Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am
Posts: 574
everyone is going proprietary on chainring design.
i don't this will work. shimano9000 110 spacing will become the new standard

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Current Rides:

2010 SWorks SL3/DI2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:41 pm
Posts: 553
Location: The Netherlands
spartan wrote:

Image


Somehow I am struggling to see the difference. But then again, I am no expert.

_________________
My Renovo R1 wooden bike project

Check it out: the most amazing vintage Colnago, Merckx and Pinarello collection


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:46 pm
Posts: 98
the black crankset on the right looks sort of like darkgray 6700 ultegra with the new bolt pattern (albeit the new FSA is carbon). i bet the next gen ultegra will look similar.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 218
Location: S.E. TN
If $ is in the equation and your in the market for bb30, new Sram Red blows everything else out of the water. $325-350 on eBay. Relist the heavy (and ugly) chainrings for $75 and buy some light ones.
You'll have a crank as light as a SISL for 1/2 the price.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:50 pm
Posts: 16
What's the difference between the K-Force light and the K-Foce light?

Can't even spell their own product name correctly???


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:41 pm
Posts: 352
imo they look grim


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:52 pm
Posts: 38
OMG this is ugly. I really like the look of the old Kforce light, but this one (like the DA9000) are horrible.

As for the "stress distribution" picture, they mean absolutely nothing since the scale isn't plot. This is TOTAL BS.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:38 am
Posts: 462
It's FSA, who cares (unless you want to break your face).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:19 pm
Posts: 388
FSA = Fail Supremely Again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 1782
Location: San Francisco Peninsula
All black one looks clean. Might get one in EVO386 for my bike.

_________________
2013 Wilier Cento1 SR || 2009 Ridley Crossbow || 2011 Yeti AS-R 5 Carbon


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1121
Location: In the industry
The illustration shows pedal at 1:30 position, which is not when the crank is most heavily loaded. Rather, 3:00 and 4:00 are more relevant.

However, it might be the most advantageous (albeit hard to tell) position for the K-Force.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
twitter: Falco_bike
Facebook: falco.bike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 133
from the FEA results, it looks like the new design stresses the chainrings (marginally) less over a smaller area than the 4 bolt and 5 bolt design, which could mean better front shifting. looks like an evolution if the shimano 4 bolt pattern.

But meh, I don;t think theres actually much of a difference from the shimano 9000 deisgn to actually bother. the shimano 4 bolt is going to be the new standard. FSA is just being different for the sake of it.

now if SHimano bought over this technology and made it the new standard, then we'd be talking... but FSA doesnt have the draw that shimano has...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Helmutti, sancle1 and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Look 695 frame (2014)?

in Road

Sparks

7

1795

Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:45 pm

Sparks View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano 2014

in Road

krtassoc

4

1308

Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:15 am

bura View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Trek Speedconcept 2 in 2014?

in Road

Pelle1994

13

2657

Thu May 16, 2013 6:10 am

trikobe View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano road components 2014

in Road

AGW

2

708

Sat Apr 27, 2013 6:48 pm

AGW View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Should I just force these two part together?

in Road

Y26

3

667

Mon May 13, 2013 11:26 am

SWijland View the latest post


It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 6:37 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB