L-R.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:12 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
53x12 wrote:
Garmin is the only viable option for me to make me happy. Plus all the cool analysis options that Garmin will soon incorporate.
Let's just hope that "Divine Cycling Group Acquiring Garmin Cycling Power Business" is not the next headline we read.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: noctilux, Ohnooo, Yahoo [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campagnolo Power Meter Choice (Vector or Stages with SISL2)

in Road

9x12man

12

1220

Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:24 pm

9x12man View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rotor Power Owners

in Road

Timujin

2

533

Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:46 pm

Timujin View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rotor conversion BB with C'Dale crank?

in Road

FastforaSlowGuy

4

323

Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:56 pm

eric View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rotor 3D Mountain vs Road crank installation

in Road

Getter

3

385

Tue Mar 11, 2014 5:08 am

jooo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campagnolo Power Torque crank - lose

in Road

Devon

3

425

Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:42 pm

graeme_f_k View the latest post


It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:18 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB