Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 6898
Location: San Francisco, CA
I tried these only in a shop, not actually riding a bike, and they seemed to curve the wrong way for a wrist-neutral position on the tops.

Image

In fact, some of my favorite handlebars are those on my old city bike which sweep forward, not back, because when my hands are on the tops my arms are pointing inward and this allows my hands to point a bit inward as well.

Someone must be buying them, though. Is it because they let you get away with a longer, more pro-looking stem?

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
Send your data to Weight Weenie listings!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 956
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
The reach is still longer than most compact bars, at 82mm.

I think the curve of the tops would work for me. It's similar to the sweep of mtb bars. It's a natual position, at least for me. Perhaps I climb on the tops with my elbows in and you have them out.

If anyone is interested, now is a good time to buy them- they are on sale at about half off list at a bunch of places.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:27 am
Posts: 169
Location: Nu Zild
the evo-curve are not the same as your pic (which are the WCS evolution - ergonomic drop vs the shallow bend on the evo-curve).
I like them, partly because I can run a longer stem but also because the hood-drop distance is quite short in comparison to competing models (FSA K-Force shallow, 3T Ergosum). I think the standard Curve are nicer than the evo curve though


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:35 am
Posts: 396
I have those bars on one of my bikes.

The sweep is not an issue. It's actually kind of comfortable.

And I don't think the OP was referring to the Evo Curve bars but the curve, i.e. shape, of the WCS Evolution bars.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 2887
Location: DC
thencameyou wrote:
the evo-curve are not the same as your pic (which are the WCS evolution - ergonomic drop vs the shallow bend on the evo-curve).
I like them, partly because I can run a longer stem but also because the hood-drop distance is quite short in comparison to competing models (FSA K-Force shallow, 3T Ergosum). I think the standard Curve are nicer than the evo curve though


The Evo Curve have the same sweep.

Why buy a bar to run a longer stem if it does nothing for ergonomics?

I bought them on sale once not knowing about the top sweep and hated them. Its a stupid design and makes for less wrist clearance in the drops as well. awful bars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 6898
Location: San Francisco, CA
eric wrote:
It's similar to the sweep of mtb bars. It's a natual position, at least for me. Perhaps I climb on the tops with my elbows in and you have them out.


You answered your own question: the difference is on MTB bars the arms point outward, not inward.

If you have your elbows tucked that makes sense. If I'm up there my elbows are in-line with my shoulders or maybe slightly bowed out.

But you bring up an alternative explanation: they sweep them that way to make them look like mountain-bike bars.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
Send your data to Weight Weenie listings!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: Natovi Landing
I have the EvoCurve on two bikes - one bar in alu and one carbon. Love the shape and they are pretty stiff.

They are relatively long reach though to be honest I'd like still more.

What more can I say ... they aren't very WW I'm afraid. IIRC c.250g for carbon and about 25g more for alu.

Sweep back doesn't impact the stem length. It's position on the hoods that's most relevant for that, not position on tops.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: caballero, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], sancle1, shimmeD and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Ritchey WCS carbon curve bar

in Road

LionelB

4

587

Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:19 am

LionelB View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Have Zipp changed the curve on their traditional bars?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

iscarrr

17

1037

Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:41 pm

corky View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Ritchey Superlogic Headset

in Road

Boralb

2

373

Sat Aug 04, 2012 7:08 pm

dierix View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Ritchey Break-Away as primary bike?

in Road

valko

0

159

Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:09 pm

valko View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Anyone try the Ritchey sl carbon c260 stem

in Road

NWSAlpine

2

547

Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:33 pm

NWSAlpine View the latest post


It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 7:04 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB