Page 2 of 2
Re: King or Tune?
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 6:31 pm
by TOflat
Just make sure you're able to easily service whatever you buy, I've found that to be a pain these days.
Re: King or Tune?
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:59 am
by milroy
Thanks for the feedback. I didn't mean for this to become (yet another) debate on clinchers vs singles.
However, for the record, these will be on 3.4 clinchers. Not saying they are better that tubs - just for me they are more practical - and I'm not shy of fixing my own gear.
Furthermore I have used ENVE 45 clinchers in Sydney for at least 2 years without problem.
Re: King or Tune?
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:59 am
by Weenie
Visit
starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Re: King or Tune?
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:13 am
by sugarkane
milroy wrote:Furthermore I have used ENVE 45 clinchers in Sydney for at least 2 years without problem.
Where in Sydney do you ride? I have only met one WW member in Sydney so far
Re: King or Tune?
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:00 pm
by nspace
I haven't run Tune hubs before, but have a fair bit of experience with Kings. I love my R45's. Engagement is great and they spin very smooth. Warranty is awesome, and at least where I live, there is a much better support network via dealers for King stuff than Tune (since I can't yet afford the King tools).