Page 1 of 1

new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:48 pm
by bolizous
Does anyone know any of the particulars of the new stem from Richie, supposed to be super lite, or that is what my dealer is saying

new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:48 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:20 pm
by Frankie - B
Edited your topic title a bit to make things more clear.

This was on bike radar earlier today: http://www.bikeradar.com/road/news/arti ... ook-34068/

Image

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:27 pm
by bolizous
Thanks Frankie, just what I was looking for

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:37 pm
by Frankie - B
You are welcome!

Sent from my HTC with Tapatalk.

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:41 pm
by James_London
Given my 120mm alloy Ritchey WCS C260 Stem weighed in at 116g I'm not sure what the fuss is about if you're a Weenie.

Bikeradar states 132g for the new carbon stem in 120mm but it's unclear whether they weighed it before photographing it in a bush or took the weight from Ritchey!

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:56 pm
by Hapsmo911
My 100 mm weighs 110g.

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 5:28 am
by eric01
IMHO, I still prefer aluminum for my stem & bars. And yes, I ride a carbon frame -- not one of those guys who thinks that carbon will spontaneously explode if I look at it the wrong way.

In terms of weight & stiffness, I'm perfectly happy with my deda alloy setup. I don't see the return on spending 2x or 3x the money on a carbon bar & stem.

That said, that Ritchey stem looks awesome. If cost wasn't an issue, I'd get it. ;)

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 6:14 pm
by Estelja
A bit off topic but whatever happened to all of the magnesium stems that were so common about 10 years ago? They sure were light. Was it corrosion problems, durability, flex issues that killed them?

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 6:29 pm
by Zigmeister
I'll stick with my WCS C260 carbon overlay/aluminum, or straight aluminum with aluminum ergo bars thanks.

That ugly chunky thing isn't lighter than the 260 version, and you won't know the difference of stiffness I would guess.

Comes off as the Zipp and Cavendish Pro stem design/look.

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 6:31 pm
by spud
Mag stems from ITM broke at the "ears" where the stem interfaces with the steerer. I think they were structural failures, rather than something brought on my corrosion.

Been riding an Easton Mg stem on the MTB for 5+ years, no issues.

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 10:34 am
by Stolichnaya
This stem look promising as a candidate for a custom bonded one-piece bar/stem set-up from Appleman, Calfee or Berk.

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 11:58 am
by SvenNijs
So it's Giant Overdrive 2 compatible?

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:05 pm
by CBRE
Pretty heavy for the price.

Re: new Ritchey Stem, supposed to be light?

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:05 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com