HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:28 am
Posts: 543
Location: Northern California
A Lightning should be the lightest. That's what we have on our tandem. It is a light crank in a double, and the triple is only about 100 grams more. With Campy the new Athena, you can make use of 11-speed, for a total of 33 speeds. Wide spread of gears, but tight

The Lightning triple spider should fit on an S-Works crank. Thus if you have BB30, the S-Works is an option too.

I use a Praxis 53t outer chainring (for a double), and it shifts better than the TA that preceded it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 3674
Location: UK & WEST AFRICA
pow216 wrote:
The question was about weights of various triple cranksets. Not about peoples preferences to compacts or triples!

look online. most of the manufacturers disclose the weights.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:25 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:31 am
Posts: 314
tantra wrote:
As a former triple user and someone who mainly rides in the mountains, let me suggest one other option. Get a compact crankset and replace the 34t ring with a 33t ring (available from TA Specialites). Pair that with an 11-28 rear cassette and you very nearly have the same low gearing and gear range as a triple.


It always amazes me people seem to take pride in advertising to the world that they know absolutely nothing about bicycle mechanics. Triple cranksets using a 74mm bcd inner chainring can take a 24 tooth inner chainring. 24 teeth results in much lower gearing than 33 teeth. Much lower. How big the cassette you use does not depend on the crankset at all. So the rear cassette can be identical whether using a 110mm bcd compact or a 130/74mm bcd triple. The triple will give you much lower gearing than a compact.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:32 pm
Posts: 29
Location: Reims, France
Exactly! Rightly stated.

RussellS wrote:
tantra wrote:
As a former triple user and someone who mainly rides in the mountains, let me suggest one other option. Get a compact crankset and replace the 34t ring with a 33t ring (available from TA Specialites). Pair that with an 11-28 rear cassette and you very nearly have the same low gearing and gear range as a triple.


It always amazes me people seem to take pride in advertising to the world that they know absolutely nothing about bicycle mechanics. Triple cranksets using a 74mm bcd inner chainring can take a 24 tooth inner chainring. 24 teeth results in much lower gearing than 33 teeth. Much lower. How big the cassette you use does not depend on the crankset at all. So the rear cassette can be identical whether using a 110mm bcd compact or a 130/74mm bcd triple. The triple will give you much lower gearing than a compact.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 12:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:25 am
Posts: 748
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Well said. And can I join the triple love-in and say the following?

I don't just use a triple for the gear ratios. No. Using something like a 26t chainring like I do means I can cycle with 'normal' cadences even on the steepest of hills. No more low-cadence-crawling up steep hills.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 12:19 am
Posts: 62
RussellS wrote:
tantra wrote:
As a former triple user and someone who mainly rides in the mountains, let me suggest one other option. Get a compact crankset and replace the 34t ring with a 33t ring (available from TA Specialites). Pair that with an 11-28 rear cassette and you very nearly have the same low gearing and gear range as a triple.


It always amazes me people seem to take pride in advertising to the world that they know absolutely nothing about bicycle mechanics. Triple cranksets using a 74mm bcd inner chainring can take a 24 tooth inner chainring. 24 teeth results in much lower gearing than 33 teeth. Much lower. How big the cassette you use does not depend on the crankset at all. So the rear cassette can be identical whether using a 110mm bcd compact or a 130/74mm bcd triple. The triple will give you much lower gearing than a compact.


Certainly, you can put MTB components on a road bike and get still lower gearing. The small ring on most road triples is 30t. Since this is a weight weenie forum, I was suggesting a way to get a very decent low gear for climbing (33tx28t) without weight penalty or the fiddliness of a triple. There is no reason for rudeness. And yes, I do know a little about bicycle mechanics.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:29 am
Posts: 335
tantra wrote:
tantra wrote:
As a former triple user and someone who mainly rides in the mountains, let me suggest one other option. Get a compact crankset and replace the 34t ring with a 33t ring (available from TA Specialites). Pair that with an 11-28 rear cassette and you very nearly have the same low gearing and gear range as a triple.

Certainly, you can put MTB components on a road bike and get still lower gearing. The small ring on most road triples is 30t. Since this is a weight weenie forum, I was suggesting a way to get a very decent low gear for climbing (33tx28t) without weight penalty or the fiddliness of a triple. There is no reason for rudeness. And yes, I do know a little about bicycle mechanics.


Hi tantra, what you have written is 100% correct. Using an MTB 11-34 10spd cassette, compact 50/33 crankset, and a MTB M772/M972 SGS RD will give you low gearing of 33-34. Which is very low. Yes, a triple can run a smaller chainring then a 28T, as suggested even a 24T, which will allow one to use a closer ranged cassette, such as an 11-25, 11-28, or even an 11-32. A closer ranged cassette, like 11-25T, will provide closer cadence between RD changes.

A triple is usually heavier and we are talking road not off-road. A compact has a better Q and is a little easier to setup. Road RD's usually come in S or GS not SGS, where the GS form will allow an 11-32 and have a max total of usually 37T for Cassette and Crankset combination.
Eg. an 11-32 cassette = 21T, which will allow a max Crankset range of 16T. That is 21 + 16 = 37T.

You will need an SGS RD, which generally allow a max total of 43T to 45T, to extend the range of the crankset.
Eg. an 11-32 cassette = 21T, which will allow a max Crankset range of 22T to 24T. That is 21 + 22 = 43T or 21 + 24 = 45T.

Anyhow, both will work, and there are pro and cons for each arrangement.
As tantra mentioned the compact setup should be lighter and a little easier to setup and maintain.
This is why hi-end MTB's now run dual cranksets with an 11-36 cassette.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:32 am
Posts: 344
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Valbrona wrote:
Yes Campag triples are good, but they are not 110/74 BCD. Mr Campagnolo has not kind of worked out that triple uses generally want small chainrings.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Funniest thing I've read today. I had a triple once, so I could run a 55/42/39 (or something like that) then I realised I was being an idiot :?

_________________
My SwiftCarbon Ultravox

My Giant Defy Advanced


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 655
Location: so. cal.
The biggest problem for people that use triples is that most of the current groups do not support a triple configuration.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:23 am
Posts: 249
Location: Covington, WA
I'm not the sharpest of the weight weenies, but if you're interested in a light triple, and are willing to live with either a 34 or 36t as the middle ring, IRD offers a "triple-lizer" chainring that allows a 74bcd ring to be bolted to the 110bcd triplelizer ring.

http://www.interlocracing.com/triplizer.htm

So you can use any lightweight road compact double crank that uses a separate BB axle (BSA, ISIS, Cannondale, etc.). Because you'd have to use a slightly wider BB to get the middle ring to line up with the middle of the cassette (i.e. triple spacing).
The only cranks that might be off limits are ones with an integrated axle (with a fixed crank arm width). But even then, you might be able to live with the added 74bcd ring lining up with the 2nd or 3rd biggest cog on the cassette, assuming (a) your front derailleur could handle it,and (b) it doesn't rub the chainstay. That's where you'd be using that small ring anyway.
Otherwise just go with a variable BB crank.

Hey just suggestin'...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 2:18 pm
Posts: 5
Old style centaur triple with royce ti bottom bracket was said by my mechanic to weigh no more than veloce ultraorque compact with cups even after large chunks had been torn from the veloce due to the rubbish ultratorque puller.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Cronulla, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], hillrider, mentok, physeter, Tilldish, tinozee and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. AEST light weight crankset

in Road

yumseyo

7

1654

Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:13 pm

yumseyo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any experience with FSA SL-K Light Carbon BB30 crankset?

in Road

Ahillock

10

2445

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:11 pm

GT56 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campagnolo crankset weight without rings

in Road

gordon

2

591

Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:13 am

Devon View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Light weight helmet

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

MNX1024

20

1258

Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:38 am

neeb View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Light weight carbon handlebars

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

addictR1

31

3872

Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:09 am

fras23 View the latest post


It is currently Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:56 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB