Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:46 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:35 am
Posts: 566
AttacknowAttackoften wrote:
Slam That Stem, lose the conical spacer!


Why? Stem placement should be based on fit, not looks.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 140
topflightpro wrote:
AttacknowAttackoften wrote:
Slam That Stem, lose the conical spacer!


Why? Stem placement should be based on fit, not looks.


Firstly, and most importantly, everybody knows that's false. Form > Function.

Secondly, and of arguable importance, because it will shave weight, which was the original question, correct? But I was talking about the "slam that stem" dust cap, which is anodized for lightness, substituting the conical spacer for la lightweight option, when coupled with lightweight spacers.

_________________
I only train on days that end with "y".

Eli


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 11:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 221
Location: Northern Virginia
Can anyone post a pic of what this would look like without the conical spacer? I assumed the spacer was also covering bearings etc.

I'm open to trying this but want to be sure it's not going to look half baked.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:53 pm
Posts: 601
looks so much better without IMO

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 140
Yes, it's possible: see the pic Bianchi10 posted.

You can get really low with many low-stack stem caps...including ones specially designed for caad10's, which i think will work will with the supersixes, called ''Slam That Stem".

_________________
I only train on days that end with "y".

Eli


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Di2 cable routing + Praxisworks BB on non-Di2 Cdale frame

in Road

havana

10

512

Mon Sep 21, 2015 5:55 am

havana View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. SuperSix EVO HM - '13 vs '14 vs '15?

in Road

superdx

12

1492

Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:02 pm

4ibanez View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Supersix Evo V Hi-Mod

in Road

MikeyBE

14

1931

Fri Jan 01, 2016 4:50 am

njyeti View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2013 Supersix Value

in Road

eagle34

3

743

Fri Aug 14, 2015 6:32 pm

eagle34 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Best BB for a Cannondale Supersix EVO

in Road

xavier lord

13

1595

Thu Jun 02, 2016 2:44 am

xavier lord View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], GT56, Yahoo [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited