HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 122 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
WMW wrote:
......Of course it isn't *practical*... ie you are never going to make these wheels *light* for the amount of work it will take, but it will be an interesting experiment.
...

I believe the rotational weight especially weight away from the rotational axis is important to climbing speed, static weight and weight of the hubs are less less important, although I have not yet 100% proved the point to myself. Cutting weight off the rims could have real substantial benefit to my climbing speed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:28 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 2:01 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7414
Location: Geeeelong!
Can we see some shots of this happening please?

Otherwise we're going around in circles and all it seems to be doing is creating headaches.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 2:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
SSB wrote:
I think it's the OP's attitude that's makes the whole project sound off-putting... If there was some scientific explanation, explaining how he did it, how it was calculated, how it affects the ride, how it remains stiff/safe, I would be very interested to hear since I have a set of R500s on the commuter (not that I would do it.) People take a drill to a lot of things around here, including shifters and derailleurs.

Instead it's gone something like "I'm going to do it and you're all twats for questioning me.", coupled with a number of thinly veiled insults and a know-it-all attitude that makes this thread a trainwreck.


I have re-read the whole thread a few times, my conclusions are :-
1. I could be new to all of you and I understand my User name is not presentable under European's eyes.
2. I have tried to be humble and polite to answer questions. I did not start the fight, I just fight back to protect my ground.
3. There are newbies to the subject who do not equip themselves with the necessary basic engineering knowledge before they open-fire/start the flaming.
There are others who think that the responses are negative right off the bat… none by anyone who had actually tried it... The responses are ‘’sky or earth’’, therefore it is really the altitude of person who read my posts while not my attitude that need to be rectified. It is the first impression of my idea to you that make the big difference, you think my idea is very stupid/ignorance and you look at me with scorn.
I have once heard Charles K. Kao (Father of Fiber Optic Communication) said ‘’ Never look down on ideas from others, not even from infants/young students.’’ :smartass: :up:


Last edited by kai-ming on Sat Aug 11, 2012 2:45 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 2:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
Tinea, my head is still clear and sharp. :mrgreen:
I suppose you have already read this viewtopic.php?f=3&t=105910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, care to give comments?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:46 am
Posts: 231
Location: Toronto
Personally, I find the idea interesting, but I'm no expert at this so I leave it to others to experiment with it first.

As I said before, intuitively to lots of people, it sounds like a bad idea, and you can't fault them to voice it as such. Prove them wrong and you'll gain credibility and respect. If you don't like negative criticism, then don't post on message boards, since that's part of the package deal.

I believe that you may have a rideable wheel done out of this, since R500s are probably so heavily built that there's that margin to remove some material. But without real-world safety testing (large companies probably trash hundreds of wheelsets in such testing), I'd prefer not to take the risk.

_________________
Flickr
2012 Cannondale CAAD10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:10 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1976
Location: NoVA/DC
kai-ming wrote:
I believe the rotational weight especially weight away from the rotational axis is important to climbing speed, static weight and weight of the hubs are less less important, although I have not yet 100% proved the point to myself. Cutting weight off the rims could have real substantial benefit to my climbing speed.

rotational weight affects accelerations, not constant-speed conditions. climbing is, for all practical purposes, constant-speed. dont give me the "micro-accelerations" argument, it doesnt work out in the end. so in these cases, the rim weight is no more important than the weight anywhere on the bike (and rider).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
I may be naive to believe what the moderator Tinea said - There's no need for crass language on here. .....what is socially acceptable and what is not.
edited, never mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:46 am
Posts: 231
Location: Toronto
Crass language is language that is rude and obscene, used in a manner to offend, attack or insult.

Swear words such as the "F" word is crass language in some contexts, but not always, for instance it can be used to express elation or surprise. Similarly, non-swear words, but a combination of ordinary words in a sentence may also be constituted as crass language.

I assume Cantonese is your main language, and the correct analogy is that you know there are a number of multi-word sentences that are very rude and offensive (e.g. ones that make reference to one's mother, or family), while the "5 words" (that refer to certain parts of the anatomy) in and by themselves in certain contexts may not be used in a rude manner.

_________________
Flickr
2012 Cannondale CAAD10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am
Posts: 1225
Location: by Crystal Springs (Sawyer Creek Trail)
thisisatest wrote:
kai-ming wrote:
I believe the rotational weight especially weight away from the rotational axis is important to climbing speed, static weight and weight of the hubs are less less important, although I have not yet 100% proved the point to myself. Cutting weight off the rims could have real substantial benefit to my climbing speed.

rotational weight affects accelerations, not constant-speed conditions. climbing is, for all practical purposes, constant-speed. dont give me the "micro-accelerations" argument, it doesnt work out in the end. so in these cases, the rim weight is no more important than the weight anywhere on the bike (and rider).


Lol, I instantly remembered this thread like it was yesterday. And yes, you are absolutely 100% correct in the engineering (and non-psychological) sense.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57554&hilit=micro+acceleration


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
I do these ''Swear words such as the "F" word is crass language in some contexts, but not always, for instance it can be used to express elation or surprise.'' all the time even with parts of the anatomy in series of words in one sentence , you know cantonese foul language? But not to stranger, especially not to stranger without hearing our tone or seeing our face expression. There is rule in Cantonese discussion board that all foul language like F words is not acceptable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
justkeepedaling wrote:
thisisatest wrote:
kai-ming wrote:
I believe the rotational weight especially weight away from the rotational axis is important to climbing speed, static weight and weight of the hubs are less less important, although I have not yet 100% proved the point to myself. Cutting weight off the rims could have real substantial benefit to my climbing speed.

rotational weight affects accelerations, not constant-speed conditions. climbing is, for all practical purposes, constant-speed. dont give me the "micro-accelerations" argument, it doesnt work out in the end. so in these cases, the rim weight is no more important than the weight anywhere on the bike (and rider).


Lol, I instantly remembered this thread like it was yesterday. And yes, you are absolutely 100% correct in the engineering (and non-psychological) sense.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57554&hilit=micro+acceleration" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I read that sometime ago, and I shall read that again.
There is certainly psychological help, it is not news that professional team leader need help from domestique to pace him up difficult climbs.
What about if I have poor strength that lower inertia wheels can help me achieve higher speed on difficult climb, while my endurance is good to keep the speed up, that is not something engineering at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:46 am
Posts: 231
Location: Toronto
Can we not turn this into a discussion of the English language? I think your command of English is good enough to understand that context is everything like in every other language on this planet, and certain tones/expressions can still be communicated through the internet (it's not as crystal clear as personal communication of course.) Saying "You're an F'in idiot" is crass no matter what, but saying "WTF" is not necessarily crass- it's an easy way to express extreme surprise or anger over the net.

_________________
Flickr
2012 Cannondale CAAD10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Posts: 7412
Location: Los Angeles / Glendale, California
Seriously. Just post pictures and this thread won't cause as much of a stir.
You posted a picture for your seat-post but you won't post a picture of your wheels?
That does not make any sense at all.

_________________
Exp001 || TeamLACBC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
SSB wrote:
Can we not turn this into a discussion of the English language? I think your command of English is good enough to understand that context is everything like in every other language on this planet, and certain tones/expressions can still be communicated through the internet (it's not as crystal clear as personal communication of course.) Saying "You're an F'in idiot" is crass no matter what, but saying "WTF" is not necessarily crass- it's an easy way to express extreme surprise or anger over the net.


I am not going argue on this. I am always poor in expressing myself and I failed most of the languages examinations when I was in secondary school. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 94
kai-ming wrote:
justkeepedaling wrote:
thisisatest wrote:
kai-ming wrote:
I believe the rotational weight especially weight away from the rotational axis is important to climbing speed, static weight and weight of the hubs are less less important, although I have not yet 100% proved the point to myself. Cutting weight off the rims could have real substantial benefit to my climbing speed.

rotational weight affects accelerations, not constant-speed conditions. climbing is, for all practical purposes, constant-speed. dont give me the "micro-accelerations" argument, it doesnt work out in the end. so in these cases, the rim weight is no more important than the weight anywhere on the bike (and rider).


Lol, I instantly remembered this thread like it was yesterday. And yes, you are absolutely 100% correct in the engineering (and non-psychological) sense.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57554&hilit=micro+acceleration" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I read that sometime ago, and I shall read that again.
There is certainly psychological help, it is not news that professional team leader need help from domestique to pace him up difficult climbs.
What about if I have poor strength that lower inertia wheels can help me achieve higher speed on difficult climb, while my endurance is good to keep the speed up, that is not something engineering at all.

Heard of higher optimal cadence help muscle endurance? I am no expert on the subject.
I may be too old to prove it to myself. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:21 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 122 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 12x23, Google Adsense [Bot], rmerka, sikptq and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Fulcrum Racing Zero - Freehub material

in Road

excremanwu

4

554

Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:08 pm

Stolichnaya View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Material used to protect carbon rails on Fizik saddles?

in Road

shinkansen

5

697

Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:46 am

stanseven View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Had to have these HEAVY Wheels! Just for the look! PROBLEM!

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

Hbrown

18

2349

Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:19 pm

Hbrown View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. White low profile saddle for heavy rider

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

Spaetzle

21

1397

Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:06 pm

Stats View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Shimano 6870 or Shimano 9000?

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

Ahillock

33

4248

Sat Aug 23, 2014 1:48 pm

Stats View the latest post


It is currently Thu Nov 27, 2014 12:04 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB