HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: CAT carbon cranks!!
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1699
Location: Kentucky, USA
just bought Sandro Mura's CAT cranks....got them in the mail 10 minutes ago and just weighed them....288 grams!!! they are unreal. i am going to install them tomorrow...I will keep you posted on how they are. They are so pretty!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: CAT carbon cranks!!
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 9:47 pm 


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: CAT carbon cranks!!
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 1:43 pm
Posts: 751
Location: Belgium
Why did he sell them? Is he making an even lighter bike?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2004 5:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1699
Location: Kentucky, USA
do not know, he didn't say


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2004 5:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1699
Location: Kentucky, USA
here is a picture!!! PRETTY


Attachments:
cat.jpg
cat.jpg [ 85.75 KiB | Viewed 966 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:05 am
Posts: 33
Location: Chandler, Az
How come cat can make their crankset so light but FSA and all the other Carbon crank makers can't get theirs that light? Did CAT use a special process or what? they are some beauties.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 4:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2477
Location: Colorado
Anyone can make light cranks, it doesn't mean there stiff. Thats why no one else makes them that light. Unlike other cranksets the CAT and Storcks are hollow carbon construction, hence there ultra light weight design. Only drawback is they are relatively weak in comparison to other cranks. Do a search on the fourm, this question has been asked to death.

Just a little teaser, watch out for FSA in the very near future, new ultra light cranks are around the corner, and super stiff as well.

_________________
MAMA SAID KNOCK YOU OUT! HUH!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 63
Location: Hawaii
Superlite wrote:
Anyone can make light cranks, it doesn't mean there stiff. Thats why no one else makes them that light. Unlike other cranksets the CAT and Storcks are hollow carbon construction, hence there ultra light weight design. Only drawback is they are relatively weak in comparison to other cranks. Do a search on the fourm, this question has been asked to death.

Just a little teaser, watch out for FSA in the very near future, new ultra light cranks are around the corner, and super stiff as well.


Thanks Superlite! I read in a few triathlon magazines about the new FSA crank (I have the model name and release date, hope it's right,but i'll be hogging it so everyone drools first) and didn't know if it was a misprint since I couldn't verify it anywhere. I guess I'll stick with my campy alloy crank for now and wait for that new crank instead of buying a FSA superlight now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1699
Location: Kentucky, USA
I have had FSA cranks and they look like junk compared to these beauties!!! Plus it is cool to have parts that not everyone owns....everyone I ride with and see has FSA cranks...........Boring being like everyone else!!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2477
Location: Colorado
Thats a pretty brash statement, considering FSA are far superior cranks and the most advanced cranks currently produced. Don't get me wrong, CAT cranks are cool, but in no way are they superior to FSA's carbon cranks. Those cranks you got are not anywhere close to the stiffness of FSA's.

_________________
MAMA SAID KNOCK YOU OUT! HUH!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 4:26 pm
Posts: 495
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Superlite wrote:
Thats a pretty brash statement, considering FSA are far superior cranks and the most advanced cranks currently produced. Don't get me wrong, CAT cranks are cool, but in no way are they superior to FSA's carbon cranks. Those cranks you got are not anywhere close to the stiffness of FSA's.


I think that is a pretty brash statement of yours SL :!:

How do you know CAT cranks aren't superior? I've never seen any tests comparing them (but then again, I don't think they are available in my 177.5-180mm needed lengths - neither are FSA SL's though).

Isn't the superior product the one that does the job best for the person using it?

_________________
Ride lightly!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1699
Location: Kentucky, USA
Ye Olde is totally right.........I just installed my CAT's and since we have 6 inches of snow, I haven't got to try the cranks on a long ride. I did ride them indoors, around a track and they are GREAT!!! My bike is now 11.9 lbs and the cranks alone shaved 150 grams. Stiffness is not a huge issue for me, being only 152 lbs......but so far they seem as stiff as my other carbon cranks. Hey Superlite, have you ever used CAT cranks or are your opinions based on stuff you read???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:04 am
Posts: 149
cyclemanpat, do us all a favor, and post your bike specs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 2477
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Ye Olde is totally right.........I just installed my CAT's and since we have 6 inches of snow, I haven't got to try the cranks on a long ride. I did ride them indoors, around a track and they are GREAT!!! My bike is now 11.9 lbs and the cranks alone shaved 150 grams. Stiffness is not a huge issue for me, being only 152 lbs......but so far they seem as stiff as my other carbon cranks. Hey Superlite, have you ever used CAT cranks or are your opinions based on stuff you read???


It's inhearent to the design of the cranks that they are not as stiff, hollow carbon fiber vs. a carbon shell with carbon and ceramic reinforcements. There has not been any tests on CAT's but there has been tests on storck and FSA. Storck share the same type of construction as the CAT's and are about 1/3 the stiffness of the FSA's, 1/4 the stiffness of the new DA, so similar stiffness should be expected from the CAT's. Look around the web and you'll find the review, also did a post about this a few months ago with good information and comparisons.

Quote:
I have had FSA cranks and they look like junk compared to these beauties!!! Plus it is cool to have parts that not everyone owns....everyone I ride with and see has FSA cranks...........Boring being like everyone else!!!!!!!!


FSA's are far from junk, and they are the most advanced cranks produced (along with the new Campy Carbon). If they are so junky why are European teams riding a US product?



By the way, I saw the picture of your CAT's. Just wondering is that the only picture you took of them?

_________________
MAMA SAID KNOCK YOU OUT! HUH!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1699
Location: Kentucky, USA
I am actually getting around to that....I am still finishing it for the upcoming race season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:44 pm
Posts: 1699
Location: Kentucky, USA
I said they looked like junk compared to the Cat's. They perform nice, just much heavier than CAT. I think reading a review is great, but I believe that using a product is the best conclusion. To answer why are all those teams using FSA cranks.....well, sponsorships!!! CAT's were never produced.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:45 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], jan erik, tinozee, Yahoo [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lightning cranks and Specialized carbon spider

in Road

dereksmalls

0

385

Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:19 am

dereksmalls View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 160mm cranks for TT?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

jockster

17

2146

Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:22 pm

gregalfa View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 180mm cranks

in Road

Phill P

6

536

Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:55 am

Causidicus View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Track cranks

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

mattyNor

18

1067

Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:59 pm

Geoff View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2 cranks or cannondale spidering

in Road

prebsy

11

974

Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:34 pm

prebsy View the latest post


It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:46 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB