So this is the 2nd pix that I have seen were the sisl2 were not 484 do you think they have "add" material ? and isn't the new Campy over toque close to the same wight?
http://www.bikerumor.com/2013/07/23/han ... s-details/
I am on the fence on what crank to get : )
C
cannondale sisl2 + new compression plug details
Moderator: robbosmans
I weighed my 170mm SISL2 cranks with 50/34 spiderring, the 109mm spindle, the crank arm retaining bolts and the lockring for spidering. 482g. Same setup with 53/39 is 511g.
The pic you referenced also included the bottom bracket bearings and associated spacers and bearing covers.
As far as the link you posted, the Ultra was 560g in a compact (50/34) so 78g heavier. They didn't weight BB bearings at all.
For comparison, my 170 arm is 127g vs the Ultra at 144g..
I love the one piece design of the spidering, great front shifting with Red, super stiff...
The pic you referenced also included the bottom bracket bearings and associated spacers and bearing covers.
As far as the link you posted, the Ultra was 560g in a compact (50/34) so 78g heavier. They didn't weight BB bearings at all.
For comparison, my 170 arm is 127g vs the Ultra at 144g..
I love the one piece design of the spidering, great front shifting with Red, super stiff...
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com