Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Wed May 04, 2016 11:27 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: CAT carbon cranks!!
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1709
Location: Kentucky, USA
just bought Sandro Mura's CAT cranks....got them in the mail 10 minutes ago and just weighed them....288 grams!!! they are unreal. i am going to install them tomorrow...I will keep you posted on how they are. They are so pretty!!!


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: CAT carbon cranks!!
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 1:43 pm
Posts: 751
Location: Belgium
Why did he sell them? Is he making an even lighter bike?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2004 5:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1709
Location: Kentucky, USA
do not know, he didn't say


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2004 5:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1709
Location: Kentucky, USA
here is a picture!!! PRETTY


Attachments:
cat.jpg
cat.jpg [ 85.75 KiB | Viewed 1126 times ]
Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:05 am
Posts: 33
Location: Chandler, Az
How come cat can make their crankset so light but FSA and all the other Carbon crank makers can't get theirs that light? Did CAT use a special process or what? they are some beauties.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 4:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2477
Location: Colorado
Anyone can make light cranks, it doesn't mean there stiff. Thats why no one else makes them that light. Unlike other cranksets the CAT and Storcks are hollow carbon construction, hence there ultra light weight design. Only drawback is they are relatively weak in comparison to other cranks. Do a search on the fourm, this question has been asked to death.

Just a little teaser, watch out for FSA in the very near future, new ultra light cranks are around the corner, and super stiff as well.

_________________
MAMA SAID KNOCK YOU OUT! HUH!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 63
Location: Hawaii
Superlite wrote:
Anyone can make light cranks, it doesn't mean there stiff. Thats why no one else makes them that light. Unlike other cranksets the CAT and Storcks are hollow carbon construction, hence there ultra light weight design. Only drawback is they are relatively weak in comparison to other cranks. Do a search on the fourm, this question has been asked to death.

Just a little teaser, watch out for FSA in the very near future, new ultra light cranks are around the corner, and super stiff as well.


Thanks Superlite! I read in a few triathlon magazines about the new FSA crank (I have the model name and release date, hope it's right,but i'll be hogging it so everyone drools first) and didn't know if it was a misprint since I couldn't verify it anywhere. I guess I'll stick with my campy alloy crank for now and wait for that new crank instead of buying a FSA superlight now.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1709
Location: Kentucky, USA
I have had FSA cranks and they look like junk compared to these beauties!!! Plus it is cool to have parts that not everyone owns....everyone I ride with and see has FSA cranks...........Boring being like everyone else!!!!!!!!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2477
Location: Colorado
Thats a pretty brash statement, considering FSA are far superior cranks and the most advanced cranks currently produced. Don't get me wrong, CAT cranks are cool, but in no way are they superior to FSA's carbon cranks. Those cranks you got are not anywhere close to the stiffness of FSA's.

_________________
MAMA SAID KNOCK YOU OUT! HUH!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 4:26 pm
Posts: 495
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Superlite wrote:
Thats a pretty brash statement, considering FSA are far superior cranks and the most advanced cranks currently produced. Don't get me wrong, CAT cranks are cool, but in no way are they superior to FSA's carbon cranks. Those cranks you got are not anywhere close to the stiffness of FSA's.


I think that is a pretty brash statement of yours SL :!:

How do you know CAT cranks aren't superior? I've never seen any tests comparing them (but then again, I don't think they are available in my 177.5-180mm needed lengths - neither are FSA SL's though).

Isn't the superior product the one that does the job best for the person using it?

_________________
Ride lightly!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1709
Location: Kentucky, USA
Ye Olde is totally right.........I just installed my CAT's and since we have 6 inches of snow, I haven't got to try the cranks on a long ride. I did ride them indoors, around a track and they are GREAT!!! My bike is now 11.9 lbs and the cranks alone shaved 150 grams. Stiffness is not a huge issue for me, being only 152 lbs......but so far they seem as stiff as my other carbon cranks. Hey Superlite, have you ever used CAT cranks or are your opinions based on stuff you read???


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:04 am
Posts: 149
cyclemanpat, do us all a favor, and post your bike specs.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2477
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Ye Olde is totally right.........I just installed my CAT's and since we have 6 inches of snow, I haven't got to try the cranks on a long ride. I did ride them indoors, around a track and they are GREAT!!! My bike is now 11.9 lbs and the cranks alone shaved 150 grams. Stiffness is not a huge issue for me, being only 152 lbs......but so far they seem as stiff as my other carbon cranks. Hey Superlite, have you ever used CAT cranks or are your opinions based on stuff you read???


It's inhearent to the design of the cranks that they are not as stiff, hollow carbon fiber vs. a carbon shell with carbon and ceramic reinforcements. There has not been any tests on CAT's but there has been tests on storck and FSA. Storck share the same type of construction as the CAT's and are about 1/3 the stiffness of the FSA's, 1/4 the stiffness of the new DA, so similar stiffness should be expected from the CAT's. Look around the web and you'll find the review, also did a post about this a few months ago with good information and comparisons.

Quote:
I have had FSA cranks and they look like junk compared to these beauties!!! Plus it is cool to have parts that not everyone owns....everyone I ride with and see has FSA cranks...........Boring being like everyone else!!!!!!!!


FSA's are far from junk, and they are the most advanced cranks produced (along with the new Campy Carbon). If they are so junky why are European teams riding a US product?



By the way, I saw the picture of your CAT's. Just wondering is that the only picture you took of them?

_________________
MAMA SAID KNOCK YOU OUT! HUH!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1709
Location: Kentucky, USA
I am actually getting around to that....I am still finishing it for the upcoming race season.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1709
Location: Kentucky, USA
I said they looked like junk compared to the Cat's. They perform nice, just much heavier than CAT. I think reading a review is great, but I believe that using a product is the best conclusion. To answer why are all those teams using FSA cranks.....well, sponsorships!!! CAT's were never produced.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Carbon Cranks

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

wiRIDEfast

30

2603

Tue May 03, 2016 5:50 am

FreaK View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Raw carbon look on sram force cranks!

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

UncleJohn

24

2168

Sun Nov 08, 2015 11:47 pm

UncleJohn View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cranks for Di2 6870?

in Road

lostangeles

11

1260

Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:49 am

bluebee View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any info on BOR cranks

in Road

havana

5

594

Tue Sep 22, 2015 8:08 am

havana View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cannondale Si cranks - spiderring ?

in Road

ednino

1

536

Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:30 pm

N.T View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], liam7020, Yahoo [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited