Actual weight on a Super Record TI crankset

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Forum rules
Post Reply
Arc
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:06 pm

by Arc on Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:54 pm

Anyone got an actual real life weight on a Super Record Ti crankset (53/39 175mm) ?

When I look at shops there are almost as many different weights claimed as there are shops.
Even camp's own site has same weight on all cranks, no matter if its 170mm or 175mm, compact or not - which hardly seems correct either.
Top

by Weenie on Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:54 pm

Top
User avatar
Calnago
Posts: 5641
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago on Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:10 pm

Here you go, a comparison of the 2009/2010 Super Record Crank, the 2011 Ti Super Record Crank, and the Campy/SRM Crank
Image

Weights (all cranks are 175mm with 53/39 chainrings):
Lightest to Heaviest:
2011 Super Record Ti: 596 grams
2009/2010 Super Record Steel (assume 2011 Steel Super Record is the same or very close): 658 grams
Campy/SRM Powermeter: 796 grams
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Top
User avatar
HammerTime2
Posts: 5427
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed

by HammerTime2 on Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:24 pm

Arc wrote:Even camp's own site has same weight on all cranks, no matter if its 170mm or 175mm, compact or not - which hardly seems correct either.

The asterisk footnote at the bottom of http://www.campagnolo.com/jsp/en/groupsetdetail/item_guarSRST_catid_12.jsp wrote:* The nominal weight refers to the lighter specification among the available options.
...
The nominal weight does not take account of the sometimes considerable quantities of grease used in the assembly of the products.
Although this does seem to be saying that a 170 39-52 standard weighs the same as a 170 34-50 compact, which seems dubious.
Top
Arc
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:06 pm

by Arc on Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:39 pm

Calnago wrote:Here you go, a comparison of the 2009/2010 Super Record Crank, the 2011 Ti Super Record Crank, and the Campy/SRM Crank

Weights (all cranks are 175mm with 53/39 chainrings):
Lightest to Heaviest:
2011 Super Record Ti: 596 grams
2009/2010 Super Record Steel (assume 2011 Steel Super Record is the same or very close): 658 grams
Campy/SRM Powermeter: 796 grams


Nice, thanks alot. Guess 2012/2013 is same ballpark as 2011 :)
Top
User avatar
Calnago
Posts: 5641
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago on Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:26 pm

Arc wrote:...

Nice, thanks alot. Guess 2012/2013 is same ballpark as 2011 :)


Yes, as far as I know the weights should be pretty much the same. The only change I'm aware of is that they beefed up the rings on the Compact cranks a bit since 2011 to accommodate the greater force that the EPS front derailleur exerts on them.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Top
Kneedragon
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:20 pm

by Kneedragon on Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:32 pm

For comparison's sake, my 2012 SR 53/39 172.5mm Ti cranks were 597grams.
Top

by Weenie on Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:32 pm

Top
Bridgeman
Posts: 631
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:04 am
Location: USA
Contact:
Contact Bridgeman

by Bridgeman on Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:35 pm

I have this crank and can't imagine using any other. Super good looking, functions as you would expect and above all, it's been set and forget.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Road”

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post